Analysis of shade-matching ability in dental students: a comparative study under clinical and correcting light conditions.
Aesthetic dentistry
Dental student
Education
Light source
Shade matching
Spectrophotometer
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2024
22 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
26
12
2023
accepted:
07
02
2024
medline:
23
2
2024
pubmed:
23
2
2024
entrez:
23
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Selecting the ideal tooth shade is essential to the success of aesthetic dental restorations. Students' cognitive abilities are involved in the multifaceted and intricate process of shade matching. Hence, the present study aimed to assess and compare the shade-matching ability of undergraduate dental students in various years of dental education under clinical and correcting light. This comparative cross-sectional study was instigated amongst male 4th, 5th, and 6th-year students of the dental complex of King Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A total of 72 male dental students assessed the shade under clinical (fluorescent light) and correcting light (handheld Dental Base Light) by using VITA Classical shade guides. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23 (Armonk, NY, USA). The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between correct and incorrect shade matching under correcting and clinical light. Out of 72 male students, 22(30.6%) were from the 4th year, 26(36.1%) were from the 5th year, and 24(33.3%) were from the 6th year, with a mean age of 22.92 ± 1.01 years. The majority of the 6th-year students selected shade of anterior tooth # 11 correctly under clinical and correcting light, and 3(12.5%) students selected incorrectly under clinical and correcting light, with a statistically significant association among them (p = 0.004). As far as the shade selection of the posterior tooth is concerned, a statistically significant difference was observed under clinical light among all clinical students (p = 0.008). The clinical performance of dental students in shade matching improved with advancing years of dental education. Additionally, the shade matching ability of all groups of dental students was superior under correcting light compared to conditions under clinical light.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Selecting the ideal tooth shade is essential to the success of aesthetic dental restorations. Students' cognitive abilities are involved in the multifaceted and intricate process of shade matching. Hence, the present study aimed to assess and compare the shade-matching ability of undergraduate dental students in various years of dental education under clinical and correcting light.
METHODS
METHODS
This comparative cross-sectional study was instigated amongst male 4th, 5th, and 6th-year students of the dental complex of King Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A total of 72 male dental students assessed the shade under clinical (fluorescent light) and correcting light (handheld Dental Base Light) by using VITA Classical shade guides. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23 (Armonk, NY, USA). The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between correct and incorrect shade matching under correcting and clinical light.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Out of 72 male students, 22(30.6%) were from the 4th year, 26(36.1%) were from the 5th year, and 24(33.3%) were from the 6th year, with a mean age of 22.92 ± 1.01 years. The majority of the 6th-year students selected shade of anterior tooth # 11 correctly under clinical and correcting light, and 3(12.5%) students selected incorrectly under clinical and correcting light, with a statistically significant association among them (p = 0.004). As far as the shade selection of the posterior tooth is concerned, a statistically significant difference was observed under clinical light among all clinical students (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical performance of dental students in shade matching improved with advancing years of dental education. Additionally, the shade matching ability of all groups of dental students was superior under correcting light compared to conditions under clinical light.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38389076
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05146-2
pii: 10.1186/s12909-024-05146-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
169Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia
ID : INST042
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Capa N, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Calikkocaoglu S. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:71–6.
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0023
pubmed: 20045824
Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent. 2014;42:48–52.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.001
pubmed: 24252802
Nakhaei M, Ghanbarzadeh J, Keyvanloo S, Alavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14:100–3.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1279
pubmed: 23579903
Jouhar R, Ahmed MA, Khurshid Z. An overview of Shade Selection in Clinical Dentistry. Appl Sci. 2022;12:6841.
doi: 10.3390/app12146841
Yuan K, Sun X, Wang F, Wang H, Chen JH. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of three computer-aided shade matching instruments. Oper Dent. 2012;37:219–27.
doi: 10.2341/11-230-C
pubmed: 22313274
Nakhaei M, Ghanbarzadeh J, Amirinejad S, Alavi S, Rajatihaghi H. The influence of Dental Shade guides and experience on the Accuracy of Shade Matching. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17:22–6.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1797
pubmed: 27084858
Alnusayri MO, Sghaireen MG, Mathew M, Alzarea B, Bandela V. Shade selection in Esthetic Dentistry: a review. Cureus. 2022;14:e23331.
pubmed: 35464532
pmcid: 9015060
Paravina RD. Performance assessment of dental shade guides. J Dent. 2009;37:e15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.005
pubmed: 19329240
Lee YK, Yu B, Lim HN. Lightness, chroma, and hue distributions of a shade guide as measured by a spectroradiometer. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104:173–81.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60116-3
pubmed: 20813231
Nguyen-Tri D, Overbury O, Faubert J. The role of lenticular senescence in age-related color vision changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3698–704.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1191
pubmed: 12882826
Alabdelmoneam M. Prevalence of congenital color vision defects in Saudi females of arab origin. Optometry. 2011;82:543–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2011.01.013
pubmed: 21680257
Sorkin N, Rosenblatt A, Cohen E, Ohana O, Stolovitch C, Dotan G. Comparison of Ishihara Booklet with Color Vision Smartphone Applications. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:667–72.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000873
pubmed: 27092927
Udiljak Ž, Illeš D, Knezović Zlatarić D, Ćelić R. Effect of clinical experience on the Shade matching accuracy in different Dental Occupational groups. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018;52:132–9.
doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/6
pubmed: 30034012
pmcid: 6047596
Jaju RA, Nagai S, Karimbux N, Da Silva JD. Evaluating tooth color matching ability of dental students. J Dent Educ. 2010;74:1002–10.
doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.9.tb04956.x
pubmed: 20837742
Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, Renault P, Corcodel N, Pohlen B, Marada G, et al. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent. 2009;37:40–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.012
Sikri VK, Color. Implications in dentistry. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13:249–55.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.73381
pubmed: 21217954
pmcid: 3010031
Borse S, Chaware SH. Tooth shade analysis and selection in prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20:131–40.
doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_399_19
pubmed: 32655217
pmcid: 7335029
Gasparik C, Grecu AG, Culic B, Badea ME, Dudea D. Shade-matching performance using a new light-correcting device. J Esthet Res Dent. 2015;27:285–92.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12150
Jasinevicius TR, Curd FM, Schilling L, Sadan A. Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:60–3.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00376.x
pubmed: 19166550
McAndrew R, Chan PW, Milward PJ. An assessment of shade taking by dental undergraduates. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010;18:13–6.
pubmed: 20397497
Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Moldovan O, Dreyhaupt J, Hassel AJ. Effect of external light conditions during matching of tooth color: an intraindividual comparison. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:75–7.
pubmed: 19260433
Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Monjarás-Ávila AJ, Zarow M, Jakubowicz N, Jorquera G, Ashi T, Mancino D, et al. Novel trends in Dental Color Match using different shade selection methods: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Materials. 2022;15:468.
doi: 10.3390/ma15020468
pubmed: 35057185
pmcid: 8778907
Śmielecka M, Dorocka-Bobkowska B. Effects of different light sources on tooth shade selection. Dent Med Probl. 2020;57:61–6.
doi: 10.17219/dmp/114112
pubmed: 32068979
Color Vision Testing. Colorblind Home Page. [(accessed on 1 July 2014)]. Available online: http://colorvisiontesting.com/ishihara.htm
Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007;16:93–100.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00163.x
pubmed: 17362418
Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, Lu E. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int. 2012;43:649–59.
pubmed: 23034418
Labban N, Al-Otaibi H, Alayed A, Alshankiti K, Al-Enizy MA. Assessment of the influence of gender and skin color on the preference of tooth shade in Saudi population. Saudi Dent J. 2017;29:102–10.
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.05.001
pubmed: 28725127
pmcid: 5502911
Alkhudairy R, Tashkandi E. The effectiveness of a shade-matching training program on the dentists’ ability to Match Teeth Color. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29:E33–E43.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12286
pubmed: 28139078
Clary JA, Ontiveros JC, Cron SG, Paravina RD. Influence of light source, polarization, Education, and training on Shade matching quality. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:91–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.008
pubmed: 26851189
Sarah Aburaisi S, Odeh T, Sabbagh D, Al-Moughrabi T, Al Duraibi S. Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions. Int J Curr Res. 2019;11:3663–6.
Gáspárik C, Tofan A, Culic B, Badea M, Dudea D. Influence of light source and clinical experience on shade matching. Clujul Med. 2014;87:30–3.
doi: 10.15386/cjm.2014.8872.871.cg1at2
pubmed: 26527993
pmcid: 4462409
Jabeen B, EVALUATING SHADE MATCHING ABILITY, OF DENTAL PROFESSIONALS. Pak Oral Dent J. 2015;35:332–4.
Samra APB, Moro MG, Mazur RF, Vieira S, De Souza EM, Freire A, Rached RN. Performance of Dental students in Shade matching: impact of training. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29:E24–E32.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12287
pubmed: 28371095
Draghici R, Proteasa CT, Tancu AMC, Proteasa E. Dental color assessment through TTB exercises. J Med Life. 2016;9:61–5.
pubmed: 27974916
pmcid: 5152612
Jain M, Jain V, Yadav NR, Jain S, Singh S, Raghav P, Kohli J, Sharma A. Dental students’ tooth shade selection ability in relation to years of dental education. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:4010–4.
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_803_19
pubmed: 31879651
pmcid: 6924212
Cal E, Güneri P, Kose T. Comparison of digital and spectrophotometric measurements of colour shade guides. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:221–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01560.x
pubmed: 16512889
Dagg H, O’Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:900–4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01310.x
pubmed: 15369473