Comparison between transradial and transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy for ICA and M1 occlusions: insights from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR).
Angiography
Stroke
Technique
Thrombectomy
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2024
22 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
07
12
2023
accepted:
12
02
2024
medline:
23
2
2024
pubmed:
23
2
2024
entrez:
22
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The role for the transradial approach for mechanical thrombectomy is controversial. We sought to compare transradial and transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy in a large multicenter database of acute ischemic stroke. The prospectively maintained Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) was reviewed for patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess outcomes including reperfusion time, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), distal embolization, and functional outcomes. A total of 2258 cases, 1976 via the transfemoral approach and 282 via the transradial approach, were included. Radial access was associated with shorter reperfusion time (34.1 min vs 43.6 min, P=0.001) with similar rates of Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2B or greater reperfusion (87.9% vs 88.1%, P=0.246). Patients treated via a transradial approach were more likely to achieve at least TICI 2C (59.6% vs 54.7%, P=0.001) and TICI 3 reperfusion (50.0% vs 46.2%, P=0.001), and had shorter lengths of stay (mean 9.2 days vs 10.2, P<0.001). Patients treated transradially had a lower rate of symptomatic ICH (8.0% vs 9.4%, P=0.047) but a higher rate of distal embolization (23.0% vs 7.1%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in functional outcome at 90 days between the two groups. Radial and femoral thrombectomy resulted in similar clinical outcomes. In multivariate analysis, the radial approach had improved revascularization rates, fewer cases of symptomatic ICH, and faster reperfusion times, but higher rates of distal emboli. Further studies on the optimal approach are necessary based on patient and disease characteristics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The role for the transradial approach for mechanical thrombectomy is controversial. We sought to compare transradial and transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy in a large multicenter database of acute ischemic stroke.
METHODS
METHODS
The prospectively maintained Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) was reviewed for patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess outcomes including reperfusion time, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), distal embolization, and functional outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 2258 cases, 1976 via the transfemoral approach and 282 via the transradial approach, were included. Radial access was associated with shorter reperfusion time (34.1 min vs 43.6 min, P=0.001) with similar rates of Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2B or greater reperfusion (87.9% vs 88.1%, P=0.246). Patients treated via a transradial approach were more likely to achieve at least TICI 2C (59.6% vs 54.7%, P=0.001) and TICI 3 reperfusion (50.0% vs 46.2%, P=0.001), and had shorter lengths of stay (mean 9.2 days vs 10.2, P<0.001). Patients treated transradially had a lower rate of symptomatic ICH (8.0% vs 9.4%, P=0.047) but a higher rate of distal embolization (23.0% vs 7.1%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in functional outcome at 90 days between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Radial and femoral thrombectomy resulted in similar clinical outcomes. In multivariate analysis, the radial approach had improved revascularization rates, fewer cases of symptomatic ICH, and faster reperfusion times, but higher rates of distal emboli. Further studies on the optimal approach are necessary based on patient and disease characteristics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38388480
pii: jnis-2023-021358
doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021358
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: IM: Speakers' honoraria from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. SAK: Grant from Stryker for RESCUE-ICAS registry. RMS: RMS research is supported by the NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, Department of Health Biomedical Research Grant (21K02AWD-007000) and by National Institute of Health (R01NS111119-01A1) and (UL1TR002736, KL2TR002737) through the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. RMS has an unrestricted research grant from Medtronic and Balt and has consulting and teaching agreements with Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, Balt, InNeuroCo, Cerenovus, Naglreiter, Tonbridge, Kaneka, Von Medical, and Optimize Vascular. M-NP: Grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) for the DISTAL trial (33IC30_198783) and TECNO trial (32003B_204977), grant from Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung for the DISTAL trial, unrestricted grants for the DISTAL trial from Stryker Neurovascular, Phenox GmbH, Penumbra and Rapid Medical, Sponsor-PI SPINNERS trial (funded by a Siemens Healthineers AG grant); research agreement with Siemens Healthineers AG; local PI for the ASSIST, EXCELLENT, TENSION, COATING, SURF and ESCAPE-NEXT trials; speaker fees: Stryker Neurovascular, Medtronic, Penumbra, Acandis, Phenox, Siemens Healthineers. EAS: Consultant for Medtronic, Microvention, Rapid Medical. SY: Lecture fee from Stryker, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Kaneka Medics. HC: Consultant for Medtronic, Penumbra and Microvention. JAG: Grant support: Georgia Research Alliance, Emory Medical Care Foundation, Neurosurgery Catalyst; Consultant: Cognition, Imperative Care. DGR: Consultant for Penumbra, Balt, Microvention, Phenox. OT: Consulting agreements: Viz.AI, Penumbra, Balt, Stryker, Imperative; Proctor: Microvention, Medtronic; Educational/research grants: Q’apel, Steinberg Foundation. CM: Consultant for Stryker, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, and Silk Road Medical; speaker for Penumbra and Silk Road Medical; contact PI for NIH Grant R21NS128641. MSP: Consultant for Medtronic. MRL: Unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Stryker; consulting agreement with Medtronic, Aeaean Advisers and Metis Innovative; equity interest in Proprio, Stroke Diagnostics, Apertur, Stereotaxis, Fluid Biomed, and Hyperion Surgical; editorial boards of Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery and Frontiers in Surgery. WB: Holds equity in Nested Knowledge, Superior Medical Editors, Piraeus Medical, Sonoris Medical, and MIVI Neurovascular. He receives royalties from Medtronic and Balloon Guide Catheter Technology. He receives consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Imperative Care, Microvention, MIVI Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Asahi, and Balt. He serves in a leadership or fiduciary role for MIVI Neurovascular, Marblehead Medical LLC, Interventional Neuroradiology (Editor in Chief), Piraeus Medical, and WFITN. RW: Consultant for Medtronic, Stryker, and Synaptive Medical. PN: Consultant for Penumbra, Medtronic, Stryker, Cerenovus and Balt. PK: Grants from the NIH (1U18EB029353-01) and unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic and Siemens; consultant for Imperative Care and Stryker Neurovascular; stock ownership in Vena Medical. RADL: PI for Imperative Trial; research grants from Siemens Healthineers and Kaneka Medical; consultant for Cerenovus, Stryker Neurovascular and Scientia Vascular; minor equity interest Vastrax, Borvo Medical, Synchron, Endostream, Von Vascular. SAC: Consultant and proctor for Medtronic and Microvention. ME: Consultant for viz. Ai, Investing in Galaxy Therapeutics. AMS: Research support from Penumbra, Stryker, Medtronic, RapidAI, Avail; consultant for Penumbra, Stryker, Terumo, and RapidAI; equity Avail.