Martha's rule: applying a behaviour change framework to understand the potential of complementary roles of clinicians and patients in improving safety of patients deteriorating in hospital.

Adverse events Behaviour change Failure to rescue Motivation Patient safety Personal health records

Journal

British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005)
ISSN: 1750-8460
Titre abrégé: Br J Hosp Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101257109

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 2 2024
pubmed: 28 2 2024
entrez: 28 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Martha's rule stipulates the right of patients and their families to escalate care as a way to improve safety while in hospital. This article analyses the possible impact of the proposed policy through the lens of a behaviour change framework and explores new opportunities presented by the implementation of Martha's rule.. A descriptive analysis was undertaken of interactions between patients, family, friends and clinicians during clinical deterioration in hospital. The capability-opportunity-motivation behaviour change framework was applied to understand reasons for failure to respond to deterioration. Care of deteriorating patients requires recording of vital signs, recognition of abnormalities, reporting through escalation and response by a competent clinician. Regarding the care of patients who deteriorate in hospital, healthcare professionals have capability and motivation to provide safe, high-quality care, but often lack the physical and social opportunity to report or respond through lack of time and peer pressure. Patients and family members have motivation and might have time to support safety systems. Martha's rule or similar arrangements allow healthcare organisations to create opportunities for patients and families to report and escalate care to experts in critical care when they recognise deterioration. The capability-opportunity-motivation behaviour change framework provides insights into the causes of failure to rescue in deteriorating patients and an argument for opportunities through escalation by patients and families through Martha's rule. This might reduce the number of system failures and enable safer care.

Sections du résumé

AIMS/BACKGROUND OBJECTIVE
Martha's rule stipulates the right of patients and their families to escalate care as a way to improve safety while in hospital. This article analyses the possible impact of the proposed policy through the lens of a behaviour change framework and explores new opportunities presented by the implementation of Martha's rule..
METHODS METHODS
A descriptive analysis was undertaken of interactions between patients, family, friends and clinicians during clinical deterioration in hospital. The capability-opportunity-motivation behaviour change framework was applied to understand reasons for failure to respond to deterioration.
RESULTS RESULTS
Care of deteriorating patients requires recording of vital signs, recognition of abnormalities, reporting through escalation and response by a competent clinician. Regarding the care of patients who deteriorate in hospital, healthcare professionals have capability and motivation to provide safe, high-quality care, but often lack the physical and social opportunity to report or respond through lack of time and peer pressure. Patients and family members have motivation and might have time to support safety systems. Martha's rule or similar arrangements allow healthcare organisations to create opportunities for patients and families to report and escalate care to experts in critical care when they recognise deterioration.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The capability-opportunity-motivation behaviour change framework provides insights into the causes of failure to rescue in deteriorating patients and an argument for opportunities through escalation by patients and families through Martha's rule. This might reduce the number of system failures and enable safer care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38416522
doi: 10.12968/hmed.2023.0422
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-6

Auteurs

Christian P Subbe (CP)

School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

Siri H Steinmo (SH)

inform_us Health Informatics Critical Care, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Helen Haskell (H)

Mothers Against Medical Error, Columbia, SC, USA.

Paul Barach (P)

Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Interdisciplinary Research Institute for Health Law and Science, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH