Intravenous Hemin, a potential heme oxygenase-1 activator, does not protect from post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in humans: Results of a randomized multicentric multinational placebo-controlled trial.

Cytoprotective effect ERCP Heme oxygenase Hemin Post-ERCP pancreatitis

Journal

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1424-3911
Titre abrégé: Pancreatology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100966936

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 18 08 2023
revised: 06 02 2024
accepted: 14 02 2024
medline: 3 3 2024
pubmed: 3 3 2024
entrez: 2 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Hemin, a heme oxygenase 1 activator has shown efficacy in the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis in mouse models. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the protective effect of Hemin administration to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in patients at risk. In this multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind RCT, we assigned patients at risk for PEP to receive a single intravenous dose of Hemin (4 mg/kg) or placebo immediately after ERCP. Patients were considered to be at risk on the basis of validated patient- and/or procedure-related risk factors. Neither rectal NSAIDs nor pancreatic stent insertion were allowed in randomized patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included lipase elevation, mortality, safety, and length of stay. A total of 282 of the 294 randomized patients had complete follow-up. Groups were similar in terms of clinical, laboratory, and technical risk factors for PEP. PEP occurred in 16 of 142 patients (11.3%) in the Hemin group and in 20 of 140 patients (14.3%) in the placebo group (p = 0.48). Incidence of severe PEP reached 0.7% and 4.3% in the Hemin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Significant lipase elevation after ERCP did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay, mortality and severe adverse events rates were similar between groups. We failed to detect large improvements in PEP rate among participants at risk for PEP who received IV hemin immediately after the procedure compared to placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01855841).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38431445
pii: S1424-3903(24)00036-X
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.02.009
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01855841']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Rawad A Yared (RA)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: rawadyared@hotmail.com.

Chieh-Chang Chen (CC)

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan.

Astrid Vandorpe (A)

Pharmacy, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Brussels, Belgium.

Marianna Arvanitakis (M)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Myriam Delhaye (M)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Michael Fernandez Y Viesca (MFY)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Vincent Huberty (V)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Daniel Blero (D)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.

Emmanuel Toussaint (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; CHU Brugmann, Department of Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Axel Hittelet (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium.

Didier Verset (D)

Department of Gastroenterology, CH Jolimont, La Louvière, Belgium.

Walter Margos (W)

Department of Gastroenterology, CH Jolimont, La Louvière, Belgium.

Olivier Le Moine (O)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Hassane Njimi (H)

Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Brussels, Belgium.

Wei-Chih Liao (WC)

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan.

Jacques Devière (J)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Arnaud Lemmers (A)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH