Physical activity self-efficacy online intervention for adults with obesity: protocol for a feasibility study.
Exercise
Information and communication technology
Internet
eHealth
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Feb 2024
26 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
14
08
2023
accepted:
16
02
2024
medline:
27
2
2024
pubmed:
27
2
2024
entrez:
26
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Even without weight loss, adults with obesity can greatly benefit from regular physical activity. The Physical Activity Self-efficacy (PAS) intervention is an online behavioral intervention newly developed to promote physical activity in adults with obesity by providing capability-enhancing learning opportunities. The objective of this manuscript is to describe the protocol for a feasibility study designed to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the PAS online intervention for adults with obesity recruited from a local weight management center in the United States of America (USA). The study design is a prospective, double-blind, parallel-group individual randomized pilot trial. Thirty participants will be randomly assigned to the PAS group or usual care group to achieve a 1:1 group assignment. Recruitment of participants is scheduled to begin on 1 March 2024 at a local weight management center within a private healthcare system in the USA. There are six eligibility criteria for participation in this study (e.g., a body mass index ≥ 25.00 kg/m Results are intended to inform the preparation of a future definitive randomized controlled trial. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05935111, registered 7 July 2023.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Even without weight loss, adults with obesity can greatly benefit from regular physical activity. The Physical Activity Self-efficacy (PAS) intervention is an online behavioral intervention newly developed to promote physical activity in adults with obesity by providing capability-enhancing learning opportunities. The objective of this manuscript is to describe the protocol for a feasibility study designed to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the PAS online intervention for adults with obesity recruited from a local weight management center in the United States of America (USA).
METHODS
METHODS
The study design is a prospective, double-blind, parallel-group individual randomized pilot trial. Thirty participants will be randomly assigned to the PAS group or usual care group to achieve a 1:1 group assignment. Recruitment of participants is scheduled to begin on 1 March 2024 at a local weight management center within a private healthcare system in the USA. There are six eligibility criteria for participation in this study (e.g., a body mass index ≥ 25.00 kg/m
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Results are intended to inform the preparation of a future definitive randomized controlled trial.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05935111, registered 7 July 2023.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38409075
doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01468-6
pii: 10.1186/s40814-024-01468-6
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05935111']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
40Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Burgess E, Hassmén P, Pumpa KL. Determinants of adherence to lifestyle intervention in adults with obesity: a systematic review. Clin Obes. 2017;7(3):123–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12183 .
doi: 10.1111/cob.12183
pubmed: 28296261
Leone LA, Ward DS. A mixed methods comparison of perceived benefits and barriers to exercise between obese and nonobese women. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10(4):461. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.10.4.461 .
doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.4.461
pubmed: 23714626
pmcid: 3904548
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018. https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/PAG_Advisory_Committee_Report.pdf . Accessed 30 Jul2023.
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Report of the physical activity guidelines advisory committee, 2008. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/paguide.pdf . Accessed 30 Jul 2023.
Ul-Haq Z, Mackay DF, Fenwick E, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between body mass index and health-related quality of life among adults, assessed by the SF-36. Obesity. 2013;21(3):E322-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20107 .
doi: 10.1002/oby.20107
pubmed: 23592685
White RL, Babic MJ, Parker PD, et al. Domain-specific physical activity and mental health: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):653–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.008
pubmed: 28153647
Tran L, Tran P, Tran L. A cross-sectional examination of sociodemographic factors associated with meeting physical activity recommendations in overweight and obese US adults. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2020;14(1):91–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2020.01.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2020.01.002
pubmed: 31948822
Tudor-Locke C, Brashear MM, Johnson WD, et al. Accelerometer profiles of physical activity and inactivity in normal weight, overweight, and obese U.S. men and women. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-60 .
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-60
pubmed: 20682057
pmcid: 2924256
World Health Organization: global recommendations on physical activity for health; 2010. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44399/1/9789241599979_eng . Accessed 30 Jul 2023.
American Heart Association editorial staff. American heart association recommendations for physical activity in adults and kids. American Heart Association; 2018. https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/fitness/fitness-basics/aha-recs-for-physical-activity-in-adults . Accessed 30 Jul 2023.
Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Marques MM, et al. Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0323-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0323-6
pubmed: 25907778
pmcid: 4408562
Schneider J, Malinowski P, Watson PM, et al. The role of mindfulness in physical activity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2019;20(3):448–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12795 .
doi: 10.1111/obr.12795
pubmed: 30468299
McIntosh T, Hunter DJ, Royce S. Barriers to physical activity in obese adults: a rapid evidence assessment. J Res Nurs. 2016;21(4):271–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116647762 .
doi: 10.1177/1744987116647762
Korkiakangas EE, Alahuhta MA, Laitinen JH. Barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(4):416–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap031 .
doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap031
pubmed: 19793763
Napolitano MA, Papandonatos GD, Borradaile KE, et al. Effects of weight status and barriers on physical activity adoption among previously inactive women. Obesity. 2011;19(11):2183–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.87 .
doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.87
pubmed: 21512514
Ball K, Crawford D, Owen N. Obesity as a barrier to physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24(3):331–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb01579.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb01579.x
pubmed: 10937415
Atlantis E, Barnes EH, Ball K. Weight status and perception barriers to healthy physical activity and diet behavior. Int J Obes(Lond). 2008;32(2):343–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803707 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803707
pubmed: 17684508
Egan AM, Mahmood WAW, Fenton R, et al. Barriers to exercise in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Med. 2013;106(7):635–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hct075 .
doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hct075
Piana N, Battistini D, Urbani L, et al. Multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention in the obese: its impact on patients’ perception of the disease, food and physical exercise. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23(4):337–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2011.12.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.12.008
pubmed: 22497979
Peacock JC, Sloan SS, Cripps B. A qualitative analysis of bariatric patients’ post-surgical barriers to exercise. Obes Surg. 2014;24:292–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1088-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1088-7
pubmed: 24092517
Thomas SL, Hyde J, Karunaratne A, et al. “They all work…when you stick to them”: a qualitative investigation of dieting, weight loss, and physical exercise, in obese individuals. Nutr J. 2008;7(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-7-34 .
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-7-34
pubmed: 19025661
pmcid: 2607302
Wiklund M, Olsén MF, Willén C. Physical activity as viewed by adults with severe obesity, awaiting gastric bypass surgery. Physiother Res Int. 2011;16(3):179–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.497 .
doi: 10.1002/pri.497
pubmed: 21061456
Samdal GB, Eide GE, Barth T, et al. Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0494-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0494-y
Olander EK, Fletcher H, Williams S, et al. What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals’ physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-29 .
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-29
Carraça E, Encantado J, Battista F, et al. Effective behavior change techniques to promote physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2021;22:e13258. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13258 .
doi: 10.1111/obr.13258
pubmed: 33949778
pmcid: 8365685
Chin SH, Kahathuduwa CN, Binks M. Physical activity and obesity: what we know and what we need to know. Obes Rev. 2016;17(12):1226–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12460 .
doi: 10.1111/obr.12460
pubmed: 27743411
Lee S, Patel P, Myers ND, et al. A systematic review of eHealth interventions to promote physical activity in adults with obesity or overweight. Behav Med. 2023;49(3):213–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2022.2065239 .
doi: 10.1080/08964289.2022.2065239
pubmed: 35465851
Myers ND, Prilleltensky I, Prilleltensky O, et al. Efficacy of the fun for wellness online intervention to promote multidimensional well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Sci. 2017;18:984–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0779-z .
doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0779-z
pubmed: 28303422
Myers ND, McMahon A, Prilleltensky I, et al. Effectiveness of the fun for wellness web-based behavioral intervention to promote physical activity in adults with obesity (or overweight): randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4(2):e15919. https://doi.org/10.2196/15919 .
doi: 10.2196/15919
pubmed: 32130110
pmcid: 7075548
Myers ND, Prilleltensky I, McMahon A, et al. Effectiveness of the fun for wellness online behavioral intervention to promote subjective well-being in adults with obesity: a randomized controlled trial. J Happiness Stud. 2021;22:1905–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00301-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s10902-020-00301-0
Lee S, McMahon A, Prilleltensky I, et al. Effectiveness of the fun for wellness online behavioral intervention to promote well-being actions in adults with obesity or overweight: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020;43(1):83–96. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2020-0049 .
doi: 10.1123/jsep.2020-0049
pubmed: 33333492
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 .
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
pubmed: 847061
Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13:623–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407422 .
doi: 10.1080/08870449808407422
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 .
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
pubmed: 11148297
Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;21:258–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1
Williams SL, French DP. What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour-and are they the same? Health Educ Res. 2011;26:308–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr005 .
doi: 10.1093/her/cyr005
pubmed: 21321008
Beauchamp MR, Crawford KL, Jackson B. Social cognitive theory and physical activity: mechanisms of behavior change, critique, and legacy. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:110–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.009
Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, et al. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(4):295–309. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008 .
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008
pubmed: 18283207
Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583 .
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
pubmed: 23295957
pmcid: 5114123
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;9:346. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7586 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586
Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomized controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205
pubmed: 26978655
pmcid: 4792418
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomized pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5239 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239
pubmed: 27777223
pmcid: 5076380
Thabane L, Hopewell S, Lancaster GA, et al. Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0065-z .
doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0065-z
pubmed: 27965844
pmcid: 5153862
Billingham SAM, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-104 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104
pubmed: 23961782
pmcid: 3765378
Myers ND, Lee S, Bateman AG, et al. Accelerometer-based assessment of physical activity within the Fun For Wellness online behavioral intervention: protocol for a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0455-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0455-0
Howard VJ, Rhodes D, Mosher A, et al. Obtaining accelerometer data in a national cohort of black and white adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:1531–7. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000549 .
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000549
pubmed: 25333247
pmcid: 4404169
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
Myers ND, Prilleltensky I, Lee S, et al. Effectiveness of the fun for wellness online behavioral intervention to promote well-being and physical activity: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7089-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7089-2
Perski O, Blandford A, West R, et al. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(2):254–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1
pubmed: 27966189
Myers ND, Feltz DL, Wolfe EW. A confirmatory study of rating scale category effectiveness for the coaching efficacy scale. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(3):300–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599493 .
doi: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599493
pubmed: 18816941
Myers ND, Bateman AG, McMahon A, et al. Measurement of physical activity self-efficacy in adults with obesity: a latent variable approach to explore dimensionality, temporal invariance, and external validity. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2021;43(6):497–513. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2021-0040 .
doi: 10.1123/jsep.2021-0040
pubmed: 34794118
McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med. 1993;16:103–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844757 .
doi: 10.1007/BF00844757
pubmed: 8433355
Bateman AG, Myers ND, Feltz DL, et al. The self-efficacy to regulate physical activity scale: exploring the factor structure, temporal invariance, and external validity in a latent variable framework. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2023;7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2218837 .
doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2023.2218837
McAuley E. The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. J Behav Med. 1992;15:65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848378 .
doi: 10.1007/BF00848378
pubmed: 1583674
Scarpa MP, Prilletensky I, McMahon A, et al. Is fun for wellness engaging? Evaluation of user experience of an online intervention to promote well-being and physical activity. Front Comput Sci. 2021;3:690389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.690389 .
doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2021.690389
Wijndaele K, Westgate K, Stephens SK, et al. Utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data: review and expert consensus. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2129–39. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661 .
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661
pubmed: 25785929
pmcid: 4731236
Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, et al. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:357–64. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3 .
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3
pubmed: 20581716
pmcid: 3184184
Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications. Inc accelerometer Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:777–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021 .
doi: 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021
pubmed: 9588623
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–95. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB .
doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
pubmed: 12900694
International Physical Activity Questionnaire Research Committee. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) - short and long forms. 2005. https://sites.google.com/view/ipaq . Accessed 30 Jul 2023.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2017.
Jo B, Ginexi EM, Ialongo NS. Handling missing data in randomized experiments with noncompliance. Prev Sci. 2010;11:384–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0175-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0175-4
pubmed: 20379779
pmcid: 2912956
Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999;319(7211):670–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
pubmed: 10480822
pmcid: 28218
Cerin E, Cain KL, Oyeyemi AL, et al. Correlates of agreement between accelerometry and self-reported physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:1075–84. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870 .
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870
pubmed: 26784274
pmcid: 4868646
The Community Guide. Physical activity: interventions including activity monitors for adults with overweight or obesity. 2017. https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/physical-activity-interventions-including-activity-monitors-adults-overweight-obesity . Accessed 30 Jul 2023
Singal AG, Higgins PDR, Waljee AK. A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2014;5: e45. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2013.13 .
doi: 10.1038/ctg.2013.13
pubmed: 24384867
pmcid: 3912314
Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, et al. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0
pubmed: 27475273
pmcid: 5193005