Compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) to change health behaviours: a systematic review.

Dyadic interventions; dyadic intervention techniques; health behaviour change; partner involvement; couples

Journal

Health psychology review
ISSN: 1743-7202
Titre abrégé: Health Psychol Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101299723

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 5 3 2024
pubmed: 5 3 2024
entrez: 4 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Dyadic interventions for health behaviour change involving the romantic partner are promising. However, it often remains unclear how exactly the partner is involved in dyadic interventions. We propose a novel compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) that facilitates systematic description of dyadic interventions in terms of who performs what for whom during intervention delivery and subsequent implementation. We aimed to systematically characterise dyadic interventions along their degree of partner involvement and to provide a comprehensive list of DITs used in dyadic interventions with romantic partners. We systematically reviewed dyadic health behaviour change interventions with controlled designs. We included 165 studies describing 122 distinct dyadic interventions with romantic partners. Interventions were classified along their degree of partner involvement, 160 DITs were extracted, and their frequencies of use counted. The majority of interventions ( The present review contributes to the development of a shared and systematic way of describing dyadic interventions to facilitate cumulation of evidence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Dyadic interventions for health behaviour change involving the romantic partner are promising. However, it often remains unclear how exactly the partner is involved in dyadic interventions. We propose a novel compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) that facilitates systematic description of dyadic interventions in terms of who performs what for whom during intervention delivery and subsequent implementation.
OBJECTIVE UNASSIGNED
We aimed to systematically characterise dyadic interventions along their degree of partner involvement and to provide a comprehensive list of DITs used in dyadic interventions with romantic partners.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
We systematically reviewed dyadic health behaviour change interventions with controlled designs. We included 165 studies describing 122 distinct dyadic interventions with romantic partners. Interventions were classified along their degree of partner involvement, 160 DITs were extracted, and their frequencies of use counted.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
The majority of interventions (
DISCUSSION UNASSIGNED
The present review contributes to the development of a shared and systematic way of describing dyadic interventions to facilitate cumulation of evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38437798
doi: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2307534
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-36

Auteurs

Sally Di Maio (S)

Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Karoline Villinger (K)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Nina Knoll (N)

Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Urte Scholz (U)

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Gertraud Stadler (G)

Institute of Gender in Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Caterina Gawrilow (C)

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Tübingen, Germany.

Corina Berli (C)

Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH