Effect of a Co-Located Bridging Recovery Initiative on Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder: The BRIDGE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline:
27
2
2024
pubmed:
27
2
2024
entrez:
27
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Co-located bridge clinics aim to facilitate a timely transition to outpatient care for inpatients with opioid use disorder (OUD); however, their effect on hospital length of stay (LOS) and postdischarge outcomes remains unclear. To evaluate the effect of a co-located bridge clinic on hospital LOS among inpatients with OUD. This parallel-group randomized clinical trial recruited 335 adult inpatients with OUD seen by an addiction consultation service and without an existing outpatient clinician to provide medication for OUD (MOUD) between November 25, 2019, and September 28, 2021, at a tertiary care hospital affiliated with a large academic medical center and its bridge clinic. The bridge clinic included enhanced case management before and after hospital discharge, MOUD prescription, and referral to a co-located bridge clinic. Usual care included MOUD prescription and referrals to community health care professionals who provided MOUD. The primary outcome was the index admission LOS. Secondary outcomes, assessed at 16 weeks, were linkage to health care professionals who provided MOUD, MOUD refills, same-center emergency department (ED) and hospital use, recurrent opioid use, quality of life (measured by the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10), overdose, mortality, and cost. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Of 335 participants recruited (167 randomized to the bridge clinic and 168 to usual care), the median age was 38.0 years (IQR, 31.9-45.7 years), and 194 (57.9%) were male. The median LOS did not differ between arms (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.65-1.37]; P = .74). At the 16-week follow-up, participants referred to the bridge clinic had fewer hospital-free days (AOR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.32-0.92]), more readmissions (AOR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.25-3.76]), and higher care costs (AOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.51-3.35]), with no differences in ED visits (AOR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.68-1.94]) or deaths (AOR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.08-2.72]) compared with those receiving usual care. Follow-up calls were completed for 88 participants (26.3%). Participants referred to the bridge clinic were more likely to receive linkage to health care professionals who provided MOUD (AOR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.32-4.26]) and have more MOUD refills (AOR, 6.17 [95% CI, 3.69-10.30]) and less likely to experience an overdose (AOR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.03-0.41]). This randomized clinical trial found that among inpatients with OUD, bridge clinic referrals did not improve hospital LOS. Referrals may improve outpatient metrics but with higher resource use and expenditure. Bending the cost curve may require broader community and regional partnerships. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04084392.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38411964
pii: 2815475
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56430
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04084392']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2356430Investigateurs
Gordon R Bernard
(GR)
Robert S Dittus
(RS)
Shon Dwyer
(S)
Peter J Embi
(PJ)
Chad Fitzgerald
(C)
Robert E Freundlich
(RE)
Frank E Harrell
(FE)
Paul A Harris
(PA)
Tina Hartert
(T)
Jim Hayman
(J)
Catherine H Ivory
(CH)
Ruth Kleinpell
(R)
Sunil Kripalani
(S)
Lee Ann Liska
(LA)
Patrick Luther
(P)
Jay Morrison
(J)
Thomas Nantais
(T)
Jill M Pulley
(JM)
Kris Rehm
(K)
Russell L Rothman
(RL)
Patti Runyan
(P)
Wesley H Self
(WH)
Matthew W Semler
(MW)
Robin Steaban
(R)
Cosby A Stone
(CA)
Philip D Walker
(PD)
Consuelo H Wilkins
(CH)
Adam Wright
(A)
Autumn D Zuckerman
(AD)