Sibling comparisons, sibling relationship quality, and perceived sport competence in young athletes.
Dyadic analysis
Relationship conflict
Relationship warmth
Sibling relationships
Social comparison
Youth sport
Journal
Psychology of sport and exercise
ISSN: 1878-5476
Titre abrégé: Psychol Sport Exerc
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101088724
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Feb 2024
25 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
12
09
2023
revised:
14
02
2024
accepted:
15
02
2024
medline:
28
2
2024
pubmed:
28
2
2024
entrez:
27
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Siblings are overlooked, yet potentially meaningful social agents in youth sport. To better understand the role of siblings in youth sport, we examined the association between sibling sport-referenced comparisons, relationship qualities, and perceived sport competence. The tendency to make sibling comparisons was expected to be positively related to sport competence perceptions and this association was further expected to be moderated by markers of sibling relationship quality. Participants were 47 sport-involved sibling dyads that included older siblings (25 female, 22 male, M
Identifiants
pubmed: 38412908
pii: S1469-0292(24)00024-4
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102613
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102613Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Given their role as an Editorial Board Member Smith A.L., had no involvement in the peer-review of this article and had no access to information regarding its peer-review. We have no known conflict of interest to disclose. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.