Moral Distress in Radiation Oncology: Insights From Residents in Germany.


Journal

Advances in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2452-1094
Titre abrégé: Adv Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101677247

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 15 05 2023
accepted: 12 09 2023
medline: 26 2 2024
pubmed: 26 2 2024
entrez: 26 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Being challenged by circumstances that force one to act in discordance with one's moral compass can lead to moral distress. The phenomenon has been widely investigated among nurses. This study was designed to shed some light on the situation of resident physicians in radiation oncology. To gain insight into moral distress among residents in radiation oncology, a web-based questionnaire was developed and distributed throughout Germany. Participants were asked to evaluate possible burdensome situations and different options for relief. To outline the main issues of moral distress, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Relief options were examined by frequencies. The factor analysis yielded lack of time, contradiction between patient request and indication, nonmedical interests, and decisions between curative treatment and best supportive care as main issues for the 84 participants. Support from supervisors and senior physicians, as well as exchanges with resident colleagues were indicated as forms of relief. Professional support, such as ethics consultations, structured conversation groups (Balint), or psychological case supervisions, were rated as less helpful, although most participants reported a lack of experience with these. The results are in accordance with existing assumptions that moral distress among physicians is mainly due to uncertainty. Regarding radiation oncology residents in particular, moral distress seems to be related to uncertainty in decisions and conflicts about treatment options. Although senior physicians and supervisors present important role models in dealing with moral distress, professional services such as ethics consultations offer an opportunity for relief that can still be expanded.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38405316
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101378
pii: S2452-1094(23)00206-3
pmc: PMC10885585
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101378

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors hereby declare, that none of them has any competing financial or nonfinancial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work.

Auteurs

Ricarda Peters (R)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Annette Rogge (A)

Paracelsus Nordseeklinik Helgoland, Helgoland, Germany.

Jürgen Dunst (J)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Sandra Freitag-Wolf (S)

Institut für Medizinische Informatik und Statistik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Claudia Schmalz (C)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Classifications MeSH