Independent clinic-based evaluation of dual POCTs for screening for HIV and syphilis in men who have sex with men in Italy, Malta, Peru, and the United Kingdom.
Clinic-based evaluation
HIV
Men who have Sex with Men
Point-of-Care-Tests
Public Health
Syphilis
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Feb 2024
29 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
01
08
2022
accepted:
11
01
2024
medline:
1
3
2024
pubmed:
29
2
2024
entrez:
28
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Globally, the incidence of HIV and syphilis can be reduced by the use of validated point of care tests (POCTs). As part of the WHO PRoSPeRo Network, we aimed to evaluate the performance, acceptability, and operational characteristics of two dual HIV/syphilis POCTs (Bioline HIV/Syphilis Duo (Abbott) and DPP® HIV-Syphilis assay (Chembio) for the screening of HIV and syphilis amongst men who have sex with men (MSM). A cross sectional study of 2,577 MSM in Italy, Malta, Peru, and the United Kingdom (UK) presenting to seven clinic sites, were enrolled. Finger prick blood was collected to perform POCTs and results compared with standard laboratory investigations on venepuncture blood. Acceptability and operational characteristics were assessed using questionnaires. Diagnostic meta-analysis was used to combine data from the evaluation sites. Based on laboratory tests, 23.46% (n = 598/2549) of participants were confirmed HIV positive, and 35.88% of participants (n = 901/2511) were positive on treponemal reference testing. Of all participants showing evidence of antibodies to Treponema pallidum, 50.56% (n = 455/900) were Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) test reactive. Of HIV positive individuals, 60.62% (n = 354/584) had evidence of antibodies to T. pallidum, and of these 60.45% (n = 214/354) exhibited reactive RPR tests indicating probable (co)infection. For Bioline POCT, pooled sensitivities and specificities for HIV were 98.95% and 99.89% respectively, and for syphilis were 73.79% and 99.57%. For Chembio pooled sensitivities and specificities for HIV were 98.66% and 99.55%, and for syphilis were 78.60% and 99.48%. Both tests can detect greater than 90% of probable active syphilis cases, as defined by reactive RPR and treponemal test results. These dual POCTs were preferred by 74.77% (n = 1,926) of participants, due to their convenience, and the operational characteristics made them acceptable to health care providers (HCPs). Both the Bioline and the Chembio dual POCT for syphilis and HIV had acceptable performance, acceptability and operational characteristics amongst MSM in the PRoSPeRo network. These dual POCTs could serve as a strategic, more cost effective, patient and healthcare provider (HCP) friendly alternative to conventional testing; in clinical and other field settings, especially those in resource-limited settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38418941
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09019-3
pii: 10.1186/s12879-024-09019-3
pmc: PMC10902927
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Bacterial
0
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
192Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Investigateurs
Amina Hançali
(A)
Hicham Oumzi
(H)
Simon Mwima
(S)
Peter Kyambadde
(P)
Isaac Ssewanyana
(I)
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 11;12(8):e056887
pubmed: 35953255
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 29;24(Suppl 1):194
pubmed: 38418989
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
pubmed: 22007046
Lancet. 2020 Jul 25;396(10246):239-254
pubmed: 32711800
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 02;9:851635
pubmed: 35308518
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Dec;93(S4):S81-S88
pubmed: 29223966
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):1
pubmed: 30606108
Sex Transm Infect. 2020 Aug;96(5):342-347
pubmed: 32241905
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005 Jan;16(1):45-51
pubmed: 18159528
Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Sep;97(6):429-433
pubmed: 33082235
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 29;24(Suppl 1):264
pubmed: 38419023
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 18;16:302
pubmed: 27316352
AIDS Rev. 2018 Jan-Mar;20(1):71
pubmed: 29628512
Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Apr;44(4):211-218
pubmed: 28282646
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):111
pubmed: 28143443
J Virus Erad. 2022 Feb 24;8(1):100065
pubmed: 35251684
Sex Transm Infect. 2016 May;92(3):182-5
pubmed: 26670914
Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Nov;92(7):495-498
pubmed: 27154184
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Dec;93(S4):S51-S58
pubmed: 29223963
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e044479
pubmed: 33243821
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Sep;4(9 Suppl):S21-31
pubmed: 17034069
Sex Health. 2015 Apr;12(2):155-63
pubmed: 25607751
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 06;9(11):e112190
pubmed: 25375138
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;144(11):1344-1351
pubmed: 32810868
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014 May 27;1(1):ofu015
pubmed: 25734088
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Apr;45(2):416-22
pubmed: 21412577
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Dec;93(S4):S3-S15
pubmed: 28747410
AIDS. 2013 Nov 13;27(17):2665-78
pubmed: 23842129
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1110-e1118
pubmed: 34246332