External validation of COMPASS and BIOSCOPE prognostic scores in colorectal peritoneal metastases treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

BIOSCOPE COMPASS Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) Peritoneal metastases (PM) Risk stratification

Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 22 04 2022
revised: 11 10 2022
accepted: 14 10 2022
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 3 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The selection of patients undergoing cytoreductive- surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is crucial. BIOSCOPE and COMPASS are prognostic scores designed to stratify survival into four classes according to clinical and pathological features. The purpose of this study is to analyze the prognostic role of these scores using a large cohort of patients as an external reference. Overall survival analysis was performed using Log-Rank and Kaplan-Meier curves for each score. The probability of survival at 12, 36, and 60 months was tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine sensitivity and specificity. From the validation cohort of 437 patients, the analysis included 410 patients in the COMPASS group and 364 patients in the BIOSCOPE group (100% data completeness). We observed a different patient distribution between classes (high-risk for BIOSCOPE compared to COMPASS, p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, both COMPASS and BIOSCOPE effectively stratified overall survival (Log-Rank, p = 0.0001 in both cases), with a lack of discrimination between COMPASS classes II and III (p = n.s.). COMPASS at 12 m and BIOSCOPE at 60 m showed the best performance in terms of survival prediction (AUC of 0.82 and 0.81). The specificity of the two tests is good (median 81.3%), whereas sensibility is quite low (median 64.2%). Following external validation in a large population of patients with CRC-PM who are eligible for surgery, the COMPASS and BIOSCOPE scores exhibit high inter-test variability but effectively stratify cancer-related mortality risk. While the quality of the scores is similar, BIOSCOPE shows better inter-tier differentiation, suggesting that tumor molecular classification could improve test discrimination capability. More powerful stratification scores with the inclusion of novel predictors are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38432873
pii: S0748-7983(22)00699-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

604-610

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Marco Tonello (M)

Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Dario Baratti (D)

Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Dept. of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Paolo Sammartino (P)

Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Andrea Di Giorgio (A)

Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Manuela Robella (M)

Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.

Cinzia Sassaroli (C)

Integrated Medical Surgical Research of Peritoneal Neoplasm - Abdominal Oncology Department, "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy.

Massimo Framarini (M)

General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.

Mario Valle (M)

Peritoneal Malignancies Unit, INT "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.

Antonio Macrì (A)

Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Luigina Graziosi (L)

University of Perugia, General and Emergency Surgery Department, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.

Paola Fugazzola (P)

General Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.

Piero Vincenzo Lippolis (PV)

General and Peritoneal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital University Pisa (AOUP), Pisa, Italy.

Roberta Gelmini (R)

General and Oncological Surgery Unit, AOU of Modena University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Daniele Biacchi (D)

Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Shigeki Kasamura (S)

Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Dept. of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Marcello Deraco (M)

Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Dept. of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Carola Cenzi (C)

Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Paola Del Bianco (P)

Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Marco Vaira (M)

Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.

Antonio Sommariva (A)

Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy. Electronic address: antonio.sommariva@iov.veneto.it.

Classifications MeSH