CT Imaging Assessment of Response to Treatment in Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis in Adults With Bronchial Asthma.

ABPA Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis CT computed tomography radiological response treatment outcomes

Journal

Chest
ISSN: 1931-3543
Titre abrégé: Chest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0231335

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 18 11 2023
revised: 10 02 2024
accepted: 17 02 2024
medline: 23 2 2024
pubmed: 23 2 2024
entrez: 22 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

One of the major challenges in managing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) remains consistent and reproducible assessment of response to treatment. What are the most relevant changes in computed tomography (CT-scan) parameters over time for assessing response to treatment? In this ancillary study of a randomized clinical trial (NEBULAMB), asthmatic patients with available CT-scan and without exacerbation during a 4-month ABPA exacerbation treatment period (corticosteroids and itraconazole) were included. Changed CT-scan parameters were assessed by systematic analyses of CT-scan findings at initiation (M0) and end of treatment (M4). CT-scans were assessed by two radiologists blinded to the clinical data. Radiological parameters were determined by selecting those showing significant changes over time. Improvement of at least one, without worsening of the others, defined the radiological response. Agreement between radiological changes, clinical and immunologic responses was likewise investigated. Among the 139 originally randomized patients, 132 were included. We identified 5 CT-scan parameters showing significant changes at M4: mucoid impaction extent, mucoid impaction density, centrilobular micronodules, consolidation/ground-glass opacities and bronchial wall thickening (P<0.05). These changes were only weakly associated with one another, except for mucoid impaction extent and density. No agreement was observed between clinical or immunologic and radiological responses, assessed as an overall response, or considering each of the parameters (Cohen's κ, -0.01 to 0.24). Changes in extent and density of mucoid impactions, centrilobular micronodules, consolidation/ground-glass opacities and thickening of the bronchial walls were found to be the most relevant CT-scan parameters to assess radiological response to treatment. A clinical, immunologic and radiological multidimensional approach should be adopted to assess outcomes, probably with a composite definition of response to treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
One of the major challenges in managing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) remains consistent and reproducible assessment of response to treatment.
RESEARCH QUESTION OBJECTIVE
What are the most relevant changes in computed tomography (CT-scan) parameters over time for assessing response to treatment?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS METHODS
In this ancillary study of a randomized clinical trial (NEBULAMB), asthmatic patients with available CT-scan and without exacerbation during a 4-month ABPA exacerbation treatment period (corticosteroids and itraconazole) were included. Changed CT-scan parameters were assessed by systematic analyses of CT-scan findings at initiation (M0) and end of treatment (M4). CT-scans were assessed by two radiologists blinded to the clinical data. Radiological parameters were determined by selecting those showing significant changes over time. Improvement of at least one, without worsening of the others, defined the radiological response. Agreement between radiological changes, clinical and immunologic responses was likewise investigated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the 139 originally randomized patients, 132 were included. We identified 5 CT-scan parameters showing significant changes at M4: mucoid impaction extent, mucoid impaction density, centrilobular micronodules, consolidation/ground-glass opacities and bronchial wall thickening (P<0.05). These changes were only weakly associated with one another, except for mucoid impaction extent and density. No agreement was observed between clinical or immunologic and radiological responses, assessed as an overall response, or considering each of the parameters (Cohen's κ, -0.01 to 0.24).
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
Changes in extent and density of mucoid impactions, centrilobular micronodules, consolidation/ground-glass opacities and thickening of the bronchial walls were found to be the most relevant CT-scan parameters to assess radiological response to treatment. A clinical, immunologic and radiological multidimensional approach should be adopted to assess outcomes, probably with a composite definition of response to treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38387646
pii: S0012-3692(24)00261-7
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.026
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Investigateurs

Hervé Mal (H)
Pierre Le Guen (P)
Clairelyne Dupin (C)
Jean Claude Meurice (JC)
Marion Verdaguer (M)
Joe de Keizer (J)
Céline Delétage-Métreau (C)
Raphael Le Mao (R)
Cécile Tromer (C)
Gaëlle Fajole (G)
Mélanie Rayez (M)
Christel Saint Raymond (CS)
Hubert Gheerbrant (H)
Anne Badatcheff (A)
Christine Person (C)
Julie Macey (J)
Xavier Dermant (X)
Jean-François Boitiaux (JF)
Marine Gosset-Woimant (M)
Carine Metz-Favre (C)
Tristan Degot (T)
Claire Poulet (C)
Elisabeth Popin (E)
Anne Sophie Gamez (AS)
Clément Boissin (C)
Anne Prevotat (A)
Gilles Mangiapan (G)
Danielle Brouquières (D)
Hervé Le Floch (H)
Hélène Morisse-Pradier (H)
Caroline Sattler (C)
Daniela Muti (D)
Patrick Germaud (P)
Stéphanie Dirou (S)
Audrey Paris (A)
Boris Melloni (B)
Julia Ballouhey (J)
Louise Bondeelle (L)
Lucie Laurent (L)
Chantal Belleguic (C)
Mallorie Kerjouan (M)
Gaëtan Deslée (G)
Sandra Dury (S)
Emmanuel Bergot (E)
Romain Magnier (R)
Hugues Morel (H)
Bertrand Lemaire (B)
Cécile Tumino (C)
Agathe Sénéchal (A)
Pascaline Choinier (P)
Antoine Parrot (A)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Cendrine Godet (C)

Univ. Paris Cité, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, Service de Pneumologie B et Transplantation pulmonaire, Paris, France. Electronic address: cendrine.godet@aphp.fr.

Anne-Laure Brun (AL)

Hôpital Foch, Service de Radiologie, Suresnes, France.

Francis Couturaud (F)

Univ. Brest, INSERM U1304-GETBO, CHU Brest, Département de Médecine Interne et Pneumologie, CIC INSERM 1412, CHU Brest, FCRIN INNOVTE, France.

François Laurent (F)

Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, CRCTB, U 1045, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.

Jean-Pierre Frat (JP)

Univ. Poitiers, INSERM, CIC 1402, IS-ALIVE, CHU Poitiers, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France.

Sylvain Marchand-Adam (S)

Univ. François Rabelais, Tours, INSERM 1100, Tours, France; CHRU de Tours, service de pneumologie et explorations fonctionnelles respiratoires, Tours, France.

Frédéric Gagnadoux (F)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Service de Pneumologie et Allergologie, Angers, France.

Elodie Blanchard (E)

CHU Bordeaux site Haut Lévêque, Service de Pneumologie, Pessac, France.

Camille Taillé (C)

AP-HP Nord-Université Paris Cité ; Hôpital Bichat, Service de Pneumologie et Centre de Référence constitutif des Maladies Pulmonaires Rares ; INSERM, UMR 1152, Paris, France.

Bruno Philippe (B)

Hôpital NOVO, Service de Pneumologie, Pontoise, France.

Sandrine Hirschi (S)

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service de Pneumologie, Centre de Compétence des Maladies Pulmonaires Rares, Strasbourg, France.

Claire Andréjak (C)

Univ. Picardie Jules Verne, UR 4294, CHU Amiens Picardie, Service de Pneumologie, Amiens, France.

Arnaud Bourdin (A)

Univ. Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, CHU Montpellier, PhyMed Exp, Montpellier, France.

Cécile Chenivesse (C)

Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1019 - UMR9017 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-5900 Lille, France; CRISALIS, F-CRIN Network, INSERM US015, Toulouse, France.

Stéphane Dominique (S)

Univ. Rouen Hospital, Département de Pneumologie, Rouen, France.

Gilles Mangiapan (G)

Service de pneumologie CHI de Créteil, 40 avenue de Verdun 94000 Créteil.

Marlène Murris-Espin (M)

CHU de Toulouse, Service de Pneumologie, CRCM adulte et Transplantation pulmonaire. Clinique des Voies Respiratoires, Hôpital Larrey, Toulouse, France.

Frédéric Rivière (F)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Côte de Nacre, Service de Pneumologie, Caen, France.

Gilles Garcia (G)

Univ. Paris-Saclay, School of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM UMR-S 999 «Pulmonary Hypertension: Pathophysiology and Novel Therapies», Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis-Robinson, France; Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Hypertension National Referral Center, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

François-Xavier Blanc (FX)

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Service de Pneumologie, CIC 1413, l'institut du thorax, Nantes, France.

François Goupil (F)

CH Le Mans, Service de pneumologie, Le Mans, France.

Anne Bergeron (A)

Division of Pulmonology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Thomas Flament (T)

CHRU de Tours, service de pneumologie et explorations fonctionnelles respiratoires, Tours, France.

Pascaline Priou (P)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Service de Pneumologie et Allergologie, Angers, France.

Hervé Mal (H)

Univ. Paris Cité, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, Service de Pneumologie B et Transplantation pulmonaire, Paris, France.

Joe de Keizer (J)

Univ. Poitiers, INSERM, CIC-1402, Biostatistics, Poitiers, France, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Stéphanie Ragot (S)

Univ. Poitiers, INSERM, CIC-1402, Biostatistics, Poitiers, France, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Jacques Cadranel (J)

Univ. Paris Sorbonne, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Service de Pneumologie et Oncologie Thoracique, Centre constitutif Maladies pulmonaires rares Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH