Decisional Regret Surrounding Dialysis Initiation: A Comparative Analysis.

Hemodialysis patient-centered care peritoneal dialysis shared decision making

Journal

Kidney medicine
ISSN: 2590-0595
Titre abrégé: Kidney Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101756300

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 14 04 2023
revised: 20 10 2023
accepted: 19 11 2023
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 4 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Dialysis comes with a substantial treatment burden, so patients must select care plans that align with their preferences. We aimed to deepen the understanding of decisional regret with dialysis choices. This study had a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design. All patients from a single academic medical center prescribed maintenance in-center hemodialysis or presenting for home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis check-up during 3 weeks were approached for survey. A total of 78 patients agreed to participate. Patients with the highest (15 patients) and lowest decisional regret (20 patients) were invited to semistructured interviews. Decisional regret scale and illness intrusiveness scale were used in this study. Quantitatively, we examined correlations between the decision regret scale and illness intrusiveness scale and sorted patients into the highest and lowest decision regret scale quartiles for further interviews; then, we compared patient characteristics between those that consented to interview in high and low decisional regret. Qualitatively, we used an adapted grounded theory approach to examine differences between interviewed patients with high and low decisional regret. Of patients invited to participate in the interviews, 21 patients (8 high regret, 13 low regret) agreed. We observed that patients with high decisional regret displayed resignation toward dialysis, disruption of their sense of self and social roles, and self-blame, whereas patients with low decisional regret demonstrated positivity, integration of dialysis into their identity, and self-compassion. Patients with the highest levels of decisional regret may have already withdrawn from dialysis. Patients could complete interviews in any location (eg, home, dialysis unit, and clinical office), which may have influenced patient disclosure. Although all patients experienced disruption after dialysis initiation, patients' approach to adversity differs between patients experiencing high versus low regret. This study identifies emotional responses to dialysis that may be modifiable through patient-support interventions. As part of a quality improvement initiative in our dialysis practice, a patient stated, “I wish I never started dialysis.” This quote served as the catalyst for embarking on a research project with the aim to understand why patients living with end-stage kidney disease have regret about starting and continuing dialysis, a lifesaving but time-intensive measure. We surveyed and interviewed patients on the topic and learned that patients experiencing regret had a disrupted sense of self and blamed themselves for their need of dialysis. Patients with little to no regret demonstrated positivity and self-compassion. These findings will help health care professionals as they work with patients considering dialysis or having newly started dialysis.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
As part of a quality improvement initiative in our dialysis practice, a patient stated, “I wish I never started dialysis.” This quote served as the catalyst for embarking on a research project with the aim to understand why patients living with end-stage kidney disease have regret about starting and continuing dialysis, a lifesaving but time-intensive measure. We surveyed and interviewed patients on the topic and learned that patients experiencing regret had a disrupted sense of self and blamed themselves for their need of dialysis. Patients with little to no regret demonstrated positivity and self-compassion. These findings will help health care professionals as they work with patients considering dialysis or having newly started dialysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38435065
doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100785
pii: S2590-0595(23)00203-0
pmc: PMC10907211
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100785

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Auteurs

Aditya S Pawar (AS)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir (B)

Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Sam Whitman (S)

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.

Katherine Pine (K)

Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.

Alexander Lee (A)

Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Nataly R Espinoza Suarez (NR)

Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Québec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center (CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale), Québec, Canada.

Paige Organick Lee (P)

Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Anjali Thota (A)

Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Elizabeth Lorenz (E)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Annika Beck (A)

Bioethics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Robert Albright (R)

Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Molly Feely (M)

Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Amy Williams (A)

Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Emma Behnken (E)

Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Kasey R Boehmer (KR)

Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Classifications MeSH