Clarification on the understanding of contrast theory in relation to the article "ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering": comment.
Journal
Biomedical optics express
ISSN: 2156-7085
Titre abrégé: Biomed Opt Express
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101540630
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2024
01 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
01
09
2023
revised:
06
10
2023
accepted:
06
10
2023
medline:
26
2
2024
pubmed:
26
2
2024
entrez:
26
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We are writing to address errors of misrepresentation in the article "ON and OFF receptive field processing in the presence of optical scattering" [Biomed. Opt. Express14, 2618 (2023)10.1364/BOE.489117]. In their investigation of predictions of "contrast theory" to explain the efficacy of diffusion optics technology (DOT), a myopia control lens design [Br. J. Ophthalmol.107, 1709 (2023)10.1136/bjo-2021-321005], Breher et al. incorrectly indicated that our contrast theory proposed that the association between cone opsin gene splicing defects and myopia was due to differential involvement in ON- and OFF-visual pathways. In addition, the Authors write that we have "hypothesized enhanced ON contrast sensitivity in myopes," but we predict the opposite.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38404354
doi: 10.1364/BOE.504315
pii: 504315
pmc: PMC10890850
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comment
Langues
eng
Pagination
789-792Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Optica Publishing Group.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
P: JN and MN are authors of patents on methods of myopia control held by the Medical College of Wisconsin and the University of Washington.