Efficacy and safety of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of athletes with glenoid bone defects ≥ 20%: a single-arm meta-analysis.
Athletes
Glenoid bone defect
Latarjet
meta-analysis
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
27
12
2023
accepted:
22
02
2024
medline:
2
3
2024
pubmed:
2
3
2024
entrez:
1
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The shoulder joint is the most commonly dislocated joint in the human body, and the recurrence rate exceeds 50% after nonsurgical treatment. Although surgical treatment reduces the recurrence rate, there is controversy regarding the optimal surgical approach. Previous studies suggest that the Latarjet procedure yields favourable outcomes for specific populations at risk of recurrence, such as competitive athletes with significant glenoid defects. However, most of the existing related research consists of nonrandomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, and there is a lack of strong evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the Latarjet procedure. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. Athletes with ≥ 20% glenoid defects were selected for inclusion. The following data were extracted: general patient information, instability rates, return to sports (RTS) rates, imaging features (graft positioning rate and graft healing rate), functional assessments [Rowe score, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System(ASOSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), forward flexion function, and external rotation function], and complications. After excluding suspected duplicate cases, a total of 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The studies involved a total of 255 patients, including 237 males (93%) and 18 females (7%). The average age at the time of surgery was 25.4 ± 8.5 years. All the studies had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, with an average follow-up time of 48.7 ± 18.9 months. The pooled rate of return to sport (RTS) was 94.3% (95% CI: 87.3%, 98.8%), and 86.1% (95% CI: 78.2%, 92.5%) of patients returned to their preoperative level of activity. The pooled redislocation rate was 1.1% (95% CI: 0%, 3.8%). Regarding the imaging results, the combined graft retention rate was 92.1% (95% CI: 88.1%, 95.5%), and the graft healing rate was 92.1% (95% CI: 88%, 95.4%). Postoperative functional evaluation revealed that the combined Rowe score, ASOSS score, and VAS score were 93.7 ± 6.5 points, 88.5 ± 4.4 points, and 1.1 ± 10 points, respectively. The forward flexion and external rotation angles were 170.9 ± 6.9 degrees and 65.6 ± 4.5 degrees, respectively. After excluding one study with unclear complications, the combined complication rate was 9.4% (95% CI: 1.0%, 23.6%). For athletes with shoulder instability and a total of ≥ 20% glenoid bone defects, the Latarjet procedure can achieve excellent functional outcomes, with the majority of patients returning to preoperative levels of sports activity. This procedure also leads to a low recurrence rate. Therefore, the Latarjet procedure has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The shoulder joint is the most commonly dislocated joint in the human body, and the recurrence rate exceeds 50% after nonsurgical treatment. Although surgical treatment reduces the recurrence rate, there is controversy regarding the optimal surgical approach. Previous studies suggest that the Latarjet procedure yields favourable outcomes for specific populations at risk of recurrence, such as competitive athletes with significant glenoid defects. However, most of the existing related research consists of nonrandomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, and there is a lack of strong evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the Latarjet procedure.
METHODS
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. Athletes with ≥ 20% glenoid defects were selected for inclusion. The following data were extracted: general patient information, instability rates, return to sports (RTS) rates, imaging features (graft positioning rate and graft healing rate), functional assessments [Rowe score, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System(ASOSS), visual analogue scale (VAS), forward flexion function, and external rotation function], and complications.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After excluding suspected duplicate cases, a total of 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The studies involved a total of 255 patients, including 237 males (93%) and 18 females (7%). The average age at the time of surgery was 25.4 ± 8.5 years. All the studies had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, with an average follow-up time of 48.7 ± 18.9 months. The pooled rate of return to sport (RTS) was 94.3% (95% CI: 87.3%, 98.8%), and 86.1% (95% CI: 78.2%, 92.5%) of patients returned to their preoperative level of activity. The pooled redislocation rate was 1.1% (95% CI: 0%, 3.8%). Regarding the imaging results, the combined graft retention rate was 92.1% (95% CI: 88.1%, 95.5%), and the graft healing rate was 92.1% (95% CI: 88%, 95.4%). Postoperative functional evaluation revealed that the combined Rowe score, ASOSS score, and VAS score were 93.7 ± 6.5 points, 88.5 ± 4.4 points, and 1.1 ± 10 points, respectively. The forward flexion and external rotation angles were 170.9 ± 6.9 degrees and 65.6 ± 4.5 degrees, respectively. After excluding one study with unclear complications, the combined complication rate was 9.4% (95% CI: 1.0%, 23.6%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
For athletes with shoulder instability and a total of ≥ 20% glenoid bone defects, the Latarjet procedure can achieve excellent functional outcomes, with the majority of patients returning to preoperative levels of sports activity. This procedure also leads to a low recurrence rate. Therefore, the Latarjet procedure has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38429849
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04641-y
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-04641-y
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
159Subventions
Organisme : Grants from Yunnan Orthopedics and Sports Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine Research Center
ID : 202102AA310068
Organisme : Grants from Yunnan Orthopedics and Sports Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine Research Center
ID : 202102AA310068
Organisme : Grants from Yunnan Orthopedics and Sports Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine Research Center
ID : 202102AA310068
Organisme : Grants from Yunnan Orthopedics and Sports Rehabilitation Clinical Medicine Research Center
ID : 202102AA310068
Organisme : Foundation item: The key project of construction of clinical center of Yunnan Provincial Health Commission
ID : ZX20191001
Organisme : Foundation item: The key project of construction of clinical center of Yunnan Provincial Health Commission
ID : ZX20191001
Organisme : Foundation item: The key project of construction of clinical center of Yunnan Provincial Health Commission
ID : ZX20191001
Organisme : Foundation item: The key project of construction of clinical center of Yunnan Provincial Health Commission
ID : ZX20191001
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Zacchilli MA, Owens BD. Epidemiology of shoulder dislocations presenting to emergency departments in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:542–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00450 .
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00450
pubmed: 20194311
Hovelius L, Olofsson A, Sandstrom B, Augustini BG, Krantz L, Fredin H, Tillander B, Skoglund U, Salomonsson B, Nowak J, et al. Nonoperative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation in patients forty years of age and younger. A prospective twenty-five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:945–52. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00070 .
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00070
pubmed: 18451384
Verweij L, Pruijssen EC, Kerkhoffs G, Blankevoort L, Sierevelt IN, van Deurzen D, van den Bekerom M. Treatment type may influence degree of post-dislocation shoulder osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:2312–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06263-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06263-3
pubmed: 32936334
Garcia GH, Taylor SA, Fabricant PD, Dines JS. Shoulder instability management: a Survey of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45:E91–7.
pubmed: 26991589
Abdul-Rassoul H, Galvin JW, Curry EJ, Simon J, Li X. Return to Sport after Surgical Treatment for Anterior Shoulder instability: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:1507–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518780934 .
doi: 10.1177/0363546518780934
pubmed: 29949383
Pathak S, Haidermota MJ, Sancheti HV. Arthroscopic bankart and remplissage for Anteroinferior Instability with Subcritical Bone loss has a low recurrence rate. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4:e695–e703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.12.014
pubmed: 35494301
pmcid: 9042916
Nakagawa S, Mae T, Sato S, Okimura S, Kuroda M. Risk factors for the postoperative recurrence of instability after arthroscopic bankart repair in athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:1808773918. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117726494 .
doi: 10.1177/2325967117726494
Kukkonen J, Elamo S, Flinkkila T, Paloneva J, Mantysaari M, Joukainen A, Lehtinen J, Lepola V, Holstila M, Kauko T, et al. Arthroscopic bankart versus open latarjet as a primary operative treatment for traumatic anteroinferior instability in young males: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56:327–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104028 .
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104028
pubmed: 34551902
Verweij L, van Spanning SH, Grillo A, Kerkhoffs G, Priester-Vink S, van Deurzen D, van den Bekerom M. Age, participation in competitive sports, bony lesions, ALPSA lesions, > 1 preoperative dislocations, surgical delay and ISIS score > 3 are risk factors for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4584 shoulders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:4004–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06704-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06704-7
pubmed: 34420117
pmcid: 8595227
Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1470–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.18962 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.18962
pubmed: 17998184
LATARJET M. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Lyon Chir. 1954;49:994–7.
pubmed: 13234709
Provencher MT, Bhatia S, Ghodadra NS, Grumet RC, Bach BJ, Dewing CB, LeClere L, Romeo AA. Recurrent shoulder instability: current concepts for evaluation and management of glenoid bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(Suppl 2):133–51. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00906 .
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00906
pubmed: 21123597
Hendy BA, Padegimas EM, Kane L, Harper T, Abboud JA, Lazarus MD, Romeo AA, Namdari S. Early postoperative complications after Latarjet procedure: a single-institution experience over 10 years. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2021;30:e300–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.002
Longo UG, Loppini M, Rizzello G, Ciuffreda M, Maffulli N, Denaro V, Latarjet. Bristow, and Eden-Hybinette procedures for anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:1184–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.005
pubmed: 24907025
Williams H, Evans JP, Furness ND, Smith CD. It’s not all about redislocation: a systematic review of complications after anterior shoulder stabilization surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:3277–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518810711 .
doi: 10.1177/0363546518810711
pubmed: 30525905
Rossi LA, Tanoira I, Brandariz R, Pasqualini I, Ranalletta M. Reasons why athletes do not return to sports after arthroscopic Bankart repair: a comparative study of 208 athletes with Minimum 2-Year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:941618450. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211013394 .
doi: 10.1177/23259671211013394
Rossi LA, Tanoira I, Bruchmann MG, Pasqualini I, Ranalletta M. The Latarjet procedure in competitive athletes younger than 20 years old with a significant glenoid bone loss. Shoulder Elb. 2022;14:21–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573220944166 .
doi: 10.1177/1758573220944166
Brandariz RN, Gorodischer TD, Pasqualini I, Rossi LA, Tanoira I, Ranalletta M. The Latarjet Procedure without Remplissage is effective to Restore Stability in athletes with glenoid bone defects Greater Than 25% and off-Track Hill-Sachs lesions. Arthroscopy. 2021;37:2455–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.048 .
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.048
pubmed: 33812026
Ranalletta M, Rossi LA, Bertona A, Tanoira I, Maignon GD, Bongiovanni SL. Modified Latarjet Procedure without Capsulolabral Repair for the treatment of failed previous operative stabilizations in athletes. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:1421–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.006
pubmed: 29402585
Rossi LA, Bertona A, Tanoira I, Maignon GD, Bongiovanni SL, Ranalletta M. Comparison between modified Latarjet Performed as a primary or Revision Procedure in competitive athletes: a comparative study of 100 patients with a Minimum 2-Year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6:1809864657. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118817233 .
doi: 10.1177/2325967118817233
Rossi LA, Tanoira I, Gorodischer T, Pasqualini I, Ranalletta M. Similar results in return to sports, recurrences, and Healing Rates between the Classic and Congruent-Arc Latarjet for athletes with recurrent glenohumeral instability and a failed stabilization. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:2367–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.013 .
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.013
pubmed: 32442711
Yao H, Chen X, Tan X. Efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a single-arm meta-analysis among Chinese patients. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08154-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08154-3
pubmed: 33892656
pmcid: 8063308
Asker M, Brooke HL, Walden M, Tranaeus U, Johansson F, Skillgate E, Holm LW. Risk factors for, and prevention of, shoulder injuries in overhead sports: a systematic review with best-evidence synthesis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1312–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098254 .
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098254
pubmed: 29581141
Alkaduhimi H, van der Linde JA, Willigenburg NW, Paulino PN, van Deurzen DF, van den Bekerom MP. Redislocation risk after an arthroscopic Bankart procedure in collision athletes: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25:1549–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.002
Cho NS, Hwang JC, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic stabilization in anterior shoulder instability: collision athletes versus noncollision athletes. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:947–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.015
pubmed: 16952723
An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, Trantalis J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25:853–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.001
Jeon YS, Jeong HY, Lee DK, Rhee YG. Borderline Glenoid Bone defect in anterior shoulder instability: Latarjet Procedure Versus Bankart Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:2170–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518776978 .
doi: 10.1177/0363546518776978
pubmed: 29879363
Domos P, Lunini E, Walch G. Contraindications and complications of the Latarjet procedure. Shoulder Elb. 2018;10:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217728716 .
doi: 10.1177/1758573217728716
Lima E, Oses GL, de Godoy GP, Lara P, Ribeiro LM, de Figueiredo EA, Pochini AC, Andreoli CV, Belangero PS, Ejnisman B. Evaluation of Latarjet procedure in female athletes: a 3-year follow-up prospective cohort study. JSES Int. 2022;6:343–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.007
pubmed: 35572422
pmcid: 9091741
van Iersel TP, van Spanning SH, Verweij L, Priester-Vink S, van Deurzen D, van den Bekerom M. Why do patients with anterior shoulder instability not return to sport after surgery? A systematic review of 63 studies comprising 3545 patients. JSES Int. 2023;7:376–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.001
pubmed: 37266170
pmcid: 10229421
Hurley ET, Jamal MS, Ali ZS, Montgomery C, Pauzenberger L, Mullett H. Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2019;28:e33–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.028 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.028
Davis WH, DiPasquale JA, Patel RK, Sandler AB, Scanaliato JP, Dunn JC, Parnes N. Arthroscopic remplissage combined with Bankart Repair results in a higher rate of return to Sport in athletes compared with Bankart Repair alone or the Latarjet Procedure: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51:3304–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221138559 .
doi: 10.1177/03635465221138559
pubmed: 36622005
Horinek JL, Menendez ME, Narbona P, Ladermann A, Barth J, Denard PJ. Arthroscopic Bankart Repair with Remplissage as an alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability with more than 15% glenoid bone loss. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10:951747313. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221142257 .
doi: 10.1177/23259671221142257
Horinek JL, Menendez ME, Narbona P, Ladermann A, Barth J, Denard PJ. Remplissage yields similar 2-Year outcomes, fewer complications, and low recurrence compared to Latarjet across a wide range of Preoperative Glenoid Bone loss. Arthroscopy. 2022;38:2798–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.031 .
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.031
pubmed: 35405284
Rossi LA, Tanoira I, Gorodischer T, Pasqualini I, Ranalletta M. Recurrence and revision rates with arthroscopic Bankart Repair compared with the Latarjet Procedure in Competitive Rugby players with Glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss < 20. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49:866–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520988154 .
doi: 10.1177/0363546520988154
pubmed: 33606555
Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, Berge LL, An KN. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:35–46. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200001000-00005 .
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200001000-00005
pubmed: 10653082
Nacca C, Gil JA, Badida R, Crisco JJ, Owens BD. Crit Glenoid Bone Loss Posterior Shoulder Instability. 2018;46:1058–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518758015 .
doi: 10.1177/0363546518758015
Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Melis B, Walch G. Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for anterior instability of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:1691–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.015
Marjanovic B, Poberaj B, Kolar M, Nabergoj M, Kopac C, Gosnik B, Merkac J, Mirnik N. 11% complications rate after Latarjet procedure at up to 14 years follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg. 2022;106:227–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-021-00697-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00697-9
pubmed: 33469890
Garcia JJ, Do AF, Belchior RJ, de Carvalho LQ, Markarian GG, Montero E. Comparative systematic review of fixation methods of the Coracoid and Conjoined Tendon in the Anterior Glenoid to treat anterior shoulder instability. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7:1809867963. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118820539 .
doi: 10.1177/2325967118820539
Malahias MA, Fandridis E, Chytas D, Chronopulos E, Brilakis E, Antonogiannakis E. Arthroscopic versus open latarjet: a step-by-step comprehensive and systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29:957–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02398-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02398-3
pubmed: 30847680