Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part I: Introduction and Treatment Decision-Making at the Time of Suspected Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.

BCR biochemical recurrence prostate cancer radiation therapy radical prostatectomy salvage salvage therapy therapy

Journal

The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 29 2 2024
pubmed: 29 2 2024
entrez: 29 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The summary presented herein covers recommendations on salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer intended to facilitate care decisions and aid clinicians in caring for patients who have experienced a recurrence following prior treatment with curative intent. This is Part I of a three-part series focusing on treatment decision-making at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Please refer to Part II for discussion of treatment delivery for non-metastatic BCR after RP and Part III for discussion of evaluation and management of recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) and focal therapy, regional recurrence, and oligometastasis. The systematic review that informs this Guideline was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to July 21, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through August 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2022). Update searches were conducted on July 26, 2023. Searches were supplemented by reviewing electronic database reference lists of relevant articles. In a collaborative effort between AUA, ASTRO, and SUO, the Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based statements to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience BCR after initial definitive local therapy for clinically localized disease. Advancing work in the area of diagnostic tools (particularly imaging), biomarkers, radiation delivery, and biological manipulation with the evolving armamentarium of therapeutic agents will undoubtedly present new opportunities for patients to experience long-term control of their cancer while minimizing toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38421253
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003892
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101097JU0000000000003892

Auteurs

Todd M Morgan (TM)

Urology, University of Michigan.

Stephen A Boorjian (SA)

Urology, Mayo Clinic.

Mark K Buyyounouski (MK)

Radiation Oncology, Stanford University.

Brian F Chapin (BF)

Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

David Y T Chen (DYT)

Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center-Temple Health.

Heather H Cheng (HH)

Radiology, Harvard University.

Roger Chou (R)

Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center.

Heather A Jacene (HA)

Radiology, Harvard University.

Sophia C Kamran (SC)

Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School.

Sennett K Kim (SK)

American Urological Association.

Erin Kirkby (E)

American Urological Association.

Amy N Luckenbaugh (AN)

Urology, Vanderbilt University.

Yaw A Nyame (YA)

Division of Hematology and Oncology Medicine, University of Washington.

Edwin M Posadas (EM)

Urologic Oncology, Cedars Sinai.

Phuoc T Tran (PT)

Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland.

Ronald C Chen (RC)

Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas.

Classifications MeSH