An Analysis of Medical Student PubMed-Indexed Research Productivity and Factors Associated With Matching at Top-Ranked Ophthalmology Residency Programs.

medical student outcomes ophthalmology match ophthalmology residency pubmed database sf match

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
accepted: 23 01 2024
medline: 26 2 2024
pubmed: 26 2 2024
entrez: 26 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background Limited information exists regarding the research productivity of matched ophthalmology applicants given that ophthalmology residencies do not participate in the National Residency Match Program. Objectives This study determines the research productivity characteristics of matched ophthalmology applicants and variables associated with matching to higher-tier ophthalmology residency programs. Methods Medical school, matched residency program, and applicant-specific PubMed-indexed research productivity (including consideration for first-author publications, relevance to ophthalmology, and acceptance before application submission date) for 2020-2021 matched ophthalmology applicants were collected from publicly available websites. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi-squared tests and t-tests to compare research productivity between groups (gender, medical school tier, and ophthalmology residency program Doximity rank). Multivariate regression was used to analyze research factors associated with matching at the top 20 Doximity-ranked ophthalmology residency programs. Results Three hundred ninety-three matched ophthalmology applicants for the 2020-2021 academic year were analyzed with an average of 2.4 ± 3.1 (median: 1 {0-3}) publications, 1.0 ± 2.1 (median: 0 {0-1}) ophthalmic publications, 0.8 ± 1.4 (median: 0 {0-1}) first-author publications, and 0.5 ± 1.1 (median: 0 {0-1}) ophthalmic first-author publications. The applicants who matched at the top 20 Doximity-ranked ophthalmology residency programs were more likely to matriculate from the top 40 medical schools (63% versus 22%, p < 0.001), have more first-author publications at the time of application submission (1.1 ± 1.6 versus 0.7 ± 1.3, p = 0.044), and have more projects resulting in publications after submission (2.0 ± 2.5 versus 1.4 ± 2.3, p = 0.048). In multivariate regression, attendance at a top 40 medical school (adjusted odds ratio {aOR} = 6.07, 95% confidence interval {CI}: 3.56-10.5, p < 0.001) was a significant predictor of matching at a top 20 Doximity ophthalmology residency program, and no variables associated with research productivity were significant predictors. Conclusions There has been a consistent increase in research productivity among matched ophthalmology applicants. However, in multivariate analysis, the medical school tier was the only significant variable for matching at top-tier programs. More nuanced studies regarding the effect of research productivity on ophthalmology applicants are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38406078
doi: 10.7759/cureus.52824
pmc: PMC10884363
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e52824

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Rasendran et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Chandruganesh Rasendran (C)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.

Sanjana Murali (S)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.

Nithya Kanagasegar (N)

Department of General Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Manasvee Kapadia (M)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.

Jonathan Lass (J)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.

Linda Ohsie-Bajor (L)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.

Classifications MeSH