Stakeholder participation in the COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and response plans: A synthesis of findings from 70 countries.

COVID-19 national plans Priority setting Stakeholder participation

Journal

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-6054
Titre abrégé: Health Policy
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8409431

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 23 06 2023
revised: 30 01 2024
accepted: 05 02 2024
medline: 25 2 2024
pubmed: 25 2 2024
entrez: 24 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Stakeholder participation is a key component of a fair and equitable priority-setting in health. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for fair and equitable priority setting, and hence, stakeholder participation. To date, there is limited literature on stakeholder participation in the development of the pandemic plans (including the priority setting plans) that were rapidly developed during the pandemic. Drawing on a global study of national COVID-19 preparedness and response plans, we present a secondary analysis of COVID-19 national plans from 70 countries from the six WHO regions, focusing on stakeholder participation. We found that most plans were prepared by the Ministry of Health and acknowledged WHO guidance, however less than half mentioned that additional stakeholders were involved. Few plans described a strategy for stakeholder participation and/or accounted for public participation in the plan preparation. However, diverse stakeholders (including multiple governmental, non-governmental, and international organizations) were proposed to participate in the implementation of the plans. Overall, there was a lack of transparency about who participated in decision-making and limited evidence of meaningful participation of the community, including marginalized groups. The critical relevance of stakeholder participation in priority setting requires that governments develop strategies for meaningful participation of diverse stakeholders during pandemics such as COVID-19, and in routine healthcare priority setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38401332
pii: S0168-8510(24)00023-X
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

105013

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest We declare no conflict.

Auteurs

Bernardo Aguilera (B)

Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastian, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.

Razavi S Donya (RS)

Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada.

Claudia-Marcela Vélez (CM)

Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, KTH-226, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Cra 51d #62-29, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.

Lydia Kapiriri (L)

Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, KTH-226, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada. Electronic address: Kapirir@mcmaster.ca.

Julia Abelson (J)

Health Policy Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4, Canada.

Elysee Nouvet (E)

School of Health Studies, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada.

Marion Danis (M)

Section on Ethics and Health Policy, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Susan Goold (S)

Internal Medicine and Health Management and Policy, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg. 14, G016, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA.

Ieystn Williams (I)

School of Social Policy, HSMC, Park House, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK.

Mariam Noorulhuda (M)

National Institutes of Health, United States.

Classifications MeSH