Adherence to national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid in pregnancy in England.

Diet PEAR Study midwife nutrition guidance pregnancy public health

Journal

Public health nutrition
ISSN: 1475-2727
Titre abrégé: Public Health Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9808463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 4 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The NHS England website provides guidance on foods/drinks to avoid or limit in pregnancy because of microbiological, toxicological or teratogenic hazards. The aims were to determine adherence and whether demographic characteristics were associated with adherence. Cross-sectional study. Online survey of postpartum women resident in England during pregnancy. Recently postpartum women resident in England during their pregnancy (n=598; median age 33 (IQR 30-36) years) completed an online questionnaire (April to November 2022). Questions included those on consumption of 21 food/drink items that the NHS advises pregnant women to avoid/limit. The study is part of the Pregnancy, the Environment And nutRition (PEAR) Study. Summary statistics were used to determine proportions adhering to the guidance. Adjusted logistic regression was used to model the associations of adherence with demographic characteristics. Adherence was generally high (>90% for eight of ten food/drink items to be avoided). However, among pre-pregnancy consumers, several items were not completely avoided: e.g. 81% (128/158) for game meat/gamebirds, 37% (176/478) for cured meats pre-pregnancy, and 17% (81/467) for soft cheeses. Greater educational attainment (e.g. caffeinated soft drinks OR 2.25 (95% CI 1.28, 3.94)), greater maternal age (e.g. oily fish 1.64 (1.05, 2.56)) and lower parity were the most usual characteristics associated with adherence. Evidence of concerning levels of non-adherence for some food/drink items suggest a case for more education on some of the guidance, particularly for women with lower educational attainment, greater parity and greater maternal age. Further research on barriers to the implementation of the guidance is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38433598
pii: S1368980024000600
doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000600
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-23

Auteurs

Lucy Beasant (L)

Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.

Jenny Ingram (J)

Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.

Pauline M Emmett (PM)

Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.

Janet E Cade (JE)

Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Caroline M Taylor (CM)

Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.

Classifications MeSH