Steps toward developing a comprehensive fatigue monitoring and mitigation solution: perspectives from a cohort of United States Naval Surface Force officers.

Navy fatigue management fatigue risk ship-class sleep

Journal

Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society
ISSN: 2632-5012
Titre abrégé: Sleep Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774029

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 30 08 2023
revised: 12 01 2024
medline: 1 3 2024
pubmed: 1 3 2024
entrez: 1 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study analyzed fatigue and its management in US Naval Surface Force warships, focusing on understanding current practices and barriers, and examining the influence of organizational and individual factors on managing chronic fatigue. Furthermore, this study explored the impact of organizational and individual factors on fatigue management. As part of a larger study, 154 naval officers (mean ± standard deviation; 31.5 ± 7.0 years; 8.8 ± 6.8 years of service; 125 male, and 29 female) completed a fatigue survey. The survey addressed (1) self-reported fatigue, (2) fatigue observed in others, (3) fatigue monitoring strategies, (4) fatigue mitigation strategies, and (5) barriers to fatigue mitigation. Logistic and ordinal regressions were performed to examine the effect of individual (i.e. sleep quality and years in military service) and organizational (i.e. ship-class) factors on fatigue outcomes. Fatigue was frequently experienced and observed by 23% and 54% of officers, respectively. Of note, officers often monitored fatigue reactively (i.e. 65% observed others nodding off and 55% observed behavioral impairments). Still, officers did not frequently implement fatigue mitigation strategies, citing few operationally feasible mitigation strategies (62.3%), being too busy (61.7%), and not having clear thresholds for action (48.7%). Fatigue management varies across organizational factors, which must be considered when further developing fatigue management strategies. Fatigue remains a critical concern aboard surface force ships and it may be better addressed through development of objective sleep and fatigue monitoring tools that could inform leadership decision-making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38425454
doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae008
pii: zpae008
pmc: PMC10904103
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

zpae008

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society.

Auteurs

Alice D LaGoy (AD)

Sleep, Tactical Efficiency, and Endurance Laboratory, Warfighter Performance Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
Military and Veterans Health Solutions, Leidos, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Andrew G Kubala (AG)

Sleep, Tactical Efficiency, and Endurance Laboratory, Warfighter Performance Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
Military and Veterans Health Solutions, Leidos, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Todd R Seech (TR)

Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Coronado, CA, USA.

Jason T Jameson (JT)

Sleep, Tactical Efficiency, and Endurance Laboratory, Warfighter Performance Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
Military and Veterans Health Solutions, Leidos, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Rachel R Markwald (RR)

Sleep, Tactical Efficiency, and Endurance Laboratory, Warfighter Performance Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA.

Dale W Russell (DW)

Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Coronado, CA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH