Oncologic surveillance intensity after endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.


Journal

Minerva urology and nephrology
ISSN: 2724-6442
Titre abrégé: Minerva Urol Nephrol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777299

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 1 3 2024
pubmed: 1 3 2024
entrez: 1 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The optimal oncologic surveillance in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) elected for conservative treatment is still a matter of debate. Patients elected for endoscopic treatment of UTUC were followed up according to EAU guidelines recommendations after treatment. Bladder cancer recurrence-free survival (BCa-RFS), UTUC recurrence-free survival (UTUC-RFS), radical nephroureterectomy-free survival (RNU-FS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The crude risks of BCa and UTUC recurrences over time were estimated with the Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing method. Overall, 54 and 55 patients had low- and high-risk diseases, respectively. Median follow-up was 46.9 (IQR: 28.7-68.7) and 36.9 (IQR: 19.8-60.1) months in low and high-risk patients, respectively. In low-risk patients, BCa recurrence risk was more than 20% at 24 months follow-up. At 60 months, time point after which cystoscopy and imaging should be interrupted, the risk of BCa recurrence and UTUC recurrence were 14% and 7%, respectively. In high-risk patients, the risk of BCa and UTUC recurrence at 36 months was approximately 40% and 10%, respectively. Conversely, at 60 months, the risk of bladder recurrence and UTUC recurrence was 28% and 8%, respectively. For low-risk patients, cystoscopy should be performed semi-annually until 24 months, while upper tract assessment should be obtained up to 60 months, as per current EAU guidelines recommendations. For high-risk patients, upper tract assessment should be intensified to semi-annually up to 36 months, then obtained yearly. Conversely, cystoscopy should be ideally performed semi-annually until 60 months and yearly thereafter.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The optimal oncologic surveillance in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) elected for conservative treatment is still a matter of debate.
METHODS METHODS
Patients elected for endoscopic treatment of UTUC were followed up according to EAU guidelines recommendations after treatment. Bladder cancer recurrence-free survival (BCa-RFS), UTUC recurrence-free survival (UTUC-RFS), radical nephroureterectomy-free survival (RNU-FS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The crude risks of BCa and UTUC recurrences over time were estimated with the Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing method.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 54 and 55 patients had low- and high-risk diseases, respectively. Median follow-up was 46.9 (IQR: 28.7-68.7) and 36.9 (IQR: 19.8-60.1) months in low and high-risk patients, respectively. In low-risk patients, BCa recurrence risk was more than 20% at 24 months follow-up. At 60 months, time point after which cystoscopy and imaging should be interrupted, the risk of BCa recurrence and UTUC recurrence were 14% and 7%, respectively. In high-risk patients, the risk of BCa and UTUC recurrence at 36 months was approximately 40% and 10%, respectively. Conversely, at 60 months, the risk of bladder recurrence and UTUC recurrence was 28% and 8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
For low-risk patients, cystoscopy should be performed semi-annually until 24 months, while upper tract assessment should be obtained up to 60 months, as per current EAU guidelines recommendations. For high-risk patients, upper tract assessment should be intensified to semi-annually up to 36 months, then obtained yearly. Conversely, cystoscopy should be ideally performed semi-annually until 60 months and yearly thereafter.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38426423
pii: S2724-6051.23.05593-3
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05593-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

88-96

Auteurs

Giuseppe Basile (G)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain - basile.giuseppe@hsr.it.
Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy - basile.giuseppe@hsr.it.

Andrea Gallioli (A)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Alberto Martini (A)

Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Paolo Verri (P)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Jorge Robalino (J)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Lucia Dieguez (L)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Pavel Gavrilov (P)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Angelo Territo (A)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Alessandro Uleri (A)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Urology, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Josep M Gaya (JM)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Ferran Algaba (F)

Department of Pathology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Joan Palou (J)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Alberto Breda (A)

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Classifications MeSH