Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in inflammatory bowel disease inpatients - Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
Acta haematologica
ISSN: 1421-9662
Titre abrégé: Acta Haematol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0141053
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
12
09
2023
accepted:
22
02
2024
medline:
4
3
2024
pubmed:
4
3
2024
entrez:
3
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are three-times more likely to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE), and guidelines recommend prophylaxis during all hospitalizations. In this systematic review we sought to assess for the benefits and risks of VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized IBD patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE and others up to 2/2022, for studies on IBD inpatients treated with prophylactic anti-coagulation during hospitalization, compared to no prophylaxis. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were any VTE and major bleeding, respectively. Results were pooled using random-effects models, calculating odds-ratios (OR) and 95% confidence-intervals (CI). The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess bias. We extracted data from 18 observational studies, and two randomized-trial subgroups. The studies were highly variable regarding the included populations, interventions, and outcome definitions. Meta-analysis of all studies showed a non-significant effect of prophylaxis on VTEs (OR 0.97[95%CI 0.49-1.95]). An analysis of eight lower-risk-of-bias studies showed a significant reduction in VTEs (OR 0.27[95%CI 0.13-0.55), number needed to treat(NNT) 34.8[95%CI 26.8-49.8]. A significant protective effect persisted in several subgroups. Major-bleeding was reported in three studies and showed a significant increase with prophylaxis (OR 2.02[95%CI 1.11-3.67], number needed to harm(NNH) 113.6[95%CI 40.7-very-large-number]). In studies with lower-risk-of-bias, a significant reduction in VTEs was shown in patients treated with VTE prophylaxis (NNT=35), which should be carefully considered against an increased major-bleeding risk (NNH=114). However current data is limited and randomized trials dedicated to IBD inpatients would aid in understating whether universal prophylaxis should be recommended.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38432204
pii: 000538086
doi: 10.1159/000538086
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.