Clarification on the understanding of contrast theory in relation to the article "ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering": comment.


Journal

Biomedical optics express
ISSN: 2156-7085
Titre abrégé: Biomed Opt Express
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101540630

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 01 09 2023
revised: 06 10 2023
accepted: 06 10 2023
medline: 26 2 2024
pubmed: 26 2 2024
entrez: 26 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We are writing to address errors of misrepresentation in the article "ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering" [Biomed. Opt. Express14, 2618 (2023)10.1364/BOE.489117]. In their investigation of predictions of "contrast theory" to explain the efficacy of diffusion optics technology (DOT), a myopia control lens design [Br. J. Ophthalmol.107, 1709 (2023)10.1136/bjo-2021-321005], Breher et al. incorrectly indicated that our contrast theory proposed that the association between cone opsin gene splicing defects and myopia was due to differential involvement in ON- and OFF-visual pathways. In addition, the Authors write that we have "hypothesized enhanced ON contrast sensitivity in myopes," but we predict the opposite.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38404354
doi: 10.1364/BOE.504315
pii: 504315
pmc: PMC10890850
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comment

Langues

eng

Pagination

789-792

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

P: JN and MN are authors of patents on methods of myopia control held by the Medical College of Wisconsin and the University of Washington.

Auteurs

Jay Neitz (J)

University of Washington, Department of Ophthalmology, 750 Republican St., Seattle, WA 98102, USA.

Maureen Neitz (M)

University of Washington, Department of Ophthalmology, 750 Republican St., Seattle, WA 98102, USA.

Classifications MeSH