Impact of feeding regimes and lactation stage on sensory attributes of Cheddar cheese.

Cheese Grass-Fed Sensory Evaluation Texture Analysis Volatile Analysis

Journal

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)
ISSN: 1873-7145
Titre abrégé: Food Res Int
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9210143

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 20 11 2023
revised: 15 01 2024
accepted: 24 01 2024
medline: 24 2 2024
pubmed: 24 2 2024
entrez: 23 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study investigated the effects of diet and stage of lactation (SOL) on sensory profiles, texture, volatile profiles, and colour of Cheddar cheese. Cheddar cheese was manufactured from early-, mid-, and late-lactation milk obtained from seasonally calved cows (n = 54). Cows were assigned a diet; group 1: perennial ryegrass (GRS), group 2: total mixed ration (TMR), and group 3: partial mixed ration (PMR). Instrumental analysis was performed at 270 days (mature Cheddar). Sensory evaluation took place after 548 days (extra mature Cheddar). Toluene was the only volatile compound that was significantly influenced by diet. The trained panel rated early-lactation cheese as stronger than mid- and late- for cowy/barny flavour and late-lactation cheese as sweeter than early- and mid-lactation cheese. Mid-lactation cheese was liked least overall. Early-lactation cheeses were rated higher for 'crumbly' texture than mid- and late. Diet affected consumer ratings, with GRS and PMR cheese rated as more intense than TMR for flavour, aftertaste, and saltiness. Consumers reported that TMR cheese was lighter in colour compared to GRS cheese, which was supported by instrumental analysis. Consumers perceived GRS as more springy and less crumbly than TMR and PMR, while Texture Profile Analysis indicated that TMR was harder than GRS. Consumer segmentation was observed with two clear preference groups, one preferring GRS and one preferring TMR. For both groups, 'taste' seemed to be the main driver of liking, highlighting that consumer preference is most impacted by individual taste preferences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38395564
pii: S0963-9969(24)00116-9
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114046
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

114046

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [E.D.O’R and E.L.F have received research funding through the Food for Health Ireland project, funded by Enterprise Ireland and industry partners, grant number TC20180025. L.MG and M.T are supported by the Food for Health Ireland project, funded by Enterprise Ireland and industry, grant number TC20180025. E.L.F has previously received travel expenses and /or speaking honoraria from the National Dairy Council and the European Milk Forum. The funders had no role in the analyses or interpretation of data in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the findings.].

Auteurs

Lauren McGuinness (L)

Food for Health Ireland (FHI), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland; UCD Institute of Food and Health, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland. Electronic address: lauren.mc-guinness@ucdconnect.ie.

Mark Timlin (M)

Food for Health Ireland (FHI), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland; UCD Institute of Food and Health, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland; Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Cork P61 C996, Ireland.

John P Murphy (JP)

Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., Cork P61 P302, Ireland.

Deirdre Hennessy (D)

Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., Cork P61 P302, Ireland; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork T23 N73K, Ireland.

Ellen Fitzpatrick (E)

Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, Wexford Y35 Y521, Ireland.

Kieran McCarthy (K)

Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., Cork P61 P302, Ireland.

Michael O'Donovan (M)

Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., Cork P61 P302, Ireland.

Tom F O'Callaghan (TF)

Food for Health Ireland (FHI), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland; School of Food and Nutritional Science, University College Cork T12 Y337, Ireland.

Kieran N Kilcawley (KN)

Department of Food Quality and Sensory Science, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., Cork P61 C996, Ireland; School of Food and Nutritional Science, University College Cork T12 Y337, Ireland.

E Dolores O'Riordan (E)

Food for Health Ireland (FHI), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland; UCD Institute of Food and Health, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland.

Andre Brodkorb (A)

Food for Health Ireland (FHI), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland; Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Cork P61 C996, Ireland.

Jeremiah J Sheehan (JJ)

Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Cork P61 C996, Ireland.

Emma L Feeney (EL)

Food for Health Ireland (FHI), University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland; UCD Institute of Food and Health, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4 D04 V1W8, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH