Emerging Trends in AI and Radiomics for Bladder, Kidney, and Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.

artificial intelligence bladder cancer diagnostic imaging kidney cancer oncology personalized medicine prostate cancer radiomics urological cancers

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 06 01 2024
revised: 02 02 2024
accepted: 14 02 2024
medline: 24 2 2024
pubmed: 24 2 2024
entrez: 24 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This comprehensive review critically examines the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of bladder, kidney, and prostate cancers. These cutting-edge technologies are revolutionizing the landscape of cancer care, enhancing both precision and personalization in medical treatments. Our review provides an in-depth analysis of the latest advancements in AI and radiomics, with a specific focus on their roles in urological oncology. We discuss how AI and radiomics have notably improved the accuracy of diagnosis and staging in bladder cancer, especially through advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and CT scans. These tools are pivotal in assessing muscle invasiveness and pathological grades, critical elements in formulating treatment plans. In the realm of kidney cancer, AI and radiomics aid in distinguishing between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and grades. The integration of radiogenomics offers a comprehensive view of disease biology, leading to tailored therapeutic approaches. Prostate cancer diagnosis and management have also seen substantial benefits from these technologies. AI-enhanced MRI has significantly improved tumor detection and localization, thereby aiding in more effective treatment planning. The review also addresses the challenges in integrating AI and radiomics into clinical practice, such as the need for standardization, ensuring data quality, and overcoming the "black box" nature of AI. We emphasize the importance of multicentric collaborations and extensive studies to enhance the applicability and generalizability of these technologies in diverse clinical settings. In conclusion, AI and radiomics represent a major paradigm shift in oncology, offering more precise, personalized, and patient-centric approaches to cancer care. While their potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes, and our understanding of cancer biology is profound, challenges in clinical integration and application persist. We advocate for continued research and development in AI and radiomics, underscoring the need to address existing limitations to fully leverage their capabilities in the field of oncology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38398201
pii: cancers16040810
doi: 10.3390/cancers16040810
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Georgios Feretzakis (G)

School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece.

Patrick Juliebø-Jones (P)

Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Department of Clinical, Medicine University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
European Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Urolithiasis Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Arman Tsaturyan (A)

European Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Urolithiasis Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Erebouni Medical Center, Yerevan 0087, Armenia.

Tarik Emre Sener (TE)

European Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Urolithiasis Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul 34854, Turkey.

Vassilios S Verykios (VS)

School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece.

Dimitrios Karapiperis (D)

School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Themistoklis Bellos (T)

Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.

Stamatios Katsimperis (S)

Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.

Panagiotis Angelopoulos (P)

Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.

Ioannis Varkarakis (I)

Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.

Andreas Skolarikos (A)

Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.

Bhaskar Somani (B)

Department of Urology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.

Lazaros Tzelves (L)

European Association of Urology, Young Academic Urologists, Urolithiasis Group, NL-6803 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece.

Classifications MeSH