Smallholder farmers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding agricultural inputs with a focus on agricultural biologicals.

Agricultural inputs Biofertilizers Biologicals Biopesticides Biostimulants Knowledge attitudes and practices (KAP) Smallholder farmers Sub-Saharan Africa

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 08 06 2023
revised: 25 01 2024
accepted: 19 02 2024
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 4 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is a general drive to reduce pesticide use owing to the potential negative effects of pesticides on the environment and human health. The EU Commission, for example, through its "Farm to Fork Strategy," has proposed to decrease the use of hazardous chemical pesticides by 50% by 2030. In addition, smallholder farmers in low-income countries do not always follow pesticide safety precautions. This necessitates the introduction of low-risk crop protection strategies also suited for these farmers. Agricultural biologicals can substitute for, or at least partially replace hazardous chemical pesticides. While the market for and use of biologicals is growing quickly in industrialized countries, this practice remains limited in sub-Saharan Africa. To understand the reason behind the low adoption of biologicals, this study examined the knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward biologicals among 150 smallholder farmers in the Chole district in Ethiopia. All farmers used chemical pesticides and/or inorganic fertilizers to protect crops, improve yields, and comply with government regulations. The use of biologicals was, however, restricted to one group of biologicals, bio-fertilizers, which approximately 60% of farmers used, and no use of biologicals for plant protection was reported. Even though the understanding of the concept of biologicals was deemed high among respondents, the majority (90%) did not identify biologicals as safer alternatives to conventional agricultural inputs. More than half of the respondents (54%) did not recommend biologicals as safer alternatives to their colleagues. Nevertheless, even if the responding farmers did not perceive biologicals as risk-free, they had a positive attitude towards biologicals when it came to producing healthy food and increasing crop yields and incomes. In comparison to the positive attitude, farmers' knowledge and practice of biologicals were generally low; thus, efforts are needed to create awareness among farmers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38434028
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26719
pii: S2405-8440(24)02750-6
pmc: PMC10906418
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e26719

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Tewodros Mulugeta (T)

Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Science, Kotebe University of Education, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Mesia Ilomo (M)

Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Allan Mueke (A)

Department of Animal Health and Production, School of Pure and Applied Science, Mount Kenya University, General Kago Rd PO BOX 342-01000, Thika, Kenya.

Cecillia Onyango (C)

Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

Lerato Matsaunyane (L)

Department of Plant Breeding, Agricultural Research Council-Vegetable and Ornamental Plants, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.

Quenton Kritzinger (Q)

Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Erik Alexandersson (E)

Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), SE-23053, Lomma, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH