Exploring the impact of information and communication technologies on loneliness and social isolation in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of reviews.

Information and communication technologies Knowledge synthesis Loneliness Older adults Scoping review of reviews Social isolation

Journal

BMC geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr

Pays: England

ID NLM: 100968548

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Mar 2024

Historique:

received: 01 09 2023

accepted: 21 02 2024

medline: 3 3 2024

pubmed: 3 3 2024

entrez: 2 3 2024

Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recognizing the escalating public health concerns of loneliness and social isolation in aging populations, this study seeks to comprehensively explore the potential of information and communication technology (ICT)-based interventions to address these issues among older adults. This scoping review of reviews aims to map and synthesize existing evidence on the effectiveness and scope of ICT interventions targeting loneliness and social isolation in community-dwelling older adults, elucidating types of technology, impacts, facilitators, barriers, and research gaps. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, we systematically searched eight diverse databases identifying relevant published reviews. We included English-written, peer-reviewed reviews of all types, with no limits regarding time of publication about ICTs targeting loneliness and/or social isolation for community-dwelling older adults. Eligible reviews were analysed and summarized, offering a holistic narrative of the reported types of ICTs and their impact, the identified facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation and adoption of ICT interventions, and the research gaps identified in the literature. The review included 39 publications published between 2012 and 2024, spanning systematic, scoping, and reviews of reviews. Various ICTs were reported, primarily social media virtual communities, followed by video-mediated friendly visits, conversational agents, social robots, exergames and online gameplay. Predominantly positive impacts on mitigating social isolation and loneliness were evident for these ICTs, although methodological diversity and contradictory findings complicated definite conclusions. Facilitators and barriers encompassed individual competencies, access and usage, and intervention design and implementation. Research gaps involved targeting specific subgroups, exploring innovative technologies, incorporating diverse study designs, improving research methodologies, and addressing usability and accessibility. Future research should focus on identifying elderly individuals who can benefit the most from ICT use, exploring novel technologies, using a wider range of study designs, and enhancing usability and accessibility considerations. This review sheds light on the diverse range of ICTs, their impact, and the facilitators and barriers associated with their use. Future investigations should prioritize refining outcome measures, addressing gender differences, and enhancing the usability and accessibility of interventions. The involvement of older adults in the design process and the exploration of technological training interventions hold promise in overcoming barriers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND

METHODS METHODS

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, we systematically searched eight diverse databases identifying relevant published reviews. We included English-written, peer-reviewed reviews of all types, with no limits regarding time of publication about ICTs targeting loneliness and/or social isolation for community-dwelling older adults. Eligible reviews were analysed and summarized, offering a holistic narrative of the reported types of ICTs and their impact, the identified facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation and adoption of ICT interventions, and the research gaps identified in the literature.

RESULTS RESULTS

The review included 39 publications published between 2012 and 2024, spanning systematic, scoping, and reviews of reviews. Various ICTs were reported, primarily social media virtual communities, followed by video-mediated friendly visits, conversational agents, social robots, exergames and online gameplay. Predominantly positive impacts on mitigating social isolation and loneliness were evident for these ICTs, although methodological diversity and contradictory findings complicated definite conclusions. Facilitators and barriers encompassed individual competencies, access and usage, and intervention design and implementation. Research gaps involved targeting specific subgroups, exploring innovative technologies, incorporating diverse study designs, improving research methodologies, and addressing usability and accessibility. Future research should focus on identifying elderly individuals who can benefit the most from ICT use, exploring novel technologies, using a wider range of study designs, and enhancing usability and accessibility considerations.

CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS

This review sheds light on the diverse range of ICTs, their impact, and the facilitators and barriers associated with their use. Future investigations should prioritize refining outcome measures, addressing gender differences, and enhancing the usability and accessibility of interventions. The involvement of older adults in the design process and the exploration of technological training interventions hold promise in overcoming barriers.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04837-1 PMID: 38431561

pubmed: 38431561

doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04837-1

pii: 10.1186/s12877-024-04837-1

doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Pagination

215

Informations de copyright

Références

Social isolation and loneliness among older people: advocacy brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC_SA 3.0 IGO.

Evans IEM, Martyr A, Collins R, Brayne C, Clare L. Social isolation and cognitive function in later life: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Anstey K, Peters R, editors. JAD. 2019;70(s1):S119–44.

Kuiper JS, Zuidersma M, Oude Voshaar RC, Zuidema SU, van den Heuvel ER, Stolk RP, et al. Social relationships and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;22:39–57.

pubmed: 25956016 doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.006

Lara E, Martín-María N, De la Torre-Luque A, Koyanagi A, Vancampfort D, Izquierdo A, et al. Does loneliness contribute to mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2019 Jul;52:7–16.

pubmed: 30914351 doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.03.002

Leigh-Hunt N, Bagguley D, Bash K, Turner V, Turnbull S, Valtorta N, et al. An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness. Public Health. 2017;152:157–71.

pubmed: 28915435 doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.035

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care system. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2020. [cited 2023 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25663

Newman K, Wang AH, Wang AZY, Hanna D. The role of internet-based digital tools in reducing social isolation and addressing support needs among informal caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1495.

pubmed: 31706294 pmcid: 6842183 doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7837-3

Mihalopoulos C, Le LKD, Chatterton ML, Bucholc J, Holt-Lunstad J, Lim MH, et al. The economic costs of loneliness: a review of cost-of-illness and economic evaluation studies. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55(7):823–36.

pubmed: 31119308 doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01733-7

Fakoya OA, McCorry NK, Donnelly M. Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):129.

pubmed: 32054474 pmcid: 7020371 doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6

Perissinotto C, Holt-Lunstad J, Periyakoil VS, Covinsky K. A practical approach to assessing and mitigating loneliness and isolation in older adults. J American Geriatrics Soc. 2019;67(4):657–62.

doi: 10.1111/jgs.15746

Cacioppo S, Grippo AJ, London S, Goossens L, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness: clinical import and interventions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):238–49.

pubmed: 25866548 pmcid: 4391342 doi: 10.1177/1745691615570616

Dykstra PA. Older adult loneliness: myths and realities. Eur J Ageing. 2009;6(2):91–100.

pubmed: 19517025 pmcid: 2693783 doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0110-3

Yang K, Victor C. Age and loneliness in 25 European nations. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(8):1368–88.

doi: 10.1017/S0144686X1000139X

Ong AD, Uchino BN, Wethington E. Loneliness and health in older adults: a Mini-review and synthesis. Gerontol. 2016;62(4):443–9.

doi: 10.1159/000441651

Gao Q, Prina AM, Prince M, Acosta D, Luisa Sosa A, Guerra M, et al. Loneliness among older adults in Latin America, China, and India: prevalence, correlates and association with mortality. Int J Public Health. 2021;31(66):604449.

doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.604449

Hossain MM, Purohit N, Khan N, McKyer ELJ, Ma P, Bhattacharya S, et al. Prevalence and correlates of loneliness in India: a systematic review. SocArXiv Papers; 2020. [cited 2023 Mar 31]. Available from: https://osf.io/x4ctz .

Yang K, Victor CR. The prevalence of and risk factors for loneliness among older people in China. Ageing Soc. 2008;28(3):305–27.

doi: 10.1017/S0144686X07006848

Cudjoe TKM, Roth DL, Szanton SL, Wolff JL, Boyd CM, Thorpe RJ. The epidemiology of social isolation: National Health and aging trends study. Carr D, editor. J Gerontol: Series B. 2020;75(1):107–13.

doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby037

Nicholson NR. A review of social isolation: an important but Underassessed condition in older adults. J Primary Prevent. 2012;33(2–3):137–52.

doi: 10.1007/s10935-012-0271-2

Kotian DB, Mathews M, Parsekar SS, Nair S, Binu VS, Subba SH. Factors associated with social isolation among the older people in India. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2018;31(5):271–8.

pubmed: 30149767 doi: 10.1177/0891988718796338

Beard JR, Officer A, De Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2145–54.

pubmed: 26520231 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4

Jopling K. Promising approaches revisited: effective action on loneliness in later life [internet]. London: Campaign to End Loneliness; 2020. Available from: https://www.campaigntoendloneliness.org/wp-content/uploads/Promising_ Approaches_Revisited_FULL_REPORT.pdf

Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219–66.

doi: 10.1177/1088868310377394

United Nations. Policy brief: The impact of COVID-19 on older persons. New York City; 2020. [cited 2023 Aug 20]. Available from: https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/Policy-Brief-The-Impact-of-COVID-19-on-Older-Persons.pdf .

