Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Zagotenemab: Results From PERISCOPE-ALZ, a Phase 2 Study in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease.


Journal

Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 22 2 2024
pubmed: 22 2 2024
entrez: 22 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Zagotenemab (LY3303560), a monoclonal antibody that preferentially targets misfolded, extracellular, aggregated tau, was assessed in the PERISCOPE-ALZ phase 2 study to determine its ability to slow cognitive and functional decline relative to placebo in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD). Participants were enrolled across 56 sites in North America and Japan. Key eligibility criteria included age of 60-85 years, Mini-Mental State Examination score of 20-28, and intermediate levels of brain tau on PET imaging. In this double-blind study, participants were equally randomized to 1,400 mg or 5,600 mg of zagotenemab, or placebo (IV infusion every 4 weeks for 100 weeks). The primary outcome was change on the Integrated AD Rating Scale (iADRS) assessed by a Bayesian Disease Progression model. Secondary measures include mixed model repeated measures analysis of additional cognitive and functional endpoints as well as biomarkers of AD pathology. A total of 360 participants (mean age = 75.4 years; female = 52.8%) were randomized, and 218 completed the treatment period. Demographics and baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced among arms. The mean disease progression ratio (proportional decline in the treated vs placebo group) with 95% credible intervals for the iADRS was 1.10 (0.959-1.265) for the zagotenemab low-dose group and 1.05 (0.907-1.209) for the high-dose, where a ratio less than 1 favors the treatment group. Secondary clinical endpoint measures failed to show a drug-placebo difference in favor of zagotenemab. No treatment effect was demonstrated by flortaucipir PET, volumetric MRI, or neurofilament light chain (NfL) analyses. A dose-related increase in plasma phosphorylated tau181 and total tau was demonstrated. Zagotenemab treatment groups reported a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) (85.1%) compared with the placebo group (74.6%). This difference was not attributable to any specific AE or category of AEs. In participants with early symptomatic AD, zagotenemab failed to achieve significant slowing of clinical disease progression compared with placebo. Imaging biomarker and plasma NfL findings did not show evidence of pharmacodynamic activity or disease modification. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03518073. This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with early symptomatic AD, zagotenemab does not slow clinical disease progression.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Zagotenemab (LY3303560), a monoclonal antibody that preferentially targets misfolded, extracellular, aggregated tau, was assessed in the PERISCOPE-ALZ phase 2 study to determine its ability to slow cognitive and functional decline relative to placebo in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD).
METHODS METHODS
Participants were enrolled across 56 sites in North America and Japan. Key eligibility criteria included age of 60-85 years, Mini-Mental State Examination score of 20-28, and intermediate levels of brain tau on PET imaging. In this double-blind study, participants were equally randomized to 1,400 mg or 5,600 mg of zagotenemab, or placebo (IV infusion every 4 weeks for 100 weeks). The primary outcome was change on the Integrated AD Rating Scale (iADRS) assessed by a Bayesian Disease Progression model. Secondary measures include mixed model repeated measures analysis of additional cognitive and functional endpoints as well as biomarkers of AD pathology.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 360 participants (mean age = 75.4 years; female = 52.8%) were randomized, and 218 completed the treatment period. Demographics and baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced among arms. The mean disease progression ratio (proportional decline in the treated vs placebo group) with 95% credible intervals for the iADRS was 1.10 (0.959-1.265) for the zagotenemab low-dose group and 1.05 (0.907-1.209) for the high-dose, where a ratio less than 1 favors the treatment group. Secondary clinical endpoint measures failed to show a drug-placebo difference in favor of zagotenemab. No treatment effect was demonstrated by flortaucipir PET, volumetric MRI, or neurofilament light chain (NfL) analyses. A dose-related increase in plasma phosphorylated tau181 and total tau was demonstrated. Zagotenemab treatment groups reported a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) (85.1%) compared with the placebo group (74.6%). This difference was not attributable to any specific AE or category of AEs.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
In participants with early symptomatic AD, zagotenemab failed to achieve significant slowing of clinical disease progression compared with placebo. Imaging biomarker and plasma NfL findings did not show evidence of pharmacodynamic activity or disease modification.
TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION UNASSIGNED
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03518073.
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE METHODS
This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with early symptomatic AD, zagotenemab does not slow clinical disease progression.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38386949
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208061
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03518073']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e208061

Auteurs

Adam S Fleisher (AS)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Leanne M Munsie (LM)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

David G S Perahia (DGS)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Scott W Andersen (SW)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Ixavier A Higgins (IA)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Paula M Hauck (PM)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Albert C Lo (AC)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

John R Sims (JR)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Miroslaw Brys (M)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Mark Mintun (M)

From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.
From Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. A.C. Lo is currently at Kisbee Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA.

Classifications MeSH