Adrenal venous sampling criteria for chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay as a preferable alternative to radioimmunoassay in primary aldosteronism.

Adrenal venous sampling Chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay Plasma aldosterone concentration conversion Primary aldosteronism Radioimmunoassay

Journal

Endocrine journal
ISSN: 1348-4540
Titre abrégé: Endocr J
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9313485

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 29 2 2024
pubmed: 29 2 2024
entrez: 28 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) was routinely measured using radioimmunoassay (RIA); however, the RIA kit was discontinued in March 2021 in Japan. This study examined PAC conversion in adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and AVS criteria when measured using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). PAC of 415 adrenal venous blood samples from AVS (including segmental AVS) of 63 patients with primary aldosteronism was measured using RIA (Spac-S aldosterone kit; Fujirebio Inc.) and CLEIA (Lumipulse Presto Aldosterone; Fujirebio Inc.). PAC of 70 AVS samples was also measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, ASKA Pharma Medical Co., Ltd.). PAC conversion formulas were determined for each AVS sample assay. PAC measured using CLEIA was significantly correlated with that measured using RIA (correlation coefficient = 0.971). The PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA) = PAC (RIA) × 0.772 - 1,199 pg/mL. The PAC of 14,000 pg/mL in RIA was equivalent to 9,613 pg/mL in CLEIA. PAC measured using CLEIA was also correlated with that measured using LC-MS/MS, and the PAC conversion formula was PAC (CLEIA, pg/mL) = 0.97 × PAC (LC-MS/MS, pg/mL) + 211. The inter-assay coefficient of variability (CV) was 1.1-1.3% and intra-assay CV was 1.0-1.7%, measured using CLEIA. The PAC conversion formula for AVS samples was obtained using CLEIA and RIA, and the conversion formula was different from that for peripheral blood. PAC values measured by CLEIA showed preferable accuracy and high concordance with those measured by LC-MS/MS, even in AVS samples. The study outcomes are useful for interpreting AVS results using non-RIA measurement methods.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38417879
doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0695
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Kazuki Nakai (K)

Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.

Yuya Tsurutani (Y)

Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.

Koki Irie (K)

Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.
Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.

Kyoko Teruyama (K)

Product Planning Department, Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo 107-0052, Japan.

Sachiko Suematsu (S)

Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.

Seishi Matsui (S)

Department of Radiology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.

Kohzoh Makita (K)

Department of Radiology, Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo 179-0072, Japan.

Jun Saito (J)

Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.

Masao Omura (M)

Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.
Minato Mirai Medical Square, Kanagawa 220-0012, Japan.

Tetsuo Nishikawa (T)

Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa 222-0036, Japan.
Nishikawa Clinic, Kanagawa 222-0033, Japan.

Classifications MeSH