Effect of opioid-free

dexmedetomidine enhanced recovery after surgery hypoxaemia nausea nociception pain remifentanil vomiting

Journal

BJA open
ISSN: 2772-6096
Titre abrégé: BJA Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918419157906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 14 12 2023
accepted: 30 01 2024
medline: 4 3 2024
pubmed: 4 3 2024
entrez: 4 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The efficacy and safety of opioid-free anaesthesia during bariatric surgery remain debated, particularly when administering multimodal analgesia. As multimodal analgesia has become the standard of care in many centres, we aimed to determine if such a strategy coupled with either dexmedetomidine (opioid-free anaesthesia) or remifentanil with a morphine transition (opioid-based anaesthesia), would reduce postoperative morphine requirements and opioid-related adverse events. In this prospective double-blind study, 172 class III obese patients having laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery were randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anaesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (opioid-free group) or sevoflurane-remifentanil anaesthesia with a morphine transition (opioid-based group). Both groups received at anaesthesia induction a bolus of magnesium, lidocaine, ketamine, paracetamol, diclofenac, and dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of recovery (QoR40), incidence of hypoxaemia, bradycardia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Eighty-six patients were recruited in each group (predominantly women, 70% had obstructive sleep apnoea). There was no significant difference in postoperative morphine consumption (median [inter-quartile range]: 16 [13-26] During bariatric surgery, a multimodal opioid-free anaesthesia technique did not decrease postoperative morphine consumption when compared with a multimodal opioid-based strategy. Quality of recovery did not differ between groups although the incidence of PONV was less in the opioid-free group. NCT05004519.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The efficacy and safety of opioid-free anaesthesia during bariatric surgery remain debated, particularly when administering multimodal analgesia. As multimodal analgesia has become the standard of care in many centres, we aimed to determine if such a strategy coupled with either dexmedetomidine (opioid-free anaesthesia) or remifentanil with a morphine transition (opioid-based anaesthesia), would reduce postoperative morphine requirements and opioid-related adverse events.
Methods UNASSIGNED
In this prospective double-blind study, 172 class III obese patients having laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery were randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anaesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (opioid-free group) or sevoflurane-remifentanil anaesthesia with a morphine transition (opioid-based group). Both groups received at anaesthesia induction a bolus of magnesium, lidocaine, ketamine, paracetamol, diclofenac, and dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of recovery (QoR40), incidence of hypoxaemia, bradycardia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
Results UNASSIGNED
Eighty-six patients were recruited in each group (predominantly women, 70% had obstructive sleep apnoea). There was no significant difference in postoperative morphine consumption (median [inter-quartile range]: 16 [13-26]
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
During bariatric surgery, a multimodal opioid-free anaesthesia technique did not decrease postoperative morphine consumption when compared with a multimodal opioid-based strategy. Quality of recovery did not differ between groups although the incidence of PONV was less in the opioid-free group.
Clinical trial registration UNASSIGNED
NCT05004519.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38435809
doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100263
pii: S2772-6096(24)00007-8
pmc: PMC10906147
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05004519']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100263

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Auteurs

Matthieu Clanet (M)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Chirec Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Karim Touihri (K)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Chirec Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Celine El Haddad (C)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Chirec Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Nicolas Goldsztejn (N)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Chirec Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Jacques Himpens (J)

Department of General Surgery, Chirec Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Jean Francois Fils (JF)

Ars Statistica Private Statistic Society, Nivelles, Belgium.

Yann Gricourt (Y)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France.

Philippe Van der Linden (P)

Consultant Anaesthesiologist, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Sean Coeckelenbergh (S)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Paris-Saclay University, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif, France.
Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Alexandre Joosten (A)

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, LA, CA, USA.

Anne-Catherine Dandrifosse (AC)

Department of General Surgery, Chirec Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH