Characterization of a flexible a-Si:H detector for in vivo dosimetry in therapeutic x-ray beams.

flexible dosimetry hydrogenated amorphous silicon radiation detection

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Mar 2024
Historique:
revised: 24 01 2024
received: 26 10 2023
accepted: 18 02 2024
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 3 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The increasing use of complex and high dose-rate treatments in radiation therapy necessitates advanced detectors to provide accurate dosimetry. Rather than relying on pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) measurements alone, many countries are now mandating the use of in vivo dosimetry, whereby a dosimeter is placed on the surface of the patient during treatment. Ideally, in vivo detectors should be flexible to conform to a patient's irregular surfaces. This study aims to characterize a novel hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) radiation detector for the dosimetry of therapeutic x-ray beams. The detectors are flexible as they are fabricated directly on a flexible polyimide (Kapton) substrate. The potential of this technology for application as a real-time flexible detector is investigated through a combined dosimetric and flexibility study. Measurements of fundamental dosimetric quantities were obtained including output factor (OF), dose rate dependence (DPP), energy dependence, percentage depth dose (PDD), and angular dependence. The response of the a-Si:H detectors investigated in this study are benchmarked directly against commercially available ionization chambers and solid-state diodes currently employed for QA practices. The a-Si:H detectors exhibit remarkable dose linearities in the direct detection of kV and MV therapeutic x-rays, with calibrated sensitivities ranging from (0.580 ± 0.002) pC/cGy to (19.36 ± 0.10) pC/cGy as a function of detector thickness, area, and applied bias. Regarding dosimetry, the a-Si:H detectors accurately obtained OF measurements that parallel commercially available detector solutions. The PDD response closely matched the expected profile as predicted via Geant4 simulations, a PTW Farmer ionization chamber and a PTW ROOS chamber. The most significant variation in the PDD performance was 5.67%, observed at a depth of 3 mm for detectors operated unbiased. With an external bias, the discrepancy in PDD response from reference data was confined to ± 2.92% for all depths (surface to 250 mm) in water-equivalent plastic. Very little angular dependence is displayed between irradiations at angles of 0° and 180°, with the most significant variation being a 7.71% decrease in collected charge at a 110° relative angle of incidence. Energy dependence and dose per pulse dependence are also reported, with results in agreement with the literature. Most notably, the flexibility of a-Si:H detectors was quantified for sample bending up to a radius of curvature of 7.98 mm, where the recorded photosensitivity degraded by (-4.9 ± 0.6)% of the initial device response when flat. It is essential to mention that this small bending radius is unlikely during in vivo patient dosimetry. In a more realistic scenario, with a bending radius of 15-20 mm, the variation in detector response remained within ± 4%. After substantial bending, the detector's photosensitivity when returned to a flat condition was (99.1 ± 0.5)% of the original response. This work successfully characterizes a flexible detector based on thin-film a-Si:H deposited on a Kapton substrate for applications in therapeutic x-ray dosimetry. The detectors exhibit dosimetric performances that parallel commercially available dosimeters, while also demonstrating excellent flexibility results.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The increasing use of complex and high dose-rate treatments in radiation therapy necessitates advanced detectors to provide accurate dosimetry. Rather than relying on pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) measurements alone, many countries are now mandating the use of in vivo dosimetry, whereby a dosimeter is placed on the surface of the patient during treatment. Ideally, in vivo detectors should be flexible to conform to a patient's irregular surfaces.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to characterize a novel hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) radiation detector for the dosimetry of therapeutic x-ray beams. The detectors are flexible as they are fabricated directly on a flexible polyimide (Kapton) substrate.
METHODS METHODS
The potential of this technology for application as a real-time flexible detector is investigated through a combined dosimetric and flexibility study. Measurements of fundamental dosimetric quantities were obtained including output factor (OF), dose rate dependence (DPP), energy dependence, percentage depth dose (PDD), and angular dependence. The response of the a-Si:H detectors investigated in this study are benchmarked directly against commercially available ionization chambers and solid-state diodes currently employed for QA practices.
RESULTS RESULTS
The a-Si:H detectors exhibit remarkable dose linearities in the direct detection of kV and MV therapeutic x-rays, with calibrated sensitivities ranging from (0.580 ± 0.002) pC/cGy to (19.36 ± 0.10) pC/cGy as a function of detector thickness, area, and applied bias. Regarding dosimetry, the a-Si:H detectors accurately obtained OF measurements that parallel commercially available detector solutions. The PDD response closely matched the expected profile as predicted via Geant4 simulations, a PTW Farmer ionization chamber and a PTW ROOS chamber. The most significant variation in the PDD performance was 5.67%, observed at a depth of 3 mm for detectors operated unbiased. With an external bias, the discrepancy in PDD response from reference data was confined to ± 2.92% for all depths (surface to 250 mm) in water-equivalent plastic. Very little angular dependence is displayed between irradiations at angles of 0° and 180°, with the most significant variation being a 7.71% decrease in collected charge at a 110° relative angle of incidence. Energy dependence and dose per pulse dependence are also reported, with results in agreement with the literature. Most notably, the flexibility of a-Si:H detectors was quantified for sample bending up to a radius of curvature of 7.98 mm, where the recorded photosensitivity degraded by (-4.9 ± 0.6)% of the initial device response when flat. It is essential to mention that this small bending radius is unlikely during in vivo patient dosimetry. In a more realistic scenario, with a bending radius of 15-20 mm, the variation in detector response remained within ± 4%. After substantial bending, the detector's photosensitivity when returned to a flat condition was (99.1 ± 0.5)% of the original response.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This work successfully characterizes a flexible detector based on thin-film a-Si:H deposited on a Kapton substrate for applications in therapeutic x-ray dosimetry. The detectors exhibit dosimetric performances that parallel commercially available dosimeters, while also demonstrating excellent flexibility results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38432192
doi: 10.1002/mp.17013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: recommendations of AAPM task group no. 218. Med Phys. 2018;45(4):e53-e83. doi:10.1002/mp.12810
Prabhakar R. Real-time dosimetry in external beam radiation therapy. World J Radiol. 2013;5(10):352-355. doi:10.4329/wjr.v5.i10.352
Teunen D. The european directive on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposures (97/43/euratom). J Radiol Prot. 1998;18(2):133-137. doi:10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/009
Knöös, T. Lessons Learnt from Past Incidents and Accidents in Radiation Oncology. Clin. Oncol. 2017;29(9):557-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2017.06.008
Santos T, Ventura T. A review on radiochromic film dosimetry for dose verification in high energy photon beams. Radiat Phys Chem. 2021;179:109217. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109217
Brace OJ, Fuduli I, Alnaghy S, et al. A large area pixelated silicon array detector for independent transit in vivo dosimetry. Appl Sci. 2022;12(2):537. doi:10.3390/app12020537
Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Beddar S, Greer P, et al. In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020;15:108-116.doi:10.1016/j.phro.2020.08.003
Archer J, Li E, Petasecca M, et al. Synchrotron x-ray microbeam dosimetry with a 20 micrometre resolution scintillator fibre-optic dosimeter. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2018;25(3):826-832. doi:10.1107/s1600577518003016
Posar JA, Davis J, Large MJ, et al. Characterization of an organic semiconductor diode for dosimetry in radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2020;47(8):3658-3668. doi:10.1002/mp.14229
Large MJ, Posar JA, Mozer AJ, et al. Flexible polymer x-ray detectors with non-fullerene acceptors for enhanced stability: toward printable tissue equivalent devices for medical applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(48):57703-57712. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c16914
Hachadorian RL, Bruza P, Jermyn M, et al. Imaging radiation dose in breast radiotherapy by x-ray CT calibration of Cherenkov light. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2298. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16031-z
Zhu TC, Ong Y, Sun H, et al. Cherenkov imaging for Total Skin Electron Therapy-an evaluation of dose uniformity. In Proceedings SPIE 11628, Mechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy and Photobiomodulation, 116280R. 2021. doi:10.1117/12.2583939
Petasecca M, Alhujaili S, Aldosari AH, et al. Angular independent silicon detector for dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2015;42(8):4708-4718. doi:10.1118/1.4926778
Jeong S, Cheon W, Shin D, et al. Development of a dosimetry system for therapeutic x-rays using a flexible amorphous silicon thin-film solar cell with a scintillator screen. Med Phys. 2022;49(7):4768-4779. doi:10.1002/mp.15664
Street RA. Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Large MJ, Bizzarri M, Calcagnile L, et al. Hydrogenated amorphous silicon high flux x-ray detectors for synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(13):135010. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/acdb43
Talamonti C, Large M, Pallotta S, et al. PD-0898 first dosimetric characterization of an a-Si:H dosimeter on flexible support. Radiother Oncol. 2023;182(1):S744-S745. doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(23)09023-0
Menichelli M, Bizzarri M, Boscardin M, et al. Testing of planar hydrogenated amorphous silicon sensors with charge selective contacts for the construction of 3D-detectors. J Instrum. 2022;17(03):C03033. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/17/03/c03033
Fuduli I, Porumb C, Espinoza AA, et al. A comparative analysis of multichannel data acquisition systems for quality assurance in external beam radiation therapy. J Instrum. 2014;9(06):T06003. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/06/t06003
Menichelli M, Bizzarri M, Boscardin M, et al. Fabrication of a hydrogenated amorphous silicon detector in 3-D geometry and preliminary test on planar prototypes. Instruments. 2021;5(4):32. doi:10.3390/instruments5040032
Li HU, Jackson TN. Flexibility testing strategies and apparatus for flexible electronics. IEEE Trans Electron Devices. 2016;63(5):1934-1939. doi:10.1109/ted.2016.2545706
Saleh R, Barth M, Eberhardt W, Zimmermann A. Bending setups for reliability investigation of flexible electronics. micromachines. 2021;12(1):78. doi:10.3390/mi12010078
Ernst D, Zerna T, Wolter KJ, Influences of organic materials on packaging technologies and their consideration for lifetime evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2011 34th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE). IEEE. 2011. 288-293. doi:10.1109/ISSE.2011.6053875
Happonen T, Häkkinen J, Fabritius T. Cyclic bending reliability of silk screen printed silver traces on plastic and paper substrates. IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab. 2015;15(3):394-401. doi:10.1109/TDMR.2015.2457231
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to imagej: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671-675. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089
Vicoroski N, Espinoza A, Duncan M, et al. Development of a silicon diode detector for skin dosimetry in radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2017;44(10):5402-5412. doi:10.1002/mp.12469
Oborn BM, Williams M, Bailey M, Carolan MG. IMRT treatment monitor unit verification using absolute calibrated BEAMnrc and Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations. J Phys Conf Ser. 2014;489:012020. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/489/1/012020
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The use of plane-parallel ionization chambers in high-energy electron and photon beams: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry. Technical Report Series no. 381, 1997.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. Technical Report Series no. 398, IAEA, Vienna. 2000.
Wilkins D, Li XA, Cygler J, Gerig L. The effect of dose rate dependence of p-type silicon detectors on linac relative dosimetry. Med Phys. 1997;24(6):879-881. doi:10.1118/1.597985
Wong JH, Fuduli I, Carolan M, et al. Characterization of a novel two dimensional diode array the “Magic plate” as a radiation detector for radiation therapy treatment. Med Phys. 2012;39(5):2544-2558. doi:10.1118/1.3700234
Sauer OA, Wilbert J. Measurement of output factors for small photon beams. Med Phys. 2007;34(6 Part 1):1983-1988. doi:10.1118/1.2734383
Khan FM. The Physics of Radiation Therapy. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM, X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients: NIST Standard Reference Database 126. National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA [Database]. 2004. doi:https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients
Alnawaf H, Butson M, Yu PKN. Measurement and effects of MOSKIN detectors on skin dose during high energy radiotherapy treatment. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2012;35:321-328. doi:10.1007/s13246-012-0153-1
Wu X, Shu C, He X, et al. Optically transparent and thermal-stable polyimide films derived from a semi-aliphatic diamine: synthesis and properties. Macromol Chem Phys. 2020;221(5):1900506. doi:10.1002/macp.201900506

Auteurs

Matthew James Large (MJ)

Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Aishah Bashiri (A)

Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Physics, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.

Yashiv Dookie (Y)

Shoalhaven Cancer Care Centre, Nowra, New South Wales, Australia.

Joanne McNamara (J)

Shoalhaven Cancer Care Centre, Nowra, New South Wales, Australia.

Luca Antognini (L)

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Saba Aziz (S)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Lucio Calcagnile (L)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Anna Paola Caricato (AP)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Roberto Catalano (R)

INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy.

Deborah Chila (D)

INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Department of Experimental and Biomedical Clinical Science "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Giuseppe Antonio Pablo Cirrone (GAP)

INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy.

Tomasso Croci (T)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Giacomo Cuttone (G)

INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy.

Sylvain Dunand (S)

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Michele Fabi (M)

INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.

Luca Frontini (L)

INFN Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, Milan, Italy.

Catia Grimani (C)

INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.

Maria Ionica (M)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Keida Kanxheri (K)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Dip. di Fisica e Geologia dell'Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Valentino Liberali (V)

INFN Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, Milan, Italy.

Martino Maurizio (M)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Giuseppe Maruccio (G)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Giovanni Mazza (G)

INFN Sezione di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Mauro Menichelli (M)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Anna Grazia Monteduro (AG)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Arianna Morozzi (A)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Francesco Moscatelli (F)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
CNR-IOM, Perugia, Italy.

Stefania Pallotta (S)

INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Department of Experimental and Biomedical Clinical Science "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Daniele Passeri (D)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Università degli studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Maddalena Pedio (M)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
CNR-IOM, Perugia, Italy.

Giada Petringa (G)

INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy.

Francesca Peverini (F)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Dip. di Fisica e Geologia dell'Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Lorenzo Piccolo (L)

INFN Sezione di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Pisana Placidi (P)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Università degli studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Gianluca Quarta (G)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Silvia Rizzato (S)

INFN Sezione di Lecce, via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Mathematics and Physics "Ennio de Giorgi", University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, Lecce, Italy.

Federico Sabbatini (F)

INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.

Leonello Servoli (L)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Alberto Stabile (A)

INFN Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, Milan, Italy.

Cinzia Talamonti (C)

INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Department of Experimental and Biomedical Clinical Science "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Jonathan Emanuel Thomet (JE)

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Luca Tosti (L)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Mattia Villani (M)

INFN Sezione di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
DiSPeA, Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.

Richard James Wheadon (RJ)

INFN Sezione di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Nicolas Wyrsch (N)

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Photovoltaics and Thin-Film Electronics Laboratory (PV-Lab), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Nicola Zema (N)

INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
CNR Istituto struttura della Materia, Rome, Italy.

Marco Petasecca (M)

Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Classifications MeSH