Geriatric screening and comprehensive geriatric assessment during initial oncology appointments.

Advance Care Planning Cancer Clinical assessment Hospital care

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 06 02 2024
accepted: 09 02 2024
medline: 2 3 2024
pubmed: 2 3 2024
entrez: 1 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Geriatric oncology underscores the significance of assessing functional age in guiding medical decisions, endeavouring to delineate practical and efficacious methodologies for evaluating functionality, adapting therapeutic regimens and attenuating the risks of treatment-related deterioration. In this prospective study, we aimed to delineate the characteristics of older patients presenting for their initial oncology appointment by using geriatric screening (G8 score) and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), while also assessing the feasibility of these evaluations. Secondary objectives included comparing the initial Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and any deviations from standard therapeutic strategies against the identified frailty in geriatric assessment. Most patients exhibited a G8 score ≤14 and underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment. While oncologists typically perceive patients' general conditions, CGA enables a systematic assessment, providing a comprehensive characterisation of elderly patients to inform therapeutic decisions and address identified fragilities. The CGA highlighted vulnerabilities across all primary domains. Notably, even among patients with ECOG scores of 0 and 1, the application of G8 score and CGA revealed numerous fragilities. Consistent with existing literature, these scales offered additional insights beyond ECOG evaluation alone, suggesting their potential to guide therapeutic adaptations for this demographic. Ongoing research and continuous evaluation are imperative to refine and broaden the implementation of geriatric-focused interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38429115
pii: spcare-2024-004822
doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004822
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Tânia Madureira (T)

Medical Oncology, Local Health Unit of Algarve, Faro, Portugal taniasofiamm@hotmail.com.

Joana Magalhães (J)

Medical Oncology, Local Health Unit of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

Pedro Vilas (P)

Internal Medicine, Local Health Unit of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

Elsa Campôa (E)

Medical Oncology, Local Health Unit of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

Paulo Luz (P)

Medical Oncology, Local Health Unit of Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

Filipe Coutinho (F)

Medical Oncology, Local Health Unit of Médio Ave, Santo Tirso/Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
Geriatric Oncology Working Group of the Portuguese Society of Oncology, Coimbra, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH