Determinants of COVID-19 Infection Among Employees of an Italian Financial Institution.


Journal

La Medicina del lavoro
ISSN: 0025-7818
Titre abrégé: Med Lav
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0401176

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 03 05 2023
accepted: 11 01 2024
medline: 27 2 2024
pubmed: 27 2 2024
entrez: 27 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Understanding the trend of the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is becoming crucial. Previous studies focused on predicting COVID-19 trends, but few papers have considered models for disease estimation and progression based on large real-world data. We used de-identified data from 60,938 employees of a major financial institution in Italy with daily COVID-19 status information between 31 March 2020 and 31 August 2021. We consider six statuses: (i) concluded case, (ii) confirmed case, (iii) close contact, (iv) possible-probable contact, (v) possible contact, and (vi) no-COVID-19 or infection. We conducted a logistic regression to assess the odds ratio (OR) of transition to confirmed COVID-19 case at each time point. We also fitted a general model for disease progression via the multi-state transition probability model at each time point, with lags of 7 and 15 days. Employment in a branch versus in a central office was the strongest predictor of case or contact status, while no association was detected with gender or age. The geographic prevalence of possible-probable contacts and close contacts was predictive of the subsequent risk of confirmed cases. The status with the highest probability of becoming a confirmed case was concluded case (12%) in April 2020, possible-probable contact (16%) in November 2020, and close contact (4%) in August 2021. The model based on transition probabilities predicted well the rate of confirmed cases observed 7 or 15 days later. Data from industry-based surveillance systems may effectively predict the risk of subsequent infection.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Understanding the trend of the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is becoming crucial. Previous studies focused on predicting COVID-19 trends, but few papers have considered models for disease estimation and progression based on large real-world data.
METHODS METHODS
We used de-identified data from 60,938 employees of a major financial institution in Italy with daily COVID-19 status information between 31 March 2020 and 31 August 2021. We consider six statuses: (i) concluded case, (ii) confirmed case, (iii) close contact, (iv) possible-probable contact, (v) possible contact, and (vi) no-COVID-19 or infection. We conducted a logistic regression to assess the odds ratio (OR) of transition to confirmed COVID-19 case at each time point. We also fitted a general model for disease progression via the multi-state transition probability model at each time point, with lags of 7 and 15 days.
RESULTS RESULTS
Employment in a branch versus in a central office was the strongest predictor of case or contact status, while no association was detected with gender or age. The geographic prevalence of possible-probable contacts and close contacts was predictive of the subsequent risk of confirmed cases. The status with the highest probability of becoming a confirmed case was concluded case (12%) in April 2020, possible-probable contact (16%) in November 2020, and close contact (4%) in August 2021. The model based on transition probabilities predicted well the rate of confirmed cases observed 7 or 15 days later.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Data from industry-based surveillance systems may effectively predict the risk of subsequent infection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38411980
doi: 10.23749/mdl.v115i1.14690
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2024007

Auteurs

Roberta De Vito (R)

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Martina Menzio (M)

Direzione Centrale Data Office, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence, Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy.

Pierluigi Laqua (P)

Direzione Centrale Data Office, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence, Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy.

Stefano Castellari (S)

Direzione Centrale Data Office, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence, Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy.

Alberto Colognese (A)

Direzione Centrale Data Office, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence, Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy.

Giulia Collatuzzo (G)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Dario Russignaga (D)

Tutela Aziendale, Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy.

Paolo Boffetta (P)

Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH