Enteral Delivery of Pravastatin Sodium Tablets: Effect of Compounding into a Liquid Form and Co-Administration of Enteral Nutrition.
enteral formulas
fibers
pravastatin sodium
tablet compounding
Journal
Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2226-4787
Titre abrégé: Pharmacy (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101678532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Feb 2024
09 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
12
01
2024
revised:
29
01
2024
accepted:
07
02
2024
medline:
23
2
2024
pubmed:
23
2
2024
entrez:
23
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Compounding solid oral dosage forms into liquid preparations is a common practice for administering drug therapy to patients with swallowing difficulties. This is particularly relevant for those on enteral nutrition, where factors such as the administration procedure and co-administration of enteral nutrition play crucial roles in effective drug delivery. Due to the limited studies focused on this practice, the impact of co-administered nutrition remains unclear. Pravastatin tablets were compounded into two liquid formulations and administered through three independent tubes for ten cycles. The drug amount was quantified upstream and downstream of the tubes both with and without different (fiber content) nutritional boluses. The compounding procedure did not lower the drug amount with respect to the original tablets. However, when the liquid formulation was pumped through the tubes, a statistically significant reduction in the pravastatin administered (between 4.6% and 11.3%) was observed. The co-administration of different nutritional boluses or the compounding procedure did not affect the general results. Pravastatin loss appears unavoidable when administered via the enteral tube. Although, in this case, the loss was of limited clinical relevance, it is important not to underestimate this phenomenon, especially with drugs having a narrow therapeutic index.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Compounding solid oral dosage forms into liquid preparations is a common practice for administering drug therapy to patients with swallowing difficulties. This is particularly relevant for those on enteral nutrition, where factors such as the administration procedure and co-administration of enteral nutrition play crucial roles in effective drug delivery. Due to the limited studies focused on this practice, the impact of co-administered nutrition remains unclear.
METHODS
METHODS
Pravastatin tablets were compounded into two liquid formulations and administered through three independent tubes for ten cycles. The drug amount was quantified upstream and downstream of the tubes both with and without different (fiber content) nutritional boluses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The compounding procedure did not lower the drug amount with respect to the original tablets. However, when the liquid formulation was pumped through the tubes, a statistically significant reduction in the pravastatin administered (between 4.6% and 11.3%) was observed. The co-administration of different nutritional boluses or the compounding procedure did not affect the general results.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Pravastatin loss appears unavoidable when administered via the enteral tube. Although, in this case, the loss was of limited clinical relevance, it is important not to underestimate this phenomenon, especially with drugs having a narrow therapeutic index.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38392939
pii: pharmacy12010032
doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12010032
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng