Analysis of retromuscular drain output and postoperative outcomes for heavyweight versus mediumweight polypropylene mesh following open ventral hernia repair.
Abdominal wall reconstruction
Drain
Heavyweight mesh
Mediumweight
Ventral hernia repair
Journal
Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
ISSN: 1248-9204
Titre abrégé: Hernia
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9715168
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Feb 2024
26 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
22
11
2023
accepted:
21
01
2024
medline:
27
2
2024
pubmed:
27
2
2024
entrez:
27
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Heavyweight polypropylene (HWPP) mesh is thought to increase inflammatory response and delay tissue integration compared to mediumweight (MWPP). Reactive fluid volume (i.e., drain output) may be a reasonable surrogate for integration. We hypothesized that daily drain output is higher with HWPP compared to MWPP in open retromuscular ventral hernia repair (VHR). This is a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted March 2017-April 2019 comparing MWPP and HWPP for VHR. Retromuscular drain output in milliliters was measured at 24-h intervals up to postoperative day seven. Univariate analyses compared differences in daily drain output and time to drain removal. Multivariable analyses compared total drain output and wound morbidity within 30 days and hernia recurrence at 1 year. 288 patients were included; 140 (48.6%) HWPP and 148 (51.4%) MWPP. Daily drain output for days 1-3 was higher for HWPP vs. MWPP (total volume: 837.8 mL vs. 656.5 mL) (p < 0.001), but similar on days 4-7 (p > 0.05). Median drain removal time was 5 days for both groups. Total drain output was not predictive of 30-day wound morbidity (p > 0.05) or hernia recurrence at 1 year (OR 1, p = 0.29). While HWPP mesh initially had higher drain outputs, it rapidly returned to levels similar to MWPP by postoperative day three and there was no difference in clinical outcomes. We believe that drains placed around HWPP mesh can be managed similarly to MWPP mesh.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38409571
doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02972-7
pii: 10.1007/s10029-024-02972-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Weyhe D, Cobb W, Lecuivre J, Alves A, Ladet S, Lomanto D, Bayon Y (2015) Large pore size and controlled mesh elongation are relevant predictors for mesh integration quality and low shrinkage—systematic analysis of key parameters of meshes in a novel minipig hernia model. Int J Surg 22:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.717
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.717
pubmed: 26277532
Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Schumpelick V (1999) Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Eur J Surg 165(7):665–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/11024159950189726
doi: 10.1080/11024159950189726
pubmed: 10452261
Bilsel Y, Abci I (2012) The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh materials and types. Int J Surg 10(6):317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.002
pubmed: 22588090
Schmidbauer S, Ladurner R, Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253
pubmed: 16033714
Moreno-Egea A, Carrillo-Alcaraz A, Soria-Aledo V (2013) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic hernia repair comparing titanium-coated lightweight mesh and medium-weight composite mesh. Surg Endosc 27(1):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2425-y
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2425-y
pubmed: 22773233
Petro CC et al (2015) Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note. Hernia 19(1):155–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1237-5
doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1237-5
pubmed: 24659227
Blair LJ et al (2015) Lightweight vs midweight polypropylene mesh in 948 open ventral hernia repairs (OVHR). J Am Coll Surg 221(4):S73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.162
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.162
Žuvela M, Galun D, Djurić-Stefanović A, Palibrk I, Petrović M, Milićević M (2014) Central rupture and bulging of low-weight polypropylene mesh following recurrent incisional sublay hernioplasty. Hernia 18(1):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1197-1
doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1197-1
pubmed: 24309998
Rosen MJ et al (2022) Biologic vs synthetic mesh for single-stage repair of contaminated ventral hernias: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 157(4):293. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6902
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6902
pubmed: 35044431
pmcid: 8771431
Maskal SM et al (2023) Mediumweight polypropylene mesh fractures after open retromuscular ventral hernia repair: incidence and associated risk factors. Surg Endosc 37:5438–5443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4
pubmed: 37038022
Warren JA, McGrath SP, Hale AL, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM, Cobb WS (2017) Patterns of recurrence and mechanisms of failure after open ventral hernia repair with mesh. Am Surg 83(11):1275–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481708301131
doi: 10.1177/000313481708301131
pubmed: 29183531
Sajid MS, Kalra L, Parampalli U, Sains PS, Baig MK (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of lightweight mesh against heavyweight mesh in influencing the incidence of chronic groin pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 205(6):726–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.046
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.046
pubmed: 23561639
Krpata DM et al (2021) Effect of hernia mesh weights on postoperative patient-related and clinical outcomes after open ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 156(12):1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4309
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4309
pubmed: 34524395
Haskins IN et al (2018) A call for standardization of wound events reporting following ventral hernia repair. Hernia 22(5):729–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1748-6
doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1748-6
pubmed: 29429064
Sadava EE, Krpata DM, Gao Y, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW (2014) Wound healing process and mediators: implications for modulations for hernia repair and mesh integration: wound healing process and mediators. J Biomed Mater Res A 102(1):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34676
doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34676
pubmed: 23629958
Andrades P, Prado A (2007) Composition of postabdominoplasty seroma. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31(5):514–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-0078-3
doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-0078-3
pubmed: 17659406
Bakker WJ, Aufenacker TJ, Boschman JS, Burgmans JPJ (2021) Heavyweight mesh is superior to lightweight mesh in laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 273(5):890–899. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003831
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003831
pubmed: 32224745
Jin J, Schomisch S, Rosen MJ (2009) In vitro evaluation of the permeability of prosthetic meshes as the possible cause of postoperative seroma formation. Surg Innov 16(2):129–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350609337128
doi: 10.1177/1553350609337128
pubmed: 19493920
Pochert N et al (2023) Th2/Th17 cell associated cytokines found in seroma fluids after breast cancer surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308(5):1621–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07074-w
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07074-w
pubmed: 37243864
pmcid: 10520137
Krpata DM et al (2017) Drain placement does not increase infectious complications after retromuscular ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh: an AHSQC analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 21(12):2083–2089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3601-0
doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3601-0
pubmed: 28983795
Lu R et al (2020) Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs. Surg Endosc 34(8):3597–3605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07132-y
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07132-y
pubmed: 31605215
Arora E et al (2022) Are drains useful in eTEP ventral hernia repairs? An AWR surgical collaborative (AWRSC) retrospective study. Surg Endosc 36(10):7295–7301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09121-0
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09121-0
pubmed: 35165760
Miller BT et al (2022) Retromuscular drain versus no drain in robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative. Hernia 27(2):409–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02696-6
doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02696-6
pubmed: 36307620
Marcolin P et al (2023) Drain placement in retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 27(3):519–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02792-1
doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02792-1
pubmed: 37069319
Gurusamy KS, Allen VB (2013) Wound drains after incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD005570. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005570.pub4
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005570.pub4
Kushner B, Smith E, Han B, Otegbeye E, Holden S, Blatnik J (2021) Early drain removal does not increase the rate of surgical site infections following an open transversus abdominis release. Hernia 25(2):411–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02362-9
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02362-9
pubmed: 33400031
pmcid: 8058248
Durai R, Mownah A, Philip CHN (2009) Use of drains in surgery: a review. J Perioper Pract 19(6):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/175045890901900603
doi: 10.1177/175045890901900603
pubmed: 19591322