Dahlberg L. Loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aging Ment Health. 2021;25(7):1161–4.

pubmed: 33491474 doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1875195

Holt-Lunstad J. A pandemic of social isolation? World Psychiatry. 2021;20(1):55–6.

pubmed: 33432754 pmcid: 7801834 doi: 10.1002/wps.20839

Christensson P. ICT Definition. 2010. [cited 2023 Dec 6]. Available from: https://techterms.com/definition/ict .

Boulton E, Kneale D, Stansfield C, Heron P, Sutcliffe K, Hayanga B, et al. Rapid systematic review of systematic reviews: what befriending, social support and low intensity psychosocial interventions, delivered remotely, may reduce social isolation and loneliness among older adults and how? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved with reservations] F1000Research. 2021;9:1368. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27076.2 .

Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs institute reviewers’ manual 2015 methodology for JBI scoping reviews. The University of Adelaide; 2015.

Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–85.

pubmed: 26052958 pmcid: 4491356 doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;20(5):69.

doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

pubmed: 30178033 doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

Choi M, Kong S, Jung D. Computer and internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: a Meta-analysis. Healthc Inform Res. 2012;18(3):191.

pubmed: 23115742 pmcid: 3483477 doi: 10.4258/hir.2012.18.3.191

Fan Q. Utilizing ICT to prevent loneliness and social isolation of the elderly. A literature review Cuad Trab Soc. 2016;29(2):185–200.

doi: 10.5209/CUTS.51771

Gasteiger N, Loveys K, Law M, Broadbent E. Friends from the future: a scoping review of research into robots and Computer agents to combat loneliness in older people. CIA. 2021;16:941–71.

doi: 10.2147/CIA.S282709

Hagan R, Manktelow R, Taylor BJ, Mallett J. Reducing loneliness amongst older people: a systematic search and narrative review. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(6):683–93.

pubmed: 24437736 doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.875122

Döring N, Conde M, Brandenburg K, Broll W, Gross HM, Werner S, et al. Can communication technologies reduce loneliness and social isolation in older people? A scoping review of reviews. IJERPH. 2022;19(18):11310.

pubmed: 36141581 pmcid: 9517063 doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811310

Balki E, Hayes N, Holland C. Effectiveness of technology interventions in addressing social isolation, connectedness, and loneliness in older adults: systematic umbrella review. JMIR Aging. 2022;5(4):e40125.

pubmed: 36279155 pmcid: 9641519 doi: 10.2196/40125

Wister A, O’Dea E, Fyffe I, D. Cosco T. Technological interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation among community-living older adults: a scoping review. Gerontechnol. 2021;20(2):1–16.

doi: 10.4017/gt.2021.20.2.30-471.11

Fu Z, Yan M, Meng C. The effectiveness of remote delivered intervention for loneliness reduction in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2022;28(13):935544.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935544

Petersen B, Khalili-Mahani N, Murphy C, Sawchuk K, Phillips N, Li KZH, et al. The association between information and communication technologies, loneliness and social connectedness: a scoping review. Front Psychol. 2023;22(14):1063146.

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1063146

Campos W, Martinez A, Sanchez W, Estrada H, Castro-Sánchez NA, Mujica D. A systematic review of proposals for the social integration of elderly people using ambient intelligence and social networking sites. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(3):529–42.

doi: 10.1007/s12559-016-9382-z

Baker S, Warburton J, Waycott J, Batchelor F, Hoang T, Dow B, et al. Combatting social isolation and increasing social participation of older adults through the use of technology: a systematic review of existing evidence. Austral J Ageing. 2018;37(3):184–93.

doi: 10.1111/ajag.12572

Chen YRR, Schulz PJ. The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e18.

pubmed: 26822073 pmcid: 4751336 doi: 10.2196/jmir.4596

Choi HK, Lee SH. Trends and effectiveness of ICT interventions for the elderly to reduce loneliness: a systematic review. Healthcare. 2021;9(3):293.

pubmed: 33800099 pmcid: 8002106 doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030293

Fuss B, Dorstyn D, Ward L. Computer-mediated communication and social support among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of cross-sectional data. Austral J Ageing. 2019;38(4):E103–13.

doi: 10.1111/ajag.12703

Heins P, Boots LMM, Koh WQ, Neven A, Verhey FRJ, de Vugt ME. The effects of technological interventions on social participation of community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112308 .

