Health professionals' experiences of whistleblowing in maternal and newborn healthcare settings: A scoping review and thematic analysis.

Maternity care Safety and quality Scoping review Speaking up Whistleblowing

Journal

Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives
ISSN: 1878-1799
Titre abrégé: Women Birth
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101266131

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 10 12 2023
revised: 29 01 2024
accepted: 18 02 2024
medline: 1 3 2024
pubmed: 1 3 2024
entrez: 29 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Whistleblowing, which involves raising concerns about wrongdoing, carries risks yet can be crucial to ensuring the safety of health service users in maternal and newborn healthcare settings. Understanding of the experiences of health care professionals that enact whistleblowing in this context is currently limited. Notable inquiries involving maternity services such as those reported upon by Ockenden and Kirkup and the Lucy Letby case in the United Kingdom have shone an international spotlight on whistleblowing failures. To identify and synthesise available literature addressing the experiences of healthcare professionals enacting whistleblowing in maternal and newborn care settings. This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Five academic databases were systematically searched for documents published between January 2013 and October 2023 with additional searches of Google Scholar and related reference lists. Whilst 35 papers from international sources were identified, the majority originated from the United Kingdom, where recent high-profile incidents have occurred. Thematic analysis identified three main themes: 'Structural Power', 'Perfectionism' and 'Bravery, Hope and Disappointment', each with sub-themes. Whistleblowing is frequently an altruistic act in a hierarchical system. It exposes poor practices and disrupts power dynamics, especially in challenging workplace cultures. Open disclosure, however, requires psychological safety. Obstacles persist, emphasising the need for a culture of trust and transparency led by individuals who embody the desired values. Primary research on whistleblowing in maternal and newborn healthcare settings is limited. This study sheds light on power dynamics and factors that affect whistleblowing.

Sections du résumé

PROBLEM OBJECTIVE
Whistleblowing, which involves raising concerns about wrongdoing, carries risks yet can be crucial to ensuring the safety of health service users in maternal and newborn healthcare settings. Understanding of the experiences of health care professionals that enact whistleblowing in this context is currently limited.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Notable inquiries involving maternity services such as those reported upon by Ockenden and Kirkup and the Lucy Letby case in the United Kingdom have shone an international spotlight on whistleblowing failures.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To identify and synthesise available literature addressing the experiences of healthcare professionals enacting whistleblowing in maternal and newborn care settings.
METHODS METHODS
This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Five academic databases were systematically searched for documents published between January 2013 and October 2023 with additional searches of Google Scholar and related reference lists.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Whilst 35 papers from international sources were identified, the majority originated from the United Kingdom, where recent high-profile incidents have occurred. Thematic analysis identified three main themes: 'Structural Power', 'Perfectionism' and 'Bravery, Hope and Disappointment', each with sub-themes.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Whistleblowing is frequently an altruistic act in a hierarchical system. It exposes poor practices and disrupts power dynamics, especially in challenging workplace cultures. Open disclosure, however, requires psychological safety. Obstacles persist, emphasising the need for a culture of trust and transparency led by individuals who embody the desired values.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Primary research on whistleblowing in maternal and newborn healthcare settings is limited. This study sheds light on power dynamics and factors that affect whistleblowing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38423844
pii: S1871-5192(24)00041-6
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101593
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

101593

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Tanya Capper (T)

Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, QLD 4014, Australia. Electronic address: Tanya.Capper@ACU.edu.au.

Bridget Ferguson (B)

CQUniversity Australia, 554/700 Yaamba Rd, Norman Gardens, Rockhampton, North QLD 4701, Australia.

Olav Muurlink (O)

CQUniversity Australia, 160 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.

Classifications MeSH