Patient Outcomes in Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Documentaries and on Air Ambulance Websites.

emergency media prehospital public perception television

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
accepted: 01 02 2024
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 4 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background Helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) documentaries attract millions of viewers, and publicly available patient stories on Air Ambulance websites are vital to raise awareness and funding for Air Ambulance charities in the United Kingdom (UK). Despite abundant research investigating how fictional programs and news outlets present patient health outcomes, there are no comprehensive studies that investigate how non-fictional HEMS documentaries or Air Ambulance websites present patient outcomes. The aim of this study is to capture the frequency of poor outcomes (mortality) in patients broadcasted on documentaries focusing on HEMS and the patient stories section of UK Air Ambulance websites. Methods A retrospective cohort study reviewed five HEMS documentaries between January 2016 and October 2019 and 20 Air Ambulance websites that had patient stories published until October 2020. In all, 628 patients identified fit the eligibility criteria: 311 from HEMS documentaries and 317 patients from Air Ambulance websites.  Results In all, 0.64% (4/628) of patients died before the hospital, including 0.96% (3/311) of patients on HEMS documentaries and 0.32% (1/317) of patients on Air Ambulance websites. In addition, 2.23% (14/628) of patients died according to their final mention in the data source, including 1.93% (6/311) of patients on HEMS documentaries and 2.52% (8/317) of patients on Air Ambulance websites. Conclusions This study suggests under-reporting of poor patient outcomes in HEMS documentaries and on UK Air Ambulance websites. This could be attributed to the logistical and ethical implications of capturing and presenting poor outcomes but likely impacts upon public perception. Medical professionals should recognize this in order to proactively address potential misconceptions when communicating with patients and their families.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38435219
doi: 10.7759/cureus.53414
pmc: PMC10908567
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e53414

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, McMunn et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Michael D. Christian was employed as a HEMS doctor and the Research and Clinical Effectiveness Lead for the London's Air Ambulance (a charitable organization) at the time of research. There was no funding received from London's Air Ambulance for this study. Christian MD was not involved in any data collection.

Auteurs

Finlay W McMunn (FW)

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, GBR.
Medicine and Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR.

Rosalyn Buckland (R)

Medicine and Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Rosanna E Watts (RE)

Medicine and Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR.

Jake Roberts (J)

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, GBR.

Michael D Christian (MD)

Critical Care, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, CAN.

Classifications MeSH