Ibarra F, Baez M, Cernuzzi L, Casati F. A systematic review on technology-supported interventions to improve old-age social wellbeing: loneliness, social isolation, and connectedness. J Healthcare Eng. 2020;2020:2036842. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2036842 .

Jin W, Liu Y, Yuan S, Bai R, Li X, Bai Z. The effectiveness of technology-based interventions for reducing loneliness in older adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Psychol. 2021;12:711030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711030 .

Khosravi P, Rezvani A, Wiewiora A. The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:594–603.

doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.092

Latikka R, Rubio-Hernández R, Lohan ES, Rantala J, Nieto Fernández F, Laitinen A, et al. Older adults’ loneliness, social isolation, and physical information and communication Technology in the era of ambient assisted living: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e28022.

pubmed: 34967760 pmcid: 8759023 doi: 10.2196/28022

Morris ME, Adair B, Ozanne E, Kurowski W, Miller KJ, Pearce AJ, et al. Smart technologies to enhance social connectedness in older people who live at home. Australas J Ageing. 2014;33(3):142–52.

pubmed: 24730370 doi: 10.1111/ajag.12154

Nef T, Ganea RL, Müri RM, Mosimann UP. Social networking sites and older users - a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(7):1041–53.

pubmed: 23552297 doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000355

Newman L, Stoner C, Spector A. Social networking sites and the experience of older adult users: a systematic review. Age Soc. 2021;41(2):377–402.

doi: 10.1017/S0144686X19001144

Nnabuko U, Anderson S. The effect of ICT on social support in healthcare: a systematic review. Iadis-Int J Comput Sci Inform Syst. 2018;13(1):14–32.

Sen K, Prybutok G, Prybutok V. The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: a systematic review. SSM Populat Health. 2021;17:101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101020 .

Shah SGS, Nogueras D, van Woerden HC, Kiparoglou V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness in older adults: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e24712.

pubmed: 34085942 pmcid: 8214187 doi: 10.2196/24712

Wiwatkunupakarn N, Pateekhum C, Aramrat C, Jirapornchaoren W, Pinyopornpanish K, Angkurawaranon C. Social networking site usage: a systematic review of its relationship with social isolation, loneliness, and depression among older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2022;26(7):1318–26.

pubmed: 34427132 doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1966745

Li J, Erdt M, Chen L, Cao Y, Lee SQ, Theng YL. The social effects of exergames on older adults: systematic review and metric analysis. J Med Int Res. 2018;20(6) Available from: http://www.epistemonikos.org/documents/66fabc39fdde10377bf3696fa49a2cf26da3c667

Zhou M, Cheng Z, Sabran K, Zahari Z. User interfaces for older adults to support social interaction through digital technology: a systematic review update. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2294988 .

Shekelle PG, Miake-Lye IM, Begashaw MM, Booth MS, Myers B, Lowery N, et al. Interventions to reduce loneliness in community-living older adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Gen Int Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08517-5 .

Chen E, Wood D, Ysseldyk R. Online social networking and mental health among older adults: a scoping review. Canad J Aging. 2022;41(1):26–39.

doi: 10.1017/S0714980821000040

Damant J, Knapp M, Freddolino P, Lombard D. Effects of digital engagement on the quality of life of older people. Health Soc Care Commun. 2017;25(6):1679–703.

doi: 10.1111/hsc.12335

Rodrigues NG, Han CQY, Su Y, Klainin-Yobas P, Wu XV. Psychological impacts and online interventions of social isolation amongst older adults during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(3):609–44.

pubmed: 34625997 doi: 10.1111/jan.15063

Thangavel G, Memedi M, Hedström K. Customized information and communication Technology for Reducing Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older Adults: scoping review. JMIR Mental Health. 2022;9(3):e34221. https://doi.org/10.2196/34221 .

