Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.

AlphaFold2 contact map deep learning distance map end-to-end methods multi-domain proteins protein language model protein tertiary structure prediction template-based modeling template-free modeling

Journal

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 30 12 2023
revised: 06 02 2024
accepted: 08 02 2024
medline: 24 2 2024
pubmed: 24 2 2024
entrez: 24 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The prediction of three-dimensional (3D) protein structure from amino acid sequences has stood as a significant challenge in computational and structural bioinformatics for decades. Recently, the widespread integration of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms has substantially expedited advancements in protein structure prediction, yielding numerous significant milestones. In particular, the end-to-end deep learning method AlphaFold2 has facilitated the rise of structure prediction performance to new heights, regularly competitive with experimental structures in the 14th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP14). To provide a comprehensive understanding and guide future research in the field of protein structure prediction for researchers, this review describes various methodologies, assessments, and databases in protein structure prediction, including traditionally used protein structure prediction methods, such as template-based modeling (TBM) and template-free modeling (FM) approaches; recently developed deep learning-based methods, such as contact/distance-guided methods, end-to-end folding methods, and protein language model (PLM)-based methods; multi-domain protein structure prediction methods; the CASP experiments and related assessments; and the recently released AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AlphaFold DB). We discuss their advantages, disadvantages, and application scopes, aiming to provide researchers with insights through which to understand the limitations, contexts, and effective selections of protein structure prediction methods in protein-related fields.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38398585
pii: molecules29040832
doi: 10.3390/molecules29040832
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 92370128
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81973243
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin
ID : 21JCYBJC00340

Auteurs

Qiqige Wuyun (Q)

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Yihan Chen (Y)

School of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

Yifeng Shen (Y)

Faculty of Environment and Information Studies, Keio University, Fujisawa 252-0882, Kanagawa, Japan.

Yang Cao (Y)

College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.

Gang Hu (G)

NITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

Wei Cui (W)

School of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

Jianzhao Gao (J)

School of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

Wei Zheng (W)

Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Classifications MeSH