Spot-scanning proton therapy for early breast cancer in free breathing versus deep inspiration breath-hold.


Journal

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
ISSN: 1651-226X
Titre abrégé: Acta Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8709065

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 23 11 2023
accepted: 13 12 2023
medline: 26 2 2024
pubmed: 26 2 2024
entrez: 26 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Proton therapy for breast cancer is usually given in free breathing (FB). With the use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique, the location of the heart is displaced inferiorly, away from the internal mammary nodes and, thus, the dose to the heart can potentially be reduced. The aim of this study was to explore the potential benefit of proton therapy in DIBH compared to FB for highly selected patients to reduce exposure of the heart and other organs at risk. We aimed at creating proton plans with delivery times feasible with treatment in DIBH. Sixteen patients with left-sided breast cancer receiving loco-regional proton therapy were included. The FB and DIBH plans were created for each patient using spot-scanning proton therapy with 2-3 fields, robust and single field optimization. For the DIBH plans, minimum monitor unit per spot and spot spacing were increased to reduce treatment delivery time. All plans complied with target coverage constraints. The median mean heart dose was statistically significant reduced from 1.1 to 0.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) by applying DIBH. No statistical significant difference was seen for mean dose and V17Gy RBE to the ipsilateral lung. The median treatment delivery time for the DIBH plans was reduced by 27% compared to the FB plans without compromising the plan quality. The median absolute reduction in dose to the heart was limited. Proton treatment in DIBH may only be relevant for a subset of these patients with the largest reduction in heart exposure.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
Proton therapy for breast cancer is usually given in free breathing (FB). With the use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique, the location of the heart is displaced inferiorly, away from the internal mammary nodes and, thus, the dose to the heart can potentially be reduced. The aim of this study was to explore the potential benefit of proton therapy in DIBH compared to FB for highly selected patients to reduce exposure of the heart and other organs at risk. We aimed at creating proton plans with delivery times feasible with treatment in DIBH.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
Sixteen patients with left-sided breast cancer receiving loco-regional proton therapy were included. The FB and DIBH plans were created for each patient using spot-scanning proton therapy with 2-3 fields, robust and single field optimization. For the DIBH plans, minimum monitor unit per spot and spot spacing were increased to reduce treatment delivery time.
RESULTS RESULTS
All plans complied with target coverage constraints. The median mean heart dose was statistically significant reduced from 1.1 to 0.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) by applying DIBH. No statistical significant difference was seen for mean dose and V17Gy RBE to the ipsilateral lung. The median treatment delivery time for the DIBH plans was reduced by 27% compared to the FB plans without compromising the plan quality.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
The median absolute reduction in dose to the heart was limited. Proton treatment in DIBH may only be relevant for a subset of these patients with the largest reduction in heart exposure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38404218
doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.28591
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

56-61

Auteurs

Line Bjerregaard Stick (LB)

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. linsti@rm.dk.

Louise Lærke Nielsen (LL)

The Education of Radiography, University College Lillebælt, Svendborg, Denmark.

Cecilia Bui Trinh (CB)

The Education of Radiography, University College Lillebælt, Svendborg, Denmark.

Ihsan Bahij (I)

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Maria Fuglsang Jensen (MF)

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Camilla Jensenius Skovhus Kronborg (CJS)

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Stine Elleberg Petersen (SE)

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Linh My Hoang Thai (LMH)

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

May-Lin Martinsen (ML)

The Education of Radiography, University College Lillebælt, Svendborg, Denmark.

Helle Precht (H)

Health Sciences Research Center, University College Lillebælt, Svendborg, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Lillebælt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.

Birgitte Vrou Offersen (BV)

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology & Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH