Digital Humans to Combat Loneliness and Social Isolation: Ethics Concerns and Policy Recommendations.
algorithmic bias
artificial intelligence (AI)
bioethics
digital companions
digital humans
loneliness
privacy
public health ethics
social isolation
Journal
The Hastings Center report
ISSN: 1552-146X
Titre abrégé: Hastings Cent Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0410447
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
medline:
23
2
2024
pubmed:
23
2
2024
entrez:
23
2
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Social isolation and loneliness are growing concerns around the globe that put people at increased risk of disease and early death. One much-touted approach to addressing them is deploying artificially intelligent agents to serve as companions for socially isolated and lonely people. Focusing on digital humans, we consider evidence and ethical arguments for and against this approach. We set forth and defend public health policies that respond to concerns about replacing humans, establishing inferior relationships, algorithmic bias, distributive justice, and data privacy.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7-12Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Hastings Center.
Références
D. L. Surkalim et al., BMJ 376 (2022): doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067068.
World Health Organization, Advocacy Brief: Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older Adults (Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2021), 1.
National Academies of Engineering, Science, and Medicine, Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2020).
V. H. Murthy, Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2023), https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf; Z. Lederman, “Loneliness at the Age of COVID-19,” Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (2023): doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108540;
N. S. Jecker, Ending Midlife Bias: New Values for Old Age (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020); Lancet editors, “Loneliness as a Health Issue,” Lancet 402 (2023): doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01411-3.
Murthy, Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation, 51.
World Health Organization, Advocacy Brief, 8. See also Z. Lederman, “Technological Solutions to Loneliness-Are They Enough?,” Bioethics 37, no. 3 (2023): doi:10.1111/bioe.13096;
N. S. Jecker, “You've Got a Friend in Me: Sociable Robots for Older Adults in an Age of Global Pandemics,” Ethics and Information Technology 23, supp. 1 (2020): doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09546-y;
R. Sparrow and L. Sparrow, “In the Hands of Machines? The Future of Aged Care,” Minds and Machines 16, no. 2 (2006): doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6.
Regarding animation technology, see, for example, Soul Machines, accessed February 6, 2024, https://www.soulmachines.com/.
See “Smarter AI. Happier Customers,” Tech See, accessed February 2, 2024, https://techsee.me; “Sophie, The World's Most Advanced AI Digital Human, to Launch Her Own NFT Video and Art Project,” February 23, 2023, UneeQ, https://www.digitalhumans.com/blog/sophie-uneeq-to-launch-digital-human-nft-art-project; “Loneliness and the Role of Conversational AI Companions,” UneeQ, accessed February 2, 2024, https://www.digitalhumans.com/blog/loneliness-and-the-role-of-conversational-ai-companions; and “I Am Sophie,” accessed February 2, 2024, https://d3mdyry31n8x9i.cloudfront.net.
“The AI Companion Who Cares,” Replika, accessed January 26, 2024, https://replika.ai/.
Lederman, “Technological Solutions to Loneliness”; Jecker, “You've Got a Friend in Me”; Sparrow and Sparrow, “In the Hands of Machines”; K. Loveys et al., “Reducing Patient Loneliness with Artificial Agents: Design Insights from Evolutionary Neuropsychiatry,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, no. 7 (2019): doi:10.2196/13664;
K. Loveys et al., “A Digital Human for Delivering a Remote Loneliness and Stress Intervention to At-Risk Younger and Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Pilot Trial,” JMIR Mental Health 8, no. 11 (2021): doi:10.2196/31586.
L. Ring et al., “Social Support Agents for Older Adults: Longitudinal Affective Computing in the Home,” Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 9, no. 1 (2015): doi:10.1007/s12193-014-0157-0.
Loveys et al., “A Digital Human for Delivering a Remote Loneliness and Stress Intervention”; V. Ta et al., “User Experiences of Social Support from Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, no. 3 (2020): doi:10.2196/16235.
For the study of Replika, see Ta et al., “User Experiences of Social Support from Chatbots.” For the study of Tanya, see Ring et al., “Social Support Agents for Older Adults.” For the study of Bella, see Loveys et al., “A Digital Human for Delivering a Remote Loneliness and Stress Intervention.”
A. Tong, “AI Chatbot Company Replika Restores Erotic Roleplay for Some Users,” Reuters, March 25, 2023, at Reuters.com.
E. Anderson, Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 150-51.
R. Sparrow, “Robots in Aged Care: A Dystopian Future?,” AI and Society 31, no. 4 (2016): doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0625-4.
Jecker, “You've Got a Friend in Me”; J. Wang et al., “Associations between Loneliness and Perceived Social Support and Outcomes of Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review,” BMC Psychiatry 18 (2018): doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5.
S. Caton and C. Haas, “Fairness in Machine Learning,” ACM Computing Survey (August 23, 2023 [epub ahead of print]): doi:10.1145/10.1145/3616865.
For an overview of algorithmic bias, including algorithmic oppression in search engines, see S. U. Noble, Algorithms of Oppression (New York: New York University Press, 2018). For an analysis of bias embedded in representation, see R. Sparrow, “How Robots Have Politics,” in Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics, ed. C. Véliz (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021): doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.001.0001.
S. Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2019), 48.
For comprehensive discussions of meaningful consent to AI, see S. Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (New York: Hachette Book Group, 2019), and A. Ho, Live Like Nobody Is Watching: Relational Autonomy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Health Monitoring (New York: Oxford University Press, 2023). For discussion of privacy interdependence, see B. Evans, “Big Data and Individual Autonomy in a Crowd,” in Big Data Health Law and Bioethics, ed. G. Cohen et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 19-28. For discussion of mechanisms being developed to address privacy interdependency, see B. Kamleitner and V. Mitchell, “Your Data Is My Data: A Framework for Addressing Interdependent Privacy Infringements,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 38, no. 4 (2019): doi:10.1177/0743915619858924.
These proposals incorporate ideas set forth in Exec. Order No. 14110, Fed. Reg. 88, no. 210 (Nov. 1, 2023); Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence of the National Science and Technology Council, National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan 2023 Update (Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy, 2023), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/National-Artificial-Intelligence-Research-and-Development-Strategic-Plan-2023-Update.pdf; Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy, 2016), https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/preparing_for_the_future_of_ai.pdf; and the European Union's AI Act (see “EU AI Act: First Regulation on Artificial Intelligence,” European Parliament, created June 8, 2023, updated June 14, 2023, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence). Our proposals also borrow from M. M. Mello, N. H. Shah, and D. S. Char, “President Biden's Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence-Implications for Health Care Organizations,” Journal of the American Medical Association 331, no. 1 (2023): doi:10.1001/jama.2023.25051.