Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Hormonal Profiles in PCOS Women: A Comparative Study between Urban and Rural Environment.

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), a multifaceted endocrine disorder, affects a significant proportion of women globally, with its etiology rooted in both genetic and environmental factors. This study delves into the environmental aspect, particularly focusing on the role of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in the context of urbanization and industrialization. This research examines the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) - Bisphenol A (BPA), Mono-ethyl Hexyl Phthalate (MEHP), and Di-ethyl Hexyl Phthalate (DEHP) - on 40 women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) across urban and rural Gujarat. Employing High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and chemiluminescence, we analyzed their blood samples for EDCs levels and hormonal parameters. Urban individuals displayed significantly higher BPA and DEHP concentrations, highlighting the environmental exposure differences. Notably, urban exposure to MEHP and DEHP correlated with a marked decrease in estradiol levels, while rural DEHP exposure was associated with an increase in estradiol but a decrease in prolactin and DHEAS levels. These findings illuminate the variable effects of EDC exposure on hormonal profiles in PCOS, influenced by geographical and environmental contexts. The study underscores the critical need for tailored environmental health policies to mitigate the diverse impacts of EDCs, advocating for a nuanced approach to PCOS management that considers environmental exposures. Our insights contribute to the understanding of PCOS's hormonal dynamics, emphasizing the significance of addressing EDC exposure in different settings.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.