Enteral Delivery of Pravastatin Sodium Tablets: Effect of Compounding into a Liquid Form and Co-Administration of Enteral Nutrition.

enteral formulas fibers pravastatin sodium tablet compounding

Journal

Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2226-4787
Titre abrégé: Pharmacy (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101678532

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 12 01 2024
revised: 29 01 2024
accepted: 07 02 2024
medline: 23 2 2024
pubmed: 23 2 2024
entrez: 23 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Compounding solid oral dosage forms into liquid preparations is a common practice for administering drug therapy to patients with swallowing difficulties. This is particularly relevant for those on enteral nutrition, where factors such as the administration procedure and co-administration of enteral nutrition play crucial roles in effective drug delivery. Due to the limited studies focused on this practice, the impact of co-administered nutrition remains unclear. Pravastatin tablets were compounded into two liquid formulations and administered through three independent tubes for ten cycles. The drug amount was quantified upstream and downstream of the tubes both with and without different (fiber content) nutritional boluses. The compounding procedure did not lower the drug amount with respect to the original tablets. However, when the liquid formulation was pumped through the tubes, a statistically significant reduction in the pravastatin administered (between 4.6% and 11.3%) was observed. The co-administration of different nutritional boluses or the compounding procedure did not affect the general results. Pravastatin loss appears unavoidable when administered via the enteral tube. Although, in this case, the loss was of limited clinical relevance, it is important not to underestimate this phenomenon, especially with drugs having a narrow therapeutic index.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Compounding solid oral dosage forms into liquid preparations is a common practice for administering drug therapy to patients with swallowing difficulties. This is particularly relevant for those on enteral nutrition, where factors such as the administration procedure and co-administration of enteral nutrition play crucial roles in effective drug delivery. Due to the limited studies focused on this practice, the impact of co-administered nutrition remains unclear.
METHODS METHODS
Pravastatin tablets were compounded into two liquid formulations and administered through three independent tubes for ten cycles. The drug amount was quantified upstream and downstream of the tubes both with and without different (fiber content) nutritional boluses.
RESULTS RESULTS
The compounding procedure did not lower the drug amount with respect to the original tablets. However, when the liquid formulation was pumped through the tubes, a statistically significant reduction in the pravastatin administered (between 4.6% and 11.3%) was observed. The co-administration of different nutritional boluses or the compounding procedure did not affect the general results.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Pravastatin loss appears unavoidable when administered via the enteral tube. Although, in this case, the loss was of limited clinical relevance, it is important not to underestimate this phenomenon, especially with drugs having a narrow therapeutic index.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38392939
pii: pharmacy12010032
doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12010032
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Serena Logrippo (S)

Hospital Pharmacy, Santa Maria della Stella Hospital, USL Umbria 2, 05018 Orvieto, Italy.
Hospital Pharmacy, Engles Profili Hospital, AST Ancona, 60044 Fabriano, Italy.

Roberta Ganzetti (R)

Hospital Pharmacy, Carlo Urbani Hospital, AST Ancona, 60035 Jesi, Italy.

Matteo Sestili (M)

Territorial Pharmaceutical Service, AST Ancona, 60035 Jesi, Italy.

Diego Romano Perinelli (DR)

CHIP Building, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Marco Cespi (M)

CHIP Building, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Giulia Bonacucina (G)

CHIP Building, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Classifications MeSH