Long-term outcomes of the pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results of the prospective, multicenter FARA-Freedom Study.


Journal

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 19 12 2023
accepted: 16 02 2024
medline: 22 2 2024
pubmed: 22 2 2024
entrez: 22 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is well-established strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Despite randomized controlled trials and real-world data showing the promise of pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for this treatment, long term efficacy and safety data demonstrating single procedure outcomes off antiarrhythmic drugs remain limited. The aim of the FARA-Freedom Study was to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of PFA using the pentaspline catheter for PAF. FARA-Freedom, a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study, enrolled patients with PAF undergoing de novo PVI with PFA, which were followed for 12 months with weekly transtelephonic monitoring (TTMs) and 72-hr Holter ECG at 6 and 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of device- or procedure-related serious adverse events out to 7 days post-ablation and PV stenosis or atrioesophageal (AE) fistula out to 12 months. Treatment success is a composite of acute PVI and chronic success; which includes freedom from any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia longer than 30 s, use of antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period, or use of amiodarone or repeat ablation at any time. The study enrolled 179 PAF patients (62 ± 10 yr, 39% female) at 13 centers. At index procedure, all PVs were successfully isolated with the pentaspline PFA catheter. Procedure and left atrial dwell times, with a 20 min waiting period, were 71.9 ± 17.6 and 41.0 ± 13.3 min, respectively. Fluoroscopy time was 11.5 ± 7.4 min. Notably, monitoring compliance was high with 88.4% and 90.3% with weekly event and 72-hour Holter monitors, respectively. Freedom from composite primary effectiveness endpoint was 66.6%, 41 patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence: mostly recurrent atrial fibrillation (31 patients). The composite safety endpoint occurred in 2 patients (1.1%), 1 tamponade and 1 TIA. There was no coronary spasm, PV stenosis, or AE fistula. There were 4 cases of transient phrenic nerve palsy, but all resolved during index procedure. In this prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter was effective in treating PAF patients despite rigorous endpoint definitions and high monitoring compliance and demonstrated favorable safety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38385529
pii: 7612551
doi: 10.1093/europace/euae053
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Andreas Metzner (A)

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Martin Fiala (M)

NEURON Medical, Brno, Czech Republic.

Johan Vijgen (J)

Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium.

Alexandre Ouss (A)

Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Melanie Gunawardene (M)

Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg Germany.

Jim Hansen (J)

Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.

Josef Kautzner (J)

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine- IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic.

Boris Schmidt (B)

Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany.

Tobias Reichlin (T)

Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Yuri Blaauw (Y)

University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands.

Philipp Sommer (P)

Hdz Nrw, Bad Oeynhausen, Gemany.

Annelies Vanderper (A)

Boston Scientific Corp, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Anitha B Achyutha (AB)

Boston Scientific Corp, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Madeline Johnson (M)

Boston Scientific Corp, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Jonathan D Raybuck (JD)

Boston Scientific Corp, St. Paul, MN, USA.

Petr Neuzil (P)

Nemocnice Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH