Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Histopathological Scoring System for Capsular Contracture Based on 720 Breast Implant Capsules.


Journal

Aesthetic surgery journal
ISSN: 1527-330X
Titre abrégé: Aesthet Surg J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9707469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 05 01 2024
revised: 16 02 2024
accepted: 26 02 2024
medline: 2 3 2024
pubmed: 2 3 2024
entrez: 1 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Capsular contracture is traditionally evaluated using the Baker classification. However, this classification has notable limitations in reproducibility and objectivity. To develop and validate procedure-specific histopathological scoring systems to assess capsular contracture severity. Biopsies of breast implant capsules were used to develop histopathological scoring systems for patients following breast augmentation and breast reconstruction. Ten histological parameters were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression to identify those most associated with capsular contracture. Significant parameters (p < 0.05) were selected for the scoring systems and assigned weighted scores (1-10). Validation was performed using area under the curve (AUC) and mean absolute error (MAE). A total of 720 biopsies from 542 patients were included. Four parameters were selected for the augmentation scoring system including collagen layer thickness, fiber organization, inflammatory infiltration, and calcification, providing a combined maximum score of 26. The AUC and MAE for the augmentation scoring system was 81% and 0.8% which is considered strong. Three parameters were selected for the reconstruction scoring system including fiber organization, collagen layer cellularity, and inflammatory infiltration, providing a combined maximum score of 19. The AUC and MAE of the reconstruction scoring system was 72% and 7.1% which is considered good. The new histopathological scoring systems provide an objective, reproducible, and accurate assessment of capsular contracture severity. We propose these novel scoring systems as a valuable tool for confirming the capsular contracture diagnosis in the clinical setting, for research, and for implant manufacturers and insurance providers in need of a confirmed capsular contracture diagnosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Capsular contracture is traditionally evaluated using the Baker classification. However, this classification has notable limitations in reproducibility and objectivity.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To develop and validate procedure-specific histopathological scoring systems to assess capsular contracture severity.
METHODS METHODS
Biopsies of breast implant capsules were used to develop histopathological scoring systems for patients following breast augmentation and breast reconstruction. Ten histological parameters were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression to identify those most associated with capsular contracture. Significant parameters (p < 0.05) were selected for the scoring systems and assigned weighted scores (1-10). Validation was performed using area under the curve (AUC) and mean absolute error (MAE).
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 720 biopsies from 542 patients were included. Four parameters were selected for the augmentation scoring system including collagen layer thickness, fiber organization, inflammatory infiltration, and calcification, providing a combined maximum score of 26. The AUC and MAE for the augmentation scoring system was 81% and 0.8% which is considered strong. Three parameters were selected for the reconstruction scoring system including fiber organization, collagen layer cellularity, and inflammatory infiltration, providing a combined maximum score of 19. The AUC and MAE of the reconstruction scoring system was 72% and 7.1% which is considered good.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The new histopathological scoring systems provide an objective, reproducible, and accurate assessment of capsular contracture severity. We propose these novel scoring systems as a valuable tool for confirming the capsular contracture diagnosis in the clinical setting, for research, and for implant manufacturers and insurance providers in need of a confirmed capsular contracture diagnosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38429010
pii: 7617592
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae050
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Andreas Larsen (A)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Adam Mandrup Timmermann (AM)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Mikela Kring (M)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sif Birch Mathisen (SB)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Erik Eiler Frydshou Bak (EEF)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Tim Kongsmark Weltz (TK)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Mathias Ørholt (M)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Peter Vester-Glowinski (P)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jens Jørgen Elberg (JJ)

Plastic surgeons in private practice in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jesper Trillingsgaard (J)

Plastic surgeons in private practice in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Louise Vennegaard Mielke (LV)

Plastic surgeons in private practice in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich (LR)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Tine Engberg Damsgaard (TE)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Odense and University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.

Anne Roslind (A)

Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Mikkel Herly (M)

Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH