Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardias: The Czech Experience.

catheter ablation complications stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) ventricular tachycardia

Journal

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
ISSN: 2405-5018
Titre abrégé: JACC Clin Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101656995

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 03 05 2023
revised: 27 11 2023
accepted: 04 12 2023
medline: 22 2 2024
pubmed: 22 2 2024
entrez: 22 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) has been proposed recently in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). The purpose of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of STAR in the Czech Republic. VT patients were recruited in 2 expert centers after at least 1 previously failed catheter ablation (CA). A precise strategy of target volume determination and CA was used in 17 patients treated from December 2018 until June 2022 (EFFICACY cohort). This group, together with an earlier series of 19 patients with less-defined treatment strategies, composed the SAFETY cohort (n = 36). A dose of 25 Gy was delivered. In the EFFICACY cohort, the burden of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies decreased, and this drop reached significance for direct current shocks (1.9 ± 3.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 per month; P = 0.03). Eight patients (47%) underwent repeated CA for recurrences of VT during 13.7 ± 11.6 months. In the SAFETY cohort (32 procedures, follow-up >6 months), 8 patients (25%) presented with a progression of mitral valve regurgitation, and 3 (9%) required intervention (median follow-up of 33.5 months). Two cases of esophagitis (6%) were seen with 1 death caused by the esophago-pericardial fistula (3%). A total of 18 patients (50%) died during the median follow-up of 26.9 months. Although STAR may not be very effective in preventing VT recurrences after failed CA in an expert center, it can still modify the arrhythmogenic substrate, and when used with additional CA, reduce the number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Potentially serious sides effects require close follow-up.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) has been proposed recently in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT).
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of STAR in the Czech Republic.
METHODS METHODS
VT patients were recruited in 2 expert centers after at least 1 previously failed catheter ablation (CA). A precise strategy of target volume determination and CA was used in 17 patients treated from December 2018 until June 2022 (EFFICACY cohort). This group, together with an earlier series of 19 patients with less-defined treatment strategies, composed the SAFETY cohort (n = 36). A dose of 25 Gy was delivered.
RESULTS RESULTS
In the EFFICACY cohort, the burden of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies decreased, and this drop reached significance for direct current shocks (1.9 ± 3.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 per month; P = 0.03). Eight patients (47%) underwent repeated CA for recurrences of VT during 13.7 ± 11.6 months. In the SAFETY cohort (32 procedures, follow-up >6 months), 8 patients (25%) presented with a progression of mitral valve regurgitation, and 3 (9%) required intervention (median follow-up of 33.5 months). Two cases of esophagitis (6%) were seen with 1 death caused by the esophago-pericardial fistula (3%). A total of 18 patients (50%) died during the median follow-up of 26.9 months.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although STAR may not be very effective in preventing VT recurrences after failed CA in an expert center, it can still modify the arrhythmogenic substrate, and when used with additional CA, reduce the number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Potentially serious sides effects require close follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38385912
pii: S2405-500X(23)00907-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.12.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by grant project AZV NU20-02-00244 from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. This work was also supported by the project National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (Programme EXCELES, Project No. LX22NPO5104) – Funded by the European Union – Next Generation EU. Dr Cvek has received personal fees from Accuray, and Roche for lectures. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Auteurs

Jana Hašková (J)

Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: hasj@ikem.cz.

Dan Wichterle (D)

Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Josef Kautzner (J)

Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Marek Šramko (M)

Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic.

Petr Peichl (P)

Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic.

Lukáš Knybel PEng (L)

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Ostrava University Medical School, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Otakar Jiravský (O)

Department of Cardiology, Hospital AGEL Třinec-Podlesí, Třinec, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Radek Neuwirth (R)

Department of Cardiology, Hospital AGEL Třinec-Podlesí, Třinec, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jakub Cvek (J)

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Ostrava University Medical School, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH