Peer Support for Type 2 Diabetes Management in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): A Scoping Review.

Cardiometabolic Low and middle income Peer support Scoping review Type 2 diabetes

Journal

Global heart
ISSN: 2211-8179
Titre abrégé: Glob Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101584391

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 23 05 2023
accepted: 25 01 2024
medline: 26 2 2024
pubmed: 26 2 2024
entrez: 26 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although there is evidence of peer support in high-income countries, the use of peer support as an intervention for cardiometabolic disease management, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM), in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), is unclear. A scoping review methodology was used to search the databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, LILACS, CDSR, and CENTRAL. Twenty-eight studies were included in this scoping review. Of these, 67% were developed in Asia, 22% in Africa, and 11% in the Americas. The definition of peer support varied; however, peer support offered a social and emotional dimension to help individuals cope with negative emotions and barriers while promoting disease management. Findings from this scopingreview highlight a lack of consistency in defining peer support as a component of CMD management in LMICs. A clear definition of peer support and ongoing program evaluation is recommended for future research.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Although there is evidence of peer support in high-income countries, the use of peer support as an intervention for cardiometabolic disease management, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM), in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), is unclear.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A scoping review methodology was used to search the databases MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, LILACS, CDSR, and CENTRAL.
Results UNASSIGNED
Twenty-eight studies were included in this scoping review. Of these, 67% were developed in Asia, 22% in Africa, and 11% in the Americas. The definition of peer support varied; however, peer support offered a social and emotional dimension to help individuals cope with negative emotions and barriers while promoting disease management.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Findings from this scopingreview highlight a lack of consistency in defining peer support as a component of CMD management in LMICs. A clear definition of peer support and ongoing program evaluation is recommended for future research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38404615
doi: 10.5334/gh.1299
pmc: PMC10885823
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Diana Sherifali (D)

McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Lilian Pinto da Silva (LP)

Faculty of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Pooja Dewan (P)

British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

F Aaysha Cader (FA)

Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital & Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Zainab Dakhil (Z)

Ibn Al-Bitar Cardiac Centre, Al-Kindy College of Medicine/University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Bishal Gyawali (B)

Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sheila Klassen (S)

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Israa Fadhil Yaseen (IF)

Baghdad Heart Center, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq.

Milos Jovkovic (M)

McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Saira Khalid (S)

McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis (D)

McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Paige Alliston (P)

McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Megan Racey (M)

McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Classifications MeSH