Evaluation of "appropriate use criteria" for surgical decision-making in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. A controlled, multicentre, prospective observational study.
Appropriate use criteria
Degenerative spondylolisthesis
Outcome
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Feb 2024
28 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
15
10
2023
accepted:
03
01
2024
revised:
22
12
2023
medline:
28
2
2024
pubmed:
28
2
2024
entrez:
28
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Selecting patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) for surgery is difficult. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) have been developed to clarify the indications for LDS surgery but have not been evaluated in controlled studies. This prospective, controlled, multicentre study involved 908 patients (561 surgical and 347 non-surgical controls; 69.5 ± 9.7y; 69% female), treated as per normal clinical practice. Their appropriateness for surgery was afterwards determined using the AUC. They completed the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) at baseline and 12 months' follow-up. Multiple regression adjusting for confounders evaluated the influence of appropriateness designation and treatment received on the 12-month COMI and achievement of MCIC (≥ 2.2-point-reduction). As per convention, appropriate (A) and uncertain (U) groups were combined for comparison with the inappropriate (I) group. For the adjusted 12-month COMI, the benefit of surgery relative to non-surgical care was not significantly greater for the A/U than the I group (p = 0.189). There was, however, a greater treatment effect of surgery for those with higher baseline COMI (p = 0.035). The groups' adjusted probabilities of achieving MCIC were: 83% (A/U, receiving surgery), 71% (I, receiving surgery), 50% (A/U, receiving non-surgical care), and 32% (I, receiving non-surgical care). A/U patients receiving surgery had the highest chances of achieving MCIC, but the AUC were not able to identify which patients had a greater treatment effect of surgery relative to non-surgical care. The identification of other characteristics that predict a greater treatment effect of surgery, in addition to baseline COMI, is required to improve decision-making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38416192
doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08157-1
pii: 10.1007/s00586-024-08157-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Buckwalter JA, Heckman JD, Petrie DP, AOA (2003) An AOA critical issue: aging of the North American population: new challenges for orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:748–758
Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, Monrad H, Gebuhr P (2007) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective: the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000250979.12398.96 . 00007632–200701010–00019 [pii]
Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA, Fallatah SM, O’Neil J, Wai EK (2007) The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1791–1798
Abdu WA, Sacks OA, Tosteson ANA, Zhao W, Tosteson TD, Morgan TS, Pearson A, Weinstein JN, Lurie JD (2018) Long-term results of surgery compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:1619–1630. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002682
Pearson AM, Lurie JD, Blood EA, Frymoyer JW, Braeutigam H, An H, Girardi FP, Weinstein JN (2008) Spine patient outcomes research trial: radiographic predictors of clinical outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2759–2766
Pearson AM, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Abdu WA, Weinstein JN (2013) Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1799–1811. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a314d0
Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR, Lazaro P, van het Loo M, McDonell J, Vader J, Kahan JP (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE (1986) A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2:53–63
doi: 10.1017/S0266462300002774
pubmed: 10300718
Naylor CD (1998) What is appropriate care? N Engl J Med 338:1918–1920
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806253382612
pubmed: 9637815
Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, McLain R, Shaffer W, Myers M, Glaser J, Hart RA (2005) Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine. Spine 30:2208–2213
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000181057.60012.08
pubmed: 16205348
Mannion AF, Pittet V, Steiger F, Vader JP, Becker HJ, Porchet F (2014) Development of appropriateness criteria for the surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS). Eur Spine J 23:1903–1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3284-0
doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3284-0
pubmed: 24760463
Reitman CA, Cho CH, Bono CM, Ghogawala Z, Glaser J, Kauffman C, Mazanec D, O’Brien D Jr, O’Toole J, Prather H, Resnick D, Schofferman J, Smith MJ, Sullivan W, Tauzell R, Truumees E, Wang J, Watters W 3rd, Wetzel FT, Whitcomb G (2021) Management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: development of appropriate use criteria. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.005
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.005
pubmed: 34749959
Mannion AF, Mariaux F, Pittet V, Steiger F, Aepli M, Fekete TF, Jeszenszky D, O’Riordan D, Porchet F (2021) Association between the appropriateness of surgery, according to appropriate use criteria, and patient-rated outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 30:907–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06725-3
doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06725-3
pubmed: 33575818
Fekete TF, Loibl M, Jeszenszky D, Haschtmann D, Banczerowski P, Kleinstuck FS, Becker HJ, Porchet F, Mannion AF (2018) How does patient-rated outcome change over time following the surgical treatment of degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine? Eur Spine J 27:700–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5358-2
doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5358-2
pubmed: 29080002
Staartjes VE, Siccoli A, de Wispelaere MP, Schröder ML (2019) Patient-reported outcomes unbiased by length of follow-up after lumbar degenerative spine surgery: do we need 2 years of follow-up? Spine J 19:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.004
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.004
pubmed: 30296576
Parai C, Hägg O, Lind B, Brisby H (2019) Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data. Eur Spine J 28:2187–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05989-0
doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05989-0
pubmed: 31041598
Abdeldaiem A, Saweeres ESB, Shehab-Eldien AA, Mannion AF, Rehan Youssef A (2020) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI-back) in patients with non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 29:2413–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06530-4
doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06530-4
pubmed: 32666274
Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück F, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 1. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18:367–373
doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0942-8
pubmed: 19319578
pmcid: 2899316
Mannion AF, Mariaux F, Reitmeir R, Fekete TF, Haschtmann D, Loibl M, Jeszenszky D, Kleinstuck FS, Porchet F, Elfering A (2020) Development of the “Core Yellow Flags Index” (CYFI) as a brief instrument for the assessment of key psychological factors in patients undergoing spine surgery. Eur Spine J 29:1935–1952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06462-z
doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06462-z
pubmed: 32556625
Pochon L, Kleinstuck FS, Porchet F, Mannion AF (2015) Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3
doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3
pubmed: 26143123
Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18:374–379
doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y
pubmed: 19296136
pmcid: 2899314
Andrade C (2020) Mean Difference, Standardized Mean Difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry 81. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13681
Katz JN, Winter AR, Hawker G (2017) Measures of the appropriateness of elective orthopaedic joint and spine procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:e15. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00473
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00473
pubmed: 28196043
Burgstaller JM, Steurer J, Gravestock I, Brunner F, Fekete TF, Pichierri G, Ulrich NH, Winklhofer S, Porchet F, Farshad M, Group LS (2020) Long-term results after surgical or nonsurgical treatment in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003457
Quintana JM, Escobar A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI, Bilbao A (2005) Appropriateness of total hip joint replacement. Int J Qual Health Care 17:315–321. doi: mzi047 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi047
Quintana JM, Escobar A, Arostegui I, Bilbao A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI, Arenaza JC (2006) Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement. Arch Intern Med 166:220–226. doi: 166/2/220 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.2.220
Escobar A, Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Azkarate J, Guenaga JI, Arenaza JC, Garai I (2003) Development of explicit criteria for total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:57–70
doi: 10.1017/S0266462303000060
pubmed: 12701939
Vergara I, Bilbao A, Gonzalez N, Escobar A, Quintana JM (2011) Factors and consequences of waiting times for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1753-2
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1753-2
pubmed: 21249484
pmcid: 3069288
Riddle DL, Perera RA, Jiranek WA, Dumenci L (2014) Using surgical appropriateness criteria to examine outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in a United States sample. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22428
doi: 10.1002/acr.22428
Riddle DL, Perera RA (2019) Appropriateness and total hip arthroplasty: determining the structure of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons System of Classification. J Rheumatol 46:1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180911
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180911
pubmed: 30824660
Goodman SM, Sculco PK (2019) How appropriate are appropriate-use criteria? J Rheumatol 46:1064–1066. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.190012
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190012
pubmed: 31474613
Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Escobar A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI (2009) Decision trees for indication of total hip replacement on patients with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48:1402–1409. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kep264
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep264
pubmed: 19726567
Danon-Hersch N, Samartzis D, Wietlisbach V, Porchet F, Vader JP (2010) Appropriateness criteria for surgery improve clinical outcomes in patients with low back pain and/or sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:672–683
Gonzalez GA, Porto G, Hines K, Franco D, Montenegro TS, Mahtabfar A, O’Leary M, Miao J, Thalheimer S, Heller JE, Sharan A, Harrop J (2023) Clinical outcomes with and without adherence to evidence-based medicine guidelines for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis fusion patients. J Clin Med 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031200
Vickers AJ, Altman DG (2001) Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 323:1123–1124
doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
pubmed: 11701584
pmcid: 1121605
Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB (1996) Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276:1253–1258
doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031
pubmed: 8849754
Black N (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 312:1215–1218
doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215
pubmed: 8634569
pmcid: 2350940
Wei FL, Zhou CP, Gao QY, Du MR, Gao HR, Zhu KL, Li T, Qian JX, Yan XD (2022) Decompression alone or decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. EClinicalMedicine 51:101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101559
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101559
pubmed: 35865739
pmcid: 9294267
Dijkerman ML, Overdevest GM, Moojen WA, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA (2018) Decompression with or without concomitant fusion in lumbar stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 27:1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5436-5
doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5436-5
pubmed: 29404693
Hellum C, Rekeland F, Smastuen MC, Solberg T, Hermansen E, Storheim K, Brox JI, Furunes H, Franssen E, Weber C, Brisby H, Grundnes O, Algaard KRH, Boker T, Banitalebi H, Indrekvam K, Austevoll IM (2023) Surgery in degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion improve outcome in subgroups? A secondary analysis from a randomized trial (NORDSTEN trial). Spine J 23:1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.386
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.386
pubmed: 37355044
Austevoll IM, Hermansen E, Fagerland MW, Storheim K, Brox JI, Solberg T, Rekeland F, Franssen E, Weber C, Brisby H, Grundnes O, Algaard KRH, Boker T, Banitalebi H, Indrekvam K, Hellum C, Investigators N-D (2021) Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 385:526–538. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2100990
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990
pubmed: 34347953