A Retrospective Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine Monotherapy.

FOLFIRINOX Pancreatic cancer gemcitabine nab-paclitaxel peripheral neuropathy

Journal

Anticancer research
ISSN: 1791-7530
Titre abrégé: Anticancer Res
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 8102988

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 08 11 2023
revised: 30 12 2023
accepted: 04 01 2024
medline: 1 3 2024
pubmed: 1 3 2024
entrez: 29 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX), termed GnP, which is limited, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) who show good tolerance to GEM monotherapy prior to being refractory to it. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with locally advanced or metastatic PC who received GEM followed by GnP between December 2014 and March 2019, regardless of the treatment line. A total of 14 patients who received GnP after becoming refractory to GEM were included in this study. Eight patients were included in the nab-PTX-naïve group, seven of whom were treated with GEM monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy, and one was refractory to GEM monotherapy after modified FOLFIRINOX treatment. The other six patients were included in the nab-PTX reintroduction group. In this group, all patients received GnP followed by GEM maintenance therapy to prevent adverse events, such as peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. Two patients in the nab-PTX-naïve group showed partial response and none in the reintroduction group; median progression-free survival was 7.6 and 1.4 months and median overall survival was 9.4 and 6.2 months, respectively. In the safety analysis, grade 3 anemia and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient in the nab-PTX reintroduction group, while the remaining adverse events were of grade 1 or 2. GnP is safe and effective even in patients with GEM-refractory PC, and GEM treatment followed by GnP can be an effective treatment option for patients with nab-PTX-naïve PC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIM OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX), termed GnP, which is limited, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) who show good tolerance to GEM monotherapy prior to being refractory to it.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with locally advanced or metastatic PC who received GEM followed by GnP between December 2014 and March 2019, regardless of the treatment line.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 14 patients who received GnP after becoming refractory to GEM were included in this study. Eight patients were included in the nab-PTX-naïve group, seven of whom were treated with GEM monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy, and one was refractory to GEM monotherapy after modified FOLFIRINOX treatment. The other six patients were included in the nab-PTX reintroduction group. In this group, all patients received GnP followed by GEM maintenance therapy to prevent adverse events, such as peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. Two patients in the nab-PTX-naïve group showed partial response and none in the reintroduction group; median progression-free survival was 7.6 and 1.4 months and median overall survival was 9.4 and 6.2 months, respectively. In the safety analysis, grade 3 anemia and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient in the nab-PTX reintroduction group, while the remaining adverse events were of grade 1 or 2.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
GnP is safe and effective even in patients with GEM-refractory PC, and GEM treatment followed by GnP can be an effective treatment option for patients with nab-PTX-naïve PC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38423651
pii: 44/3/1233
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16919
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1233-1239

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mariko Nishioka (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Naohiro Okano (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; naohiro-okano@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp.

Masashi Wakabayashi (M)

Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Takashi Ikeno (T)

Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

Masato Hayashi (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Tomonori Mizutani (T)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Fumio Nagashima (F)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Junji Furuse (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan.

Classifications MeSH