The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) on Treatment Decision Making for Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): 5-Year Data Analysis.

Multidisciplinary tumor board Renal cell carcinoma Shared decision making

Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 21 11 2023
accepted: 29 01 2024
medline: 25 2 2024
pubmed: 25 2 2024
entrez: 24 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To describe the impact of a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in a locoregional renal cancer network by evaluating shared decision making (SDM) and adherence to MTB recommendations. This prospective cohort study included all cases from a Dutch renal cancer network with suspicion of or histologically confirmed RCC discussed in MTBs between 2017-2022. Main endpoints were distribution of cases presented, proportion of recommendations with multiple treatment options enabling shared decision making (SDM), definite treatment after SDM and adherence to MTB recommendations. Further endpoints were definite treatment per tumor stage stratified by age and inclusion in clinical trials. Outcomes were displayed as means and proportions (%). Pearson's Chi-Squared test was used to analyze the effect of age on definite treatment advice. Overall, 2651 cases were discussed, of which 1900 (72%) were new referrals and 751 (28%) rediscussions. Majority of cases were cT1a-b tumors (46%) and 22% were local recurrences or metachronous metastatic. Adherence to MTB recommendation was 96% and in 30% multiple treatment options were recommended, allowing for SDM. In 45% of cases with cT1a tumors multiple treatment options were recommended by the MTB, resulting in (cryo)ablation (32%) and AS (30%) as most frequent definite treatments after SDM. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors the inclusion rate in clinical trials was 47%. A network MTB creates opportunity to discuss multiple treatment options and clinical trials in SDM with patients at a high rate of adherence to MTB recommendation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38402089
pii: S1558-7673(24)00022-3
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.01.021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Luna van den Brink (LVD)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.vandenbrink@amsterdamumc.nl.

Annebeth E C Ruiter (AEC)

OLVG (Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis), Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Brunolf W Lagerveld (BW)

OLVG (Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis), Department of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Niels M Graafland (NM)

Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Axel Bex (A)

Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Harrie P Beerlage (HP)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jeroen R A van Moorselaar (JRA)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Patricia J Zondervan (PJ)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH