Test-retest, intra- and inter-rater reliability of the reactive balance test in patients with chronic ankle instability.

ankle injury functional performance test neurocognitive performance test reproducibility screening

Journal

Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 12 10 2023
accepted: 23 01 2024
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 4 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Reactive Balance Test (RBT) could be a valuable addition to research on chronic ankle instability (CAI) and clinical practice, but before it can be used in clinical practice it needs to be reliable. It has already been proven reliable in healthy recreational athletes, but not yet in patients with CAI who have shown persistent deficits in dynamic balance. The study aimed to determine the test-retest, intra-, and inter-rater reliability of the RBT in patients with CAI, and the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the newly developed RBT score sheet. We used a repeated-measures, single-group design to administer the RBT to CAI patients on three occasions, scored by multiple raters. We included 27 participants with CAI. The study used multiple reliability measures, including Pearson r, intra-class correlations (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), standard error of prediction (SEP), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman plots, to evaluate the reliability of the RBT's outcome measures (visuomotor response time and accuracy). It also assessed the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the RBT score sheet using the same measures. The ICC measures for test-retest reliability were similar for accuracy (0.609) and VMRT (0.594). Intra-rater reliability had high correlations and ICCs for accuracy ( Test-retest reliability was moderate, intra-rater reliability was good, and inter-rater reliability showed moderate reliability for accuracy and good reliability for VMRT. Additionally, the RBT shows robust SEM and mean difference measures. The score sheet method also demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability, while inter-rater reliability was good to excellent. This suggests that the RBT can be a valuable tool in assessing and monitoring balance in patients with CAI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38434204
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1320043
pmc: PMC10906270
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1320043

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Maricot, Lathouwers, Verschueren, De Pauw, Meeusen, Roelands and Tassignon.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Alexandre Maricot (A)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Elke Lathouwers (E)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Jo Verschueren (J)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Kevin De Pauw (K)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Brussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Romain Meeusen (R)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Brussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Sports, Recreation, Exercise and Sciences (SRES), Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

Bart Roelands (B)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Brussels Human Robotics Research Center (BruBotics), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Bruno Tassignon (B)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH