The potato rhizosphere microbiota correlated to the yield of three different regions in Korea.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Feb 2024
24 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
19
12
2023
accepted:
21
02
2024
medline:
25
2
2024
pubmed:
25
2
2024
entrez:
24
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We examined potato rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities across three regions: Cheongju, Pyeongchang, and Gangneung. These regions have varying soil and climate conditions, resulting in different yields. We found that precipitation was the main limiting factor in our study while soil physiochemical factors affect bacterial and fungal microbiota in correlation with yield. Both bacterial and fungal microbiota showed distinct patterns according to the regions. ASVs positively correlated with yield were predominantly found in the Pyeongchang region which also produced the highest yields, while ASVs negatively correlated with yield were associated with Gangneung where the lowest yields were observed. The greatest bacterial and fungal diversity was detected in Pyeongchang consisting of Propionibacteriales, Burkholderiales, and Vicinamibacteriales. Gangneung, on the other hand primarily belong to Sordariales, Mortierellales, Cystofilobasidiales, and Tremellales. The putative yield-negative ASVs detected in Gangneung may have been influenced by drought stress. This work has highlighted key bacterial and fungal taxa as well as core taxa that may potentially be associated with high and low yields of potato in relation to metadata which includes soil chemical and physical parameters as well as weather data. Taken together we suggest that this information can be used to assess site suitability for potato production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38402369
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55263-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-55263-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4536Subventions
Organisme : Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea
ID : PJ014866032021
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council,United Kingdom
ID : BB/X010953/1
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Zaheer, K. & Akhtar, M. H. Potato production, usage, and nutrition—a review. Crc. Rev. Food Sci. 56(5), 711–721 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.724479
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WEF &WHO. The stage of food security and nutrition in the world 2022. In Repurposing Food And Agricultural Policies to Make Healty Diets More Affordable. Rome, FAO (2022).
Hijmans, R. J. & Spooner, D. M. Geographic distribution of wild potato species. Am. J. Bot. 88, 2101–2112 (2001).
pubmed: 21669641
doi: 10.2307/3558435
RDA, National academy of agricultural science, Potato- The agricultural technology. 31, Preprint at https://www.nongsaro.go.kr/portal/ps/psb/psbx/cropEbookLst.ps?menuId=PS65290&stdPrdlstCode=FC&sStdPrdlstCode=FC050501# (in Korean) (2018).
Schlaeppi, K. & Bulgarelli, D. The plant microbiome at work. Mol. Plant MIicrobe 28(3), 212–217 (2015).
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-14-0334-FI
Singh, B. K. et al. Crop microbiome and sustainable agriculture. Microbiology 2020, 18 (2020).
Kent, A. D. & Triplett, E. W. Microbial communities and their interactions in soil and rhizosphere ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 211–236 (2002).
pubmed: 12142496
doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.161120
Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H. & Sessitsch, A. A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions and emerging trends in microbial application. J. Adv. Res. 19, 29–37 (2019).
pubmed: 31341667
pmcid: 6630030
doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004
Barnett, B. A. et al. Site and clone effects on the potato root-associated core microbiome and its relationship to tuber yield and nutrients. Am. J. Potato Res. 92(1), 1–9 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s12230-014-9405-9
Zhang, W. et al. Soil bacterial biomass and diversity are affected by different furrow-ridge mulched management systems during potato continuous cropping. BioRxiv 2018, 394551 (2018).
Zimudzi, J. et al. Temporal shifts of fungal communities in the rhizosphere and on tubers in potato fields. Fungal Biol. 122(9), 928–934 (2018).
pubmed: 30115327
doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.05.008
Buchholz, F. et al. 16S rRNA gene-based microbiome analysis identifies candidate bacterial strains that increase the storage time of potato tubers. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–12 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82181-9
Akimbekov, N. et al. The effect of leonardite-derived amendments on soil microbiome structure and potato yield. Agriculture 10(5), 147 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/agriculture10050147
Song, J. et al. Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated under Bacillus subtilis treatment influence the quality of potato tubers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22(21), 12065 (2021).
pubmed: 34769506
pmcid: 8584837
doi: 10.3390/ijms222112065
Hou, Q. et al. Rhizosphere microbial diversity and community dynamics during potato cultivation. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 98, 103176 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2020.103176
Xiao, H., Bonierbale, M., Williams, M. & Veilleux, R. E. Exploring candidate genes and rhizosphere microbiome in relation to iron cycling in Andean potatoes. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/77917/Xiao_H_D_2017.pdf#page=106 (2017).
Bushnell, J. The relation of temperature to growth and respiration in the potato plant. In Technical Bulletin, vol. 34 15–27 (University Farm, St.Paul, 1925).
Kim, Y. U. & Lee, B. W. Effect of high temperature, daylength, and reduced solar radiation on potato growth and yield. Korean J. Agric. For. Meteorol. 18(2), 74–87 (2016).
doi: 10.5532/KJAFM.2016.18.2.74
RDA. National academy of agricultural science, The standards for fertilization for crop cultivation, http://www.pungnong.co.kr/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/unnamed-file.pdf (in Korean) (2010).
Peiffer, J. A. et al. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(16), 6548–6553 (2013).
pubmed: 23576752
pmcid: 3631645
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302837110
Sugiyama, A. et al. Changes in the bacterial community of soybean rhizospheres during growth in the field. PloS One 9(6), e100709 (2014).
pubmed: 24955843
pmcid: 4067361
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100709
Schlemper, T. R. et al. Rhizobacterial community structure differences among sorghum cultivars in different growth stages and soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93, 8 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix096
Kong, X. et al. Maize (Zea mays L Sp) varieties significantly influence bacterial and fungal community in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and phyllosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 96, 3 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa020
Gkarmiri, K. et al. Identifying the active microbiome associated with roots and rhizosphere soil of oilseed rape. Appl. Environ. Microb. 83(22), e01938-e2017 (2017).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01938-17
Custer, G. F., van Diepen, L. T. A. & Stump, W. An examination of fungal and bacterial assemblages in bulk and rhizosphere soils under Solanum tuberosum in Southeastern Wyoming, USA. Appl. Microbiol. 1(2), 162–176 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/applmicrobiol1020013
Chifetete, V. W. & Dames, J. F. Mycorrhizal interventions for sustainable potato production in Africa. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 593053 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.593053
James, N. M. et al. Assessment of soil fertility and potato crop nutrient status in central and eastern highlands of Kenya. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–11 (2020).
Ahmed, J. et al. Potato phosphorus response in soils with high value of phosphorus. Agriculture 10(7), 458 (2020).
Marketa, S. M. et al. Tuberosphere and bulk soil microbial communities in fields differing in common scab severity are distinguished by soil chemistry and interactions with pathogens. Plant Soil 468, 259–275 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-05128-z
Jeanne, T., Parent, S. É. & Hogue, R. Using a soil bacterial species balance index to estimate potato crop productivity. PLoS One 14(3), e0214089 (2019).
pubmed: 30901358
pmcid: 6430509
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214089
Wu, N., Li, Z., Meng, S. & Wu, F. Soil properties and microbial community in the rhizosphere of Populus alba var. pyramidalis along a chronosequence. Microbiol. Res. 250, 126812 (2021).
pubmed: 34246038
doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126812
Ayangbenro, A. S. & Babalola, O. O. Reclamation of arid and semi-arid soils : The role of plant growth-promoting archaea and bacteria. Curr. Plant Biol. 25, 100173 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100173
Vio, S. A. et al. Paraburkholderia. In Beneficial Microbes in Agro-Ecology 271–311 (Academic Press, 2020).
Tapia-García, E. Y. et al. Plant growth-promoting bacteria isolated from wild legume nodules and nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris L. trap plants in central and southern Mexico. Microbiol. Res. 239, 126522 (2020).
pubmed: 32585580
doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126522
Xiao, X. et al. Interactions of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and soil factors in two leguminous plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101(23), 8485–8497 (2017).
pubmed: 29038972
doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8550-8
Saharan, B. S. & Nehra, V. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A critical review. Life Sci. Med. Res. 21(1), 30 (2011).
Lin, Y., Ye, G. & Kuzyakov, Y. Long-term manure application increases soil organic matter and aggregation, and alters microbial community structure and keystone taxa. Soil Biol. Biochem. 134, 187–196 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.030
Liang, Y. et al. Increase in carbohydrate content and variation in microbiome are related to the drought tolerance of Codonopsis pilosula. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 165, 19–35 (2021).
pubmed: 34034158
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.004
Fuchslueger, L. et al. Experimental drought reduces the transfer of recently fixed plant carbon to soil microbes and alters the bacterial community composition in a mountain meadow. New Phytol. 201, 916–927 (2014).
pubmed: 24171922
doi: 10.1111/nph.12569
Chen, Y. et al. Current studies of the effects of drought stress on root exudates and rhizosphere microbiomes of crop plant species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 2374 (2022).
pubmed: 35216487
pmcid: 8874553
doi: 10.3390/ijms23042374
Faist, H. et al. Potato root-associated microbiomes adapt to combined water and nutrient limitation and have a plant genotype-specific role for plant stress mitigation. Res. Sq. 2021, 1–33 (2021).
Lai, T. et al. The response of growth and patulin production of postharvest pathogen Penicillium expansum to exogenous potassium phosphite treatment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 244, 1–10 (2017).
pubmed: 28042969
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.12.017
Chen, J. et al. The antagonism of Penicillium griseofulvum CF3 against soil-borne fungal pathogens of potato and its growth-promoting effect on the plant. Acta Phytophyl. Sin. 40(4), 301–308 (2013).
Martínez-Arias, C. et al. Changes in plant function and root microbiome caused by flood and drought in a riparian tree. Tree Physiol. 40(7), 886–903 (2020).
pubmed: 32175581
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa031
Xu, L. & Coleman-Derr, D. Causes and consequences of a conserved bacterial root microbiome response to drought stress. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 49, 1–6 (2019).
pubmed: 31454709
doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.07.003
Zhang, Y., Crous, P. W., Schoch, C. L. & Hyde, K. D. Pleosporales. Fungal Divers. 53(1), 1–221 (2012).
pubmed: 23097638
doi: 10.1007/s13225-011-0117-x
Salgado-Salazar, C. et al. Lifestyle, mating type and mitochondrial genome features of the plant pathogen Calonectria hawksworthii (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) as revealed by genome analyses. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 44(5), 723–736 (2022).
doi: 10.1080/07060661.2022.2065534
Ozimek, E. & Hanaka, A. Mortierella species as the plant growth-promoting fungi present in the agricultural soils. Agriculture 11(1), 7 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/agriculture11010007
Neu, A. T., Allen, E. E. & Roy, K. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: Challenges and prospects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(51), e2104429118 (2021).
pubmed: 34862327
pmcid: 8713806
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104429118
Pfeiffer, S. et al. Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated in the High Andes show stable and dynamic core microbiomes with different responses to plant development. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93(2), 242 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw242
RDA (Rural development administration). Methods of soil chemical analysis. In National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea (in Korean) (1988).
Gavlak, R., Horneck, D. & Miller, R. O. Particle size analysis: Hydrometer method. In Soil, Plant and Water Reference Methods for the Western Region 128130 (Springer, 2005).
Derek, G. G., Ty, P. A. F., Kelly, R. T. & Amy, K. R. Hydrologic-process-based soil texture classifications for improved visualization of landscape function. Plos One 10(6), e0131299 (2015).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131299
Turner, S., Pryer, K. M., Miao, V. P. W. & Palmer, J. D. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among Cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J. Eukaryot. 46(4), 327–338 (1999).
doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04612.x
Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R. & Weber, L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. AME 75, 129–137 (2015).
doi: 10.3354/ame01753
Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 2(2), 113–118 (1993).
pubmed: 8180733
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x