Biomechanical effects of cranial closing wedge osteotomy on joint stability in normal canine stifles: an ex vivo study.

Biomechanics Cranial closing wedge osteotomy Cranial cruciate ligament Dog Six-degree-of-freedom robotic joint biomechanical testing system Stifle joint

Journal

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 13 06 2023
accepted: 08 02 2024
medline: 25 2 2024
pubmed: 25 2 2024
entrez: 24 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cranial closing wedge osteotomy (CCWO) is a functional stabilisation technique for cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) ruptures. This biomechanical study aimed to evaluate the influence of CCWO on the stability of the stifle joint. Eighteen Beagle stifle joints were divided into two groups: control and CCWO. The stifle joints were analyzed using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic joint biomechanical testing system. The joints were subjected to 30 N in the craniocaudal (CrCd) drawer and proximal compression tests and 1 Nm in the internal-external (IE) rotation test. Each test was performed with an extension position, 135°, and 120° of joint angle. The stifle joints were tested while the CrCLs were intact and then transected. In the drawer test, the CCWO procedure, CrCL transection, and stifle joint flexion increased CrCd displacement. The CCWO procedure and CrCL transection showed an interaction effect. In the compression test, the CCWO procedure decreased and CrCL transection and stifle joint flexion increased displacement. In the IE rotation test, CCWO, CrCL transection, and stifle joint flexion increased the range of motion. CCWO was expected to provide stability against compressive force but does not contribute to stability in the drawer or rotational tests. In the CCWO-treated stifle joint, instability during the drawer test worsened with CrCL transection. In other words, performing the CCWO procedure when the CrCL function is present is desirable for stabilizing the stifle joint.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cranial closing wedge osteotomy (CCWO) is a functional stabilisation technique for cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) ruptures. This biomechanical study aimed to evaluate the influence of CCWO on the stability of the stifle joint. Eighteen Beagle stifle joints were divided into two groups: control and CCWO. The stifle joints were analyzed using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic joint biomechanical testing system. The joints were subjected to 30 N in the craniocaudal (CrCd) drawer and proximal compression tests and 1 Nm in the internal-external (IE) rotation test. Each test was performed with an extension position, 135°, and 120° of joint angle.
RESULTS RESULTS
The stifle joints were tested while the CrCLs were intact and then transected. In the drawer test, the CCWO procedure, CrCL transection, and stifle joint flexion increased CrCd displacement. The CCWO procedure and CrCL transection showed an interaction effect. In the compression test, the CCWO procedure decreased and CrCL transection and stifle joint flexion increased displacement. In the IE rotation test, CCWO, CrCL transection, and stifle joint flexion increased the range of motion.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
CCWO was expected to provide stability against compressive force but does not contribute to stability in the drawer or rotational tests. In the CCWO-treated stifle joint, instability during the drawer test worsened with CrCL transection. In other words, performing the CCWO procedure when the CrCL function is present is desirable for stabilizing the stifle joint.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38402170
doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03923-1
pii: 10.1186/s12917-024-03923-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

72

Subventions

Organisme : AO Foundation
ID : 115492
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : JP23K14096

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Arnoczky SP, Marshall JL. The cruciate ligaments of the canine stifle: an anatomical and functional analysis. Am J Vet Res. 1977;38:1807–14.
pubmed: 931164
Kanno N, Hara Y, Fukano S, Fujie H, Ochi H, Fujita Y, et al. Tibial displacement with stifle joint flexion and cranial cruciate ligament transection in the dog. An ex vivo study using a robotic simulator. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2014;27:277–84. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-13-06-0080 .
doi: 10.3415/VCOT-13-06-0080 pubmed: 24992560
Shimada M, Takagi T, Kanno N, Yamakawa S, Fujie H, Ichinohe T, et al. Biomechanical effects of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy on joint instability in normal canine stifles: an in vitro study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2020;33:301–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709505 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709505 pubmed: 32283560
Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial thrust: a primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1983;183:456–9.
pubmed: 6618973
Brioschi V, Arthurs GI. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small dogs (< 15 kg): a narrative literature review. J Small Anim Pract. 2021;62:1037–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13404 .
doi: 10.1111/jsap.13404 pubmed: 34269419
Kim SE, Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Lewis DD. Tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet Surg. 2008;37:111–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00361.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00361.x pubmed: 18251804
Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial wedge osteotomy: a technique for eliminating cranial tibial thrust in cranial cruciate ligament repair. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984;184:564–9.
pubmed: 6706801
Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1993;23:777–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-5616(93)50082-7 .
doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(93)50082-7 pubmed: 8337790
Nanda A, Hans EC. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in canines: patient selection and reported outcomes. Vet Med (Auckl). 2019;10:249–55. https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S204321 .
doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S204321 pubmed: 31921614
Wallace AM, Addison ES, Smith BA, Radke H, Hobbs SJ. Modification of the cranial closing wedge ostectomy technique for the treatment of canine cruciate disease. Description and comparison with standard technique. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2011;24:457–62. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-10-11-0159 .
doi: 10.3415/VCOT-10-11-0159 pubmed: 21976135
Corr SA, Brown C. A comparison of outcomes following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy and cranial tibial wedge osteotomy procedures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2007;20:312–9. https://doi.org/10.1160/vcot-07-02-0013 .
doi: 10.1160/vcot-07-02-0013 pubmed: 18038011
Oxley B, Gemmill TJ, Renwick AR, Clements DN, McKee WM. Comparison of complication rates and clinical outcome between tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and a modified cranial closing wedge osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. Vet Surg. 2013;42:739–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12033.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12033.x pubmed: 23889810
Lee JY, Kim G, Kim JH, Choi SH. Kinematic gait analysis of the Hind limb after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy and cranial tibial wedge osteotomy in ten dogs. J Vet Med Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2007;54:579–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.01003.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.01003.x
Apelt D, Pozzi A, Marcellin-Little DJ, Kowaleski MP. Effect of cranial tibial closing wedge angle on tibial subluxation: an ex vivo study. Vet Surg. 2010;39:454–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00670.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00670.x pubmed: 20345522
Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP, Perry RL. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: an in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg. 2001;30:278–86. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2001.21400 .
doi: 10.1053/jvet.2001.21400 pubmed: 11340560
Muir P. Physical examination of lame dogs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 1997;19:1149–61.
Fujie H, Livesay GA, Fujita M, Woo SL. Forces and moments in six-DOF at the human knee joint: Mathematical description for control. J Biomech. 1996;29:1577–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(96)80009-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(96)80009-1 pubmed: 8945656
Fujie H, Livesay GA, Woo SL, Kashiwaguchi S, Blomstrom G. The use of a universal force-moment sensor to determine in-situ forces in ligaments: a New Methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1995;117:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2792266 .
doi: 10.1115/1.2792266 pubmed: 7609472
Fujie H, Mabuchi K, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Arai S, Tsukamoto Y. The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng. 1993;115:211–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2895477 .
doi: 10.1115/1.2895477 pubmed: 8231133
Fujie H, Sekito T, Orita A. A novel robotic system for joint biomechanical tests: application to the human knee joint. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1644567 .
doi: 10.1115/1.1644567 pubmed: 15171129
Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105:136–44. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138397 .
doi: 10.1115/1.3138397 pubmed: 6865355
Vasseur PB, Arnoczky SP. Collateral ligaments of the canine stifle joint: anatomic and functional analysis. Am J Vet Res. 1981;42:1133–7.
pubmed: 7271030
Kim SE, Pozzi A, Banks SA, Conrad BP, Lewis DD. Effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on femorotibial contact mechanics and stifle kinematics. Vet Surg. 2009;38:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00470.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00470.x pubmed: 19152614
Shimada M, Takagi T, Kanno N, Yamakawa S, Fujie H, Hara Y. Influence of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy on the tensile forces sustained by ligaments in cranial cruciate ligament-intact canine stifles: an ex vivo pilot study. Vet Med Sci. 2022;8:1904–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.889 .
doi: 10.1002/vms3.889 pubmed: 35947706 pmcid: 9514505
Barger B, Piazza A, Muir P. Treatment of stable partial cruciate rupture (Grade 1 sprain) in five dogs with tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. Vet Rec Case Rep. 2016;4:e000315. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreccr-2016-000315 .
doi: 10.1136/vetreccr-2016-000315
Hulse D, Beale B, Kerwin S. Second look arthroscopic findings after Tibial Plateau leveling Osteotomy. Vet Surg. 2010;39:350–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00676.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00676.x pubmed: 20522215
Shimada M, Mizokami N, Ichinohe T, Kanno N, Suzuki S, Yogo T, et al. Long-term outcome and progression of osteoarthritis in uncomplicated cases of cranial cruciate ligament rupture treated by tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 2020;82:908–16. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.19-0613 .
doi: 10.1292/jvms.19-0613 pubmed: 32448811 pmcid: 7399324
Guénégo L, Vezzoni A, Vezzoni L. Comparison of tibial anatomical-mechanical axis angles and patellar positions between tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) and modified cranial closing wedge osteotomy (AMA-based CCWO) for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament disease in large dogs with tibial plateau slopes greater than 30° and clinically normal labradors retrievers. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17:368. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03094-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03094-3 pubmed: 34861875 pmcid: 8641203
Talaat MB, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Combination tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and cranial closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles with excessive tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg. 2006;35:729–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00217.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00217.x pubmed: 17187635
Spinella G, Arcamone G, Valentini S. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: review on biomechanics, etiopathogenetic factors and rehabilitation. Vet Sci. 2021;8:186. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8090186 .
doi: 10.3390/vetsci8090186 pubmed: 34564580 pmcid: 8472898
Bailey CJ, Smith BA, Black AP. Geometric implications of the tibial wedge osteotomy for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2007;20:169–74. https://doi.org/10.1160/vcot-06-02-0012 .
doi: 10.1160/vcot-06-02-0012 pubmed: 17846681

Auteurs

Masakazu Shimada (M)

Division of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan. masakazu42710@gmail.com.

Chenxu Huang (C)

The Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiosawa, Hachioji- shi, Tokyo, Japan.

Satoshi Yamakawa (S)

The Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiosawa, Hachioji- shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Hiromichi Fujie (H)

The Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiosawa, Hachioji- shi, Tokyo, Japan.

Sawako Murakami (S)

Division of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan.

Nobuo Kanno (N)

Division of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan.

Yasushi Hara (Y)

Division of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan.

Classifications MeSH