Chipps J, Jarvis MA, Ramlall S. The effectiveness of e-interventions on reducing social isolation in older persons: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(10):817–27.

pubmed: 28958209 doi: 10.1177/1357633X17733773

Gorenko JA, Moran C, Flynn M, Dobson K, Konnert C. Social isolation and psychological distress among older adults related to COVID-19: a narrative review of remotely-delivered interventions and recommendations. J Appl Gerontol. 2021;40(1):3–13.

pubmed: 32914668 doi: 10.1177/0733464820958550

Kusumota L, Diniz MAA, Ribeiro RM, Silva ILC da, Figueira ALG, Rodrigues FR, et al. Impact of digital social media on the perception of loneliness and social isolation in older adults. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022;30:e3573.

Casanova G, Zaccaria D, Rolandi E, Guaita A. The effect of information and communication technology and social networking site use on older People’s well-being in relation to loneliness: review of experimental studies. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e23588.

pubmed: 33439127 pmcid: 7961406 doi: 10.2196/23588

Lei X, Matovic D, Leung WY, Viju A, Wuthrich VM. The relationship between social media use and psychosocial outcomes in older adults: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2024:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610223004519 .

OECD. DAC List of ODA Recipients. 2022. [cited 2023 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/DAC-List-of-ODA-Recipients-for-reporting-2022-23-flows.pdf .

Todd E, Bidstrup B, Mutch A. Using information and communication technology learnings to alleviate social isolation for older people during periods of mandated isolation: a review. Australas J Ageing. 2022;41(3):e227–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13041 .

Li J, Erdt M, Chen L, Cao Y, Lee SQ, Theng YL. The social effects of exergames on older adults: systematic review and metric analysis. J Med Int Res. 2018;20(6):e10486. https://doi.org/10.2196/10486 .

Morris JH. Body, person and environment: why promoting physical activity (PA) with stroke survivors requires holistic thinking. Brain Impairment. 2016;17(1):3–15.

doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2016.4

Noone C, McSharry J, Smalle M, Burns A, Dwan K, Devane D, et al. Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review. Cochrane datab system rev. 2020;5(5):CD013632.

Von Soest T, Luhmann M, Hansen T, Gerstorf D. Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: its nature and correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020;118(2):388–406.

doi: 10.1037/pspp0000219

Rapp T, Ronchetti J, Sicsic J. Where are populations aging better? A global comparison of healthy aging across Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. Value Health. 2022;25(9):1520–7.

pubmed: 35710893 doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.007

Marques S, Swift HJ, Vauclair CM, Lima ML, Bratt C, Abrams D. ‘Being old and ill’ across different countries: social status, age identification and older people’s subjective health. Psychol Health. 2015;30(6):699–714.

pubmed: 25000364 doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.938742

Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Hanratty B. Loneliness, social isolation and social relationships: what are we measuring? A novel framework for classifying and comparing tools. BMJ Open. 2016 Apr;6(4):e010799.

pubmed: 27091822 pmcid: 4838704 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010799

Gierveld J de J, Tilburg TG van, Dykstra PA. New Ways of Theorizing and Conducting Research in the Field of Loneliness and Social Isolation. In: Vangelisti AL, Perlman D, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 31]. p. 391–404. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781316417867%23CN-bp-29/type/book_part

Pagan R. Gender and age differences in loneliness: evidence for people without and with disabilities. IJERPH. 2020;17(24):9176.

pubmed: 33302577 pmcid: 7763056 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249176

Wang Y, Jiang W, Wu L. Association between age and loneliness in different residential type and gender groups: evidence from China. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):43.

pubmed: 36650472 pmcid: 9843997 doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04525-1

Borys S, Perlman D. Gender Differences in Loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1985;11(1):63–74.

doi: 10.1177/0146167285111006

Mannheim I, Schwartz E, Xi W, Buttigieg SC, McDonnell-Naughton M, Wouters EJM, et al. Inclusion of older adults in the research and Design of Digital Technology. IJERPH. 2019;16(19):3718.

pubmed: 31581632 pmcid: 6801827 doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193718

International Telecommunication Union. Ageing in a digital world - from vulnerable to valuable [internet]. Geneva; 2021. Report No.: 978-92-61-33601-1 (Electronic version). Available from: https://www.itu.int/hub/publication/d-phcb-dig_age-